Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
102 Following
23.4K+ Followers
12.6K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Does Vanar Chain attract builders with cool tools or with incentives?
When looking at how Vanar Chain attracts builders, I don't see them focusing on incentives in the usual sense of crypto.
Vanar seems to understand that, so they choose a slower approach: trying to make the building process less painful.
Instead of talking a lot about token rewards, Vanar $VANRY focuses on tools and design assumptions.
Builders are not forced to on-chain every logic, do not have to think too much about gas for each small action, and can design products around user experience rather than token mechanics.
If these tools are good enough, builders will stay because they build faster and have lower risk, not because of short-term incentives.
In my opinion, the final question remains: Does Vanar have enough patience to allow tools to create natural attraction, or will they have to return to the familiar path of incentives?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
When looking at how Vanar Chain attracts builders, I don't see them focusing on incentives in the usual sense of crypto.
Vanar seems to understand that, so they choose a slower approach: trying to make the building process less painful.
Instead of talking a lot about token rewards, Vanar $VANRY focuses on tools and design assumptions.
Builders are not forced to on-chain every logic, do not have to think too much about gas for each small action, and can design products around user experience rather than token mechanics.
If these tools are good enough, builders will stay because they build faster and have lower risk, not because of short-term incentives.
In my opinion, the final question remains: Does Vanar have enough patience to allow tools to create natural attraction, or will they have to return to the familiar path of incentives?
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
How does Plasma XPL change the DeFi user experience?
In my experience, I realize that @Plasma does not make DeFi 'more', but changes the feeling of using DeFi. The change is not in new products, but in the rhythm of interaction.
On familiar DeFi chains, users always have to think before acting: how much is the fee, is it worth making this small transaction, or should I wait for the network to be less busy.
Plasma $XPL minimizes most friction at the payment layer. When transferring stablecoins becomes fast, stable, and almost effortless, DeFi begins to be used in a more granular way.
Users are willing to send, withdraw, and rebalance with smaller amounts more frequently. DeFi feels less like capital optimization and more like a continuous flow of finance.
However, Plasma does not expand the DeFi frontier, does not create new yields or deep composability, it simply reduces the hindrance at the underlying money layer.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
In my experience, I realize that @Plasma does not make DeFi 'more', but changes the feeling of using DeFi. The change is not in new products, but in the rhythm of interaction.
On familiar DeFi chains, users always have to think before acting: how much is the fee, is it worth making this small transaction, or should I wait for the network to be less busy.
Plasma $XPL minimizes most friction at the payment layer. When transferring stablecoins becomes fast, stable, and almost effortless, DeFi begins to be used in a more granular way.
Users are willing to send, withdraw, and rebalance with smaller amounts more frequently. DeFi feels less like capital optimization and more like a continuous flow of finance.
However, Plasma does not expand the DeFi frontier, does not create new yields or deep composability, it simply reduces the hindrance at the underlying money layer.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Have recovery signals for Bitcoin appeared?
Have recovery signals for Bitcoin appeared?
Recently, I have noticed that the crypto community has started to discuss more about the possibility of Bitcoin entering a new recovery phase.
After an extended adjustment period, Bitcoin's price has shown quite positive reactions at important support levels.
Personally, I believe that, although we cannot confirm that a strong upward trend has returned, some notable recovery signals have gradually emerged.
Recently, I have noticed that the crypto community has started to discuss more about the possibility of Bitcoin entering a new recovery phase.
After an extended adjustment period, Bitcoin's price has shown quite positive reactions at important support levels.
Personally, I believe that, although we cannot confirm that a strong upward trend has returned, some notable recovery signals have gradually emerged.
Does Vanar Chain create long-term competitive advantages for developers?
When talking about long-term competitive advantages for developers, I always find this to be the hardest question, and also the most genuine question.
Users may come and go in cycles, but developers only stay when they feel they are building something with a future.
Therefore, with
, the question is not 'do developers like it', but: Does Vanar help developers build better, cheaper, and less risky products over time?
Users may come and go in cycles, but developers only stay when they feel they are building something with a future.
Therefore, with
, the question is not 'do developers like it', but: Does Vanar help developers build better, cheaper, and less risky products over time?
How will Plasma XPL operate when the market is volatile?
When asking @Plasma how it will operate in a volatile market context, I think this question touches more on the essence of Plasma than asking about price.
Because Plasma is not designed to react to price volatility in a way that 'can withstand a pump or dump', but to handle something much more unpleasant: the behavioral volatility of cash flows. And these two types of volatility do not overlap.
In times of market stress, the first thing that happens is not that people stop trading, but that they shift from risk to stability.
Because Plasma is not designed to react to price volatility in a way that 'can withstand a pump or dump', but to handle something much more unpleasant: the behavioral volatility of cash flows. And these two types of volatility do not overlap.
In times of market stress, the first thing that happens is not that people stop trading, but that they shift from risk to stability.
On-chain: Ethereum activity is rising rapidly
On-chain warning: Ethereum activity is rising rapidly
On-chain data shows that activity on the Ethereum network is heating up quite clearly. The transaction volume $ETH based on the 14-day moving average has just reached about 1.17 million transactions – a value not too far from what appeared around major cycle peaks in 2018 and 2021.
When the number of transactions spikes in a short time, this often reflects that money flow and attention are returning to the network.
On-chain data shows that activity on the Ethereum network is heating up quite clearly. The transaction volume $ETH based on the 14-day moving average has just reached about 1.17 million transactions – a value not too far from what appeared around major cycle peaks in 2018 and 2021.
When the number of transactions spikes in a short time, this often reflects that money flow and attention are returning to the network.
About half of the Bitcoin supply is currently in profit according to on-chain data
I realize it has been quite a while since I last looked at the profit ratio of supply $BTC . Currently, this number is at 50.31%, corresponding to a price of about $62,839.
Essentially, this is a fairly 'real' on-chain indicator: it measures the percentage of Bitcoin whose last movement was at a price lower than the current price — in other words, how many coins are in profit compared to their on-chain cost basis.
Essentially, this is a fairly 'real' on-chain indicator: it measures the percentage of Bitcoin whose last movement was at a price lower than the current price — in other words, how many coins are in profit compared to their on-chain cost basis.
Does Vanar Chain depend too much on tokens?
In my experience, whether @Vanar depends too much on tokens must consider many factors.
With Vanar, tokens clearly still play a role in network security, transaction fees, and economic coordination.
But the point I observe is that they do not design the system around the idea that users must hold tokens to act. Most use cases that Vanar targets in digital entertainment, PayFi, and small transaction flows assume that end users do not want and should not think about tokens.
Therefore, Vanar $VANRY tries to push tokens out of the front line of the experience, keeping them at the infrastructure layer.
In my opinion, the real risk lies elsewhere. If the actual usage is not large enough, tokens will bear the expectations instead of the system, my friend.
@Vanar #vanar $VANRY
In my experience, whether @Vanar depends too much on tokens must consider many factors.
With Vanar, tokens clearly still play a role in network security, transaction fees, and economic coordination.
But the point I observe is that they do not design the system around the idea that users must hold tokens to act. Most use cases that Vanar targets in digital entertainment, PayFi, and small transaction flows assume that end users do not want and should not think about tokens.
Therefore, Vanar $VANRY tries to push tokens out of the front line of the experience, keeping them at the infrastructure layer.
In my opinion, the real risk lies elsewhere. If the actual usage is not large enough, tokens will bear the expectations instead of the system, my friend.
@Vanar #vanar $VANRY
The core difference between Plasma XPL and popular L2s
Hello everyone, on this new day I realize the difference between @Plasma and popular L2s does not lie in TPS or fees but in the fact that this system is built to serve which behavior first.
As you can see, most L2s are created to scale Ethereum, maintaining a multi-purpose spirit. DeFi, NFT, airdrop coexist on the same blockspace.
When the market is calm, the money transfer experience is quite good. When the ecosystem is hot, payments must compete with behaviors willing to pay higher fees.
Plasma $XPL starts from the opposite assumption. Transferring stablecoins is the core workload. Blockspace is almost exclusively reserved for payments.
In my opinion, fees can be subsidized at the experience level, so you don’t need to hold the native token or think about gas. This difference is significant.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Hello everyone, on this new day I realize the difference between @Plasma and popular L2s does not lie in TPS or fees but in the fact that this system is built to serve which behavior first.
As you can see, most L2s are created to scale Ethereum, maintaining a multi-purpose spirit. DeFi, NFT, airdrop coexist on the same blockspace.
When the market is calm, the money transfer experience is quite good. When the ecosystem is hot, payments must compete with behaviors willing to pay higher fees.
Plasma $XPL starts from the opposite assumption. Transferring stablecoins is the core workload. Blockspace is almost exclusively reserved for payments.
In my opinion, fees can be subsidized at the experience level, so you don’t need to hold the native token or think about gas. This difference is significant.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
$ETH has bought DCA This segment many brothers are still waiting for the bottom a lot
In my opinion, this segment spreading out to buy DCA spot is fine, many guys still want to catch the bottom immediately
There is no buying point, only reasonable buying zones, brothers
My entry is spread from 2k8, if it breaks again, then I will DCA more.
Is there anyone starting DCA $ETH like me?
$ETH
👇
In my opinion, this segment spreading out to buy DCA spot is fine, many guys still want to catch the bottom immediately
There is no buying point, only reasonable buying zones, brothers
My entry is spread from 2k8, if it breaks again, then I will DCA more.
Is there anyone starting DCA $ETH like me?
$ETH
👇
Sourced by user sharing on Binance
Bitcoin Approaching EMA 200 Weekly: Price Zone That Has Confirmed Every Cycle Bottom
From what I have observed in previous cycles, whenever Bitcoin finds a significant bottom – whether in 2019, 2020, or 2022 – the price always fluctuates around the EMA 200 weekly line.
This is not just a simple technical indicator, but in my opinion, it also reflects the psychological boundary between the bear market and the long-term accumulation phase.
Currently, $BTC is approaching the EMA 200 (W) zone very closely, and this particularly catches my attention. Two clear scenarios are unfolding.
This is not just a simple technical indicator, but in my opinion, it also reflects the psychological boundary between the bear market and the long-term accumulation phase.
Currently, $BTC is approaching the EMA 200 (W) zone very closely, and this particularly catches my attention. Two clear scenarios are unfolding.
Ethereum May Hit Bottom Before Bitcoin: Signs from the Altcoin Liquidity Cycle
In my observation, the price of Ethereum is likely to hit bottom a few months earlier than Bitcoin. This is not too surprising, as altcoins – especially $ETH – often have faster and stronger liquidity cycles compared to $BTC .
When the market enters a deep correction phase, the outflow of money from altcoins also occurs more fiercely, causing them to hit bottom earlier but also to recover earlier.
When the market enters a deep correction phase, the outflow of money from altcoins also occurs more fiercely, causing them to hit bottom earlier but also to recover earlier.
BTC loses the milestone of 74,000 USD, returns to the accumulation price range lasting 8 months
The price level of 74,000 USD for BTC clearly cannot last long. Currently, the price is gradually returning to the trading range of 2024, which is the period before Mr. Trump was elected.
During that time, the price movement was quite volatile and $BTC fluctuated around this area for nearly 8 months, so this is not a milestone that can be taken lightly.
In my opinion, the best approach right now is to patiently wait and observe where the price will stabilize, from which to assess whether BTC will begin to accumulate and fluctuate back or not. Areas with high trading volumes often give quite clear signals about where support may form.
During that time, the price movement was quite volatile and $BTC fluctuated around this area for nearly 8 months, so this is not a milestone that can be taken lightly.
In my opinion, the best approach right now is to patiently wait and observe where the price will stabilize, from which to assess whether BTC will begin to accumulate and fluctuate back or not. Areas with high trading volumes often give quite clear signals about where support may form.
Vanar Chain: The first AI-native Layer 1 for Web3 – Why is it different?
When I hear the phrase 'AI-native Layer 1', my first reflex is skepticism. Crypto has previously attached too many buzzwords to everything: AI, Web3, metaverse. And then most just stops at surface-level integration.
Therefore, the question for me is not whether @Vanar to use AI or not. But where AI is in the system design, and whether it truly changes how blockchain is used or not.
Most current chains see AI as an application running on top. AI is a trading bot, an agent responding to users, a data analysis tool off-chain. The underlying blockchain is almost unaware of AI's existence.
Therefore, the question for me is not whether @Vanar to use AI or not. But where AI is in the system design, and whether it truly changes how blockchain is used or not.
Most current chains see AI as an application running on top. AI is a trading bot, an agent responding to users, a data analysis tool off-chain. The underlying blockchain is almost unaware of AI's existence.
Bitcoin hits 15-month low amid cryptocurrency liquidations
The price of Bitcoin has dropped to its lowest level in 15 months, falling below the threshold of 73,000 USD, amid a wave of liquidations in the cryptocurrency market exceeding 800 million USD in just the past 24 hours.
When looking at the price chart during the US session, I can clearly see the selling pressure increasing significantly at the times of thinnest liquidity.
Data from TradingView shows that $BTC /USD at one point dropped below 72,500 USD on Bitstamp, breaking the previous local low. The brief recovery above 76,000 USD was quickly sold back down.
When looking at the price chart during the US session, I can clearly see the selling pressure increasing significantly at the times of thinnest liquidity.
Data from TradingView shows that $BTC /USD at one point dropped below 72,500 USD on Bitstamp, breaking the previous local low. The brief recovery above 76,000 USD was quickly sold back down.
Should you invest in XPL in 2026? An analysis of risk-reward
When asking whether to invest in @Plasma XPL in 2026 or not, the first thing I must set aside is the market's familiar reflex: searching for narrative. Plasma is not the type of project that can tell stories easier in a bull market.
It does not promise a quick 're-rate' thanks to new technology or new DeFi. If you look at XPL through that lens, it is easy to conclude wrongly from the start.
Plasma, by nature, is not designed to capitalize on market euphoria, but to leverage something rarely discussed in crypto: stable, repeated, and cost-sensitive cash flow. Stablecoins are the clearest example.
It does not promise a quick 're-rate' thanks to new technology or new DeFi. If you look at XPL through that lens, it is easy to conclude wrongly from the start.
Plasma, by nature, is not designed to capitalize on market euphoria, but to leverage something rarely discussed in crypto: stable, repeated, and cost-sensitive cash flow. Stablecoins are the clearest example.
Bitcoin and Fear: Why Investors Self-Sabotage Compound Returns
In the four most recent major bear market periods – 2018, 2020, 2022, and now 2025 – I see a repeating pattern with almost brutal accuracy.
When fear reaches its peak, the majority always chooses to flee. And I have been very close to making that decision before.
Data on capital flows from U.S. mutual funds, ETFs, to stocks, always the same. Capital is withdrawn most strongly at the worst times. Not because long-term fundamental factors suddenly disappear. But because the pain felt in the short term exceeds human emotional endurance.
When fear reaches its peak, the majority always chooses to flee. And I have been very close to making that decision before.
Data on capital flows from U.S. mutual funds, ETFs, to stocks, always the same. Capital is withdrawn most strongly at the worst times. Not because long-term fundamental factors suddenly disappear. But because the pain felt in the short term exceeds human emotional endurance.
Vanar Chain vs Ethereum: Comparing speed, cost, and AI integration
As you can see, when comparing Vanar Chain with Ethereum in terms of speed, cost, and AI integration, I always view these two systems as addressing two different problems.
Ethereum is a standard settlement layer, prioritizing security and a high degree of decentralization.
From my perspective, slow confirmation speed and high gas fees are difficult to avoid, especially unsuitable for applications with high-frequency repetitive behaviors.
Vanar $VANRY does not try to compete for that role. They choose to optimize for fast speed and near-zero costs, serving games, digital content, and PayFi, where the user experience would collapse if every interaction had to consider gas.
This is a deliberate trade-off, accepting a narrower scope in exchange for a smoother experience. Regarding AI integration, Ethereum currently leaves much of the logic at the application layer, while Vanar brings AI down to this operational layer.
@Vanar #vanar $VANRY
As you can see, when comparing Vanar Chain with Ethereum in terms of speed, cost, and AI integration, I always view these two systems as addressing two different problems.
Ethereum is a standard settlement layer, prioritizing security and a high degree of decentralization.
From my perspective, slow confirmation speed and high gas fees are difficult to avoid, especially unsuitable for applications with high-frequency repetitive behaviors.
Vanar $VANRY does not try to compete for that role. They choose to optimize for fast speed and near-zero costs, serving games, digital content, and PayFi, where the user experience would collapse if every interaction had to consider gas.
This is a deliberate trade-off, accepting a narrower scope in exchange for a smoother experience. Regarding AI integration, Ethereum currently leaves much of the logic at the application layer, while Vanar brings AI down to this operational layer.
@Vanar #vanar $VANRY
Login to explore more contents