76

Watching $ADI surge from $4 to $6.3, a 58% gain over 30 days—only to dip back for 3 more days now. The hardest part for people watching from the sidelines is this: chasing means risking being trapped in the middle of the pullback; not chasing means it might grind its way toward a new ATH of $8.

The actual market picture isn’t that complicated. It’s down 3.35% over 7 days, and another 3.68% in the last 24 hours. Volume has stayed steady at around 5–6M. There’s no panic selling and no obvious surge in buy orders. For the rally from 4.0 to 7.0, there hasn’t been sustained volume expansion accompanying the move—more like a natural cooldown after an uptrend with reduced volume. What I care about most is that it’s still 22% away from the ATH. It ranks #76 by market cap, but daily trading volume is only about 0.7% of its market cap. That level of trading activity can’t support a rapid breakout above the prior high. If it wants to return to an uptrend, it likely needs at least volume above 10M and to hold steady above $6.5. Otherwise, the current position looks more like a “too much of a run, time to rest” range where both bulls and bears are waiting for signals.

What sidelined participants need to confirm now isn’t “can it still go up,” but “if it pulls back, will you buy at a lower price?” The cost of chasing is the possibility of another 5–10% drop to $5.7–5.8. The cost of not chasing is that if it launches a second upswing, the feeling of missing out doubles. If the pullback doesn’t break below $5.8 and volume picks back up, that’s the relatively safer spot to test a position.

Final multiple-choice question: If you’re entering with a light position now, would you rather probe with a small trade around $6.3 with a set stop-loss—or wait until the $5.8–5.9 area before considering entry?

BonkDAO Treasury Targeted by Malicious Governance Proposal Attack @bonk_inu

A proposal called Sowellian BonkDAO—corresponding to Bonk Improvement Proposal #76 —was packaged as a governance reform plan. It proposed replacing members and the committees, rebuilding the DAO, reactivating assets, and also promised to distribute BONK rewards to addresses that vote in favor.

After the proposal passed, about 44 trillion BONK were transferred out of the BonkDAO treasury, valued at roughly $19.3 million to $20 million at the time. The funds flowed to a wallet ending with JHvQ. On-chain tracking shows that this address had previously received financial support from a Bybit account. Later the same day, these tokens were transferred again to another Solana address ending with eh42. As of now, the BONK rewards that were promised to the participants who voted in favor have not been actually distributed.

The attackers did not crack private keys or exploit any disclosed contract vulnerabilities. The attack path occurred at the governance layer. The attackers first accumulated BONK holdings and voting power in advance using multiple exchange wallets, then submitted a proposal with high-risk execution permissions into the governance process at BonkDAO. BonkDAO later confirmed the details and identified the portions of exchange wallets that had been used to buy BONK before the proposal. External on-chain analysts previously estimated that to obtain enough voting power, the attacker may have spent only around $4 million worth of BONK, yet ultimately drained nearly $20 million from the treasury.

Once the news spread, BONK fell by nearly 10%. Upbit immediately paused BONK deposits and withdrawals, and Kraken also took similar measures. The core goal was to prevent the attacker from moving the stolen funds into centralized platforms and converting them into stablecoins or fiat. BonkDAO has notified law enforcement agencies and is working with exchanges, cross-chain bridges, and the Solana Foundation to track the funds, seek freezes, and recover assets

HOW A HACKER STOLE @bonk_inu VIA THE “VOTE” BUTTON — A $16 MILLION SCHEME!

The attacker simply bought $BONK for $4 million and created an official DAO proposal BIP #76

The essence is to transfer 4.4 trillion tokens to his wallet. The deal was left open for 7 days, but neither the team nor the holders noticed the trick at all!

In the final seconds, the hacker voted “YES” with his volume.

The proposal was approved, the tokens flew out, and the hacker dumped them into the order book, taking home a clean $16 million profit!

Now the team is running around to law enforcement agencies trying to get the funds back. A DAO is just a joke.

#BONK #crypto

$DOGE is trading at $0.07838, up 2.28% in the last 24 hours - but that’s not the story. What’s striking is the 523, 744, 345 DOGE volume, a number that suggests something bigger is moving.

DOGE is sitting in a tight range, with its 7-day gain of 5.9% contrasting sharply with its 30-day loss of 3.8%. That’s a classic sign of short-term buying, not long-term conviction. And while $ADA is up 11.65% in 24 hours, DOGE’s volume is over 1.5 times higher - a clear indicator of where the action is.

The question is: is this just noise, or is DOGE setting up for a move?

Defense or offense - one word.

—
Not financial advice. Crypto assets are high-risk; do your own research.

📌 Hotspot Watch · #76

#CryptoTrends #CryptoSighted $DOGE

#76 WHAT IS YOUR GREATEST WEAPON ?

#DayTradingStrategy
#HODLTradingStrategy
#BTCWhaleMovement
#NFPWatch

$BNB
$BTC
$SOL

We're excited to share the latest trending tokens with our community. According to CoinGecko, top tokens like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) are making waves 🚀.

We're seeing a mix of established and emerging tokens on the list, including Solana (SOL) and Zcash (ZEC). Other notable mentions are NEAR Protocol (NEAR) and Bittensor (TAO), which are gaining traction. Venice Token (VVV) is also on the rise, with a market cap rank of #76.

We're committed to keeping our community informed about the latest market trends 💡. With so many exciting tokens to choose from, we're confident that our users will find opportunities that align with their investment goals 📈. We're looking forward to seeing how these tokens perform in the future 👍

$BABY , $ALLO , $CLO

Contract Quantitative Brief #76 | Today, just focus on these two, don’t chase the third one

Market Status:
The trend is still intact, funding rates are generally manageable, prioritize targets where the trend hasn’t broken and the pullback isn’t deep.

Top Candidates:
1) ALLOUSDT
Reason for Selection: The price surge and trading volume are solid, strong short-term continuation, funding rate is neutral, indicating it's not a purely crowded long.
Watch Level: Can it hold near the 20-day line after a pullback?
Trigger Condition: Regain stability and increase volume, continue the upward move.
Invalidation Condition: Break below the pullback low and weaken with high volume.

2) STGUSDT
Reason for Selection: The 1-hour chart and trading volume are still holding, open interest (OI) is rising as well, indicating there’s still capital willing to take over.
Watch Level: Can it hold around 0.26?
Trigger Condition: Stabilize and continue to rise.
Invalidation Condition: Surge fails to continue and falls back below the watch level.

Backup Observation/Not Chasing:
VELVETUSDT feels more like a pullback after an emotional spike; there’s strength, but it’s not a comfortable chase for long positions.

Risk Warning:
The biggest fear in short-term trading is a sudden volume spike after a strong consensus, especially if you're chasing during an acceleration phase; the margin for error will be very tight.

In Summary:
I will focus on ALLOUSDT and STGUSDT first, the third one is just for observation, I’ll wait for confirmation before making a move.