Binance Square

agentpay

419 views
4 Discussing
web3空投姐
·
--
Bullish
When I came across that tweet from Trump Jr., I was flipping through the technical documentation for AgentPay. He said AI agents can think but won’t pay, just like a senior intern. I almost laughed out loud, but one sentence in the documentation stopped me. "Every transaction must first pass the rules you set for yourself before it can be signed; there’s no way around it." Earlier, money was like a pure obedient machine—Alipay, USDT, USDC—if you told it to move, it would move, never caring whether the money should be spent or if the address was reliable. Now AI is starting to run its own strategies; it thinks if it should spend money, it just spends it directly. When you look back at the bill, you’re left confused, and it says, "I judged it reasonable at the time; do you dare to trust me completely?" The most ruthless part of AgentPay is that it puts the rules in front of the signature. If AI wants to spend, is it over budget or is the address wrong? It doesn’t even get the qualification to sign; the money simply can’t move, and then it sends a push notification to your phone, waiting for your approval. The private key is still on your own device, and you set all the rules. Now stablecoins are clearly divided into two types: USDT and USDC are the porters, responsible for delivering money from A to B quickly and accurately. #USD1 combined with AgentPay is becoming a referee. Before moving money, a whistle is blown, and the whistle is completely in your hands. The default setting has changed from being able to move whenever to first passing the rules before moving; this is the real change in the game rules. Recently, two events have simultaneously exploded in the market. @binance announced that holding USD1 will allow you to share 135 million $WLFI tokens, and the AgentPay SDK has officially gone open source. One grabs liquidity, and the other captures the rules layer. USD1 is clearly vying for the default currency position in the AI economy. Developers, don’t just scroll through Twitter; hurry to GitHub to pull the code and give it a try. Run the policy engine once to personally experience what it feels like to have AI spending money blocked hard; the earliest movers will reap the most rewards. If you have USD1, go to Binance today to participate in the event, zero cost to share #WLFI , why not do it? How much money would you let your AI agent manage? What rules would you set for it? Have you run through AgentPay? Let’s discuss in the comments section. @worldlibertyfi #AgentPay #AIAgents #AD #ProjectResearch This article represents only personal opinions and does not constitute any investment advice, DYOR!
When I came across that tweet from Trump Jr., I was flipping through the technical documentation for AgentPay.

He said AI agents can think but won’t pay, just like a senior intern. I almost laughed out loud, but one sentence in the documentation stopped me.

"Every transaction must first pass the rules you set for yourself before it can be signed; there’s no way around it."

Earlier, money was like a pure obedient machine—Alipay, USDT, USDC—if you told it to move, it would move, never caring whether the money should be spent or if the address was reliable.

Now AI is starting to run its own strategies; it thinks if it should spend money, it just spends it directly. When you look back at the bill, you’re left confused, and it says, "I judged it reasonable at the time; do you dare to trust me completely?"

The most ruthless part of AgentPay is that it puts the rules in front of the signature. If AI wants to spend, is it over budget or is the address wrong? It doesn’t even get the qualification to sign; the money simply can’t move, and then it sends a push notification to your phone, waiting for your approval. The private key is still on your own device, and you set all the rules.

Now stablecoins are clearly divided into two types: USDT and USDC are the porters, responsible for delivering money from A to B quickly and accurately.

#USD1 combined with AgentPay is becoming a referee. Before moving money, a whistle is blown, and the whistle is completely in your hands. The default setting has changed from being able to move whenever to first passing the rules before moving; this is the real change in the game rules.

Recently, two events have simultaneously exploded in the market. @binance announced that holding USD1 will allow you to share 135 million $WLFI tokens, and the AgentPay SDK has officially gone open source. One grabs liquidity, and the other captures the rules layer. USD1 is clearly vying for the default currency position in the AI economy.

Developers, don’t just scroll through Twitter; hurry to GitHub to pull the code and give it a try. Run the policy engine once to personally experience what it feels like to have AI spending money blocked hard; the earliest movers will reap the most rewards.

If you have USD1, go to Binance today to participate in the event, zero cost to share #WLFI , why not do it?

How much money would you let your AI agent manage? What rules would you set for it? Have you run through AgentPay? Let’s discuss in the comments section.

@worldlibertyfi #AgentPay #AIAgents #AD #ProjectResearch

This article represents only personal opinions and does not constitute any investment advice, DYOR!
What if in the future, the one spending your money is not you?I just finished watching @worldlibertyfi's AgentPay SDK. To be honest, at first, I didn't take it too seriously. Words like AI, payment, SDK, etc., are everywhere now, and seeing too much of them can be a bit overwhelming. But the more I thought about it later, the more wrong it felt. It's not the feeling that this project is very impressive. Instead, this matter seems a bit off. I feel like we have always assumed that spending money must be done by a person. You transfer. You confirm. You bear the consequences. AI can help you calculate, help you see, help you remind. But spending money at this step is not yet its turn. But what WLFI is doing this time happens to change this premise.

What if in the future, the one spending your money is not you?

I just finished watching @worldlibertyfi's AgentPay SDK.
To be honest, at first, I didn't take it too seriously.
Words like AI, payment, SDK, etc., are everywhere now, and seeing too much of them can be a bit overwhelming.
But the more I thought about it later, the more wrong it felt.
It's not the feeling that this project is very impressive.
Instead, this matter seems a bit off.
I feel like we have always assumed that spending money must be done by a person.
You transfer.
You confirm.
You bear the consequences.
AI can help you calculate, help you see, help you remind.
But spending money at this step is not yet its turn.
But what WLFI is doing this time happens to change this premise.
Login to explore more contents
Explore the latest crypto news
⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
💬 Interact with your favorite creators
👍 Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number