I have always believed that $BTC itself has no inherent driving force.
Its value is always set by the pricing given to it from the outside.
Its value is driven by the progress of all of web3.
Its value is determined by the value of countless valuable encrypted currencies.
BTC only has two meanings: storage and trading, with trading making up the majority.
The way I buy BTC now is simply through daily dollar-cost averaging (DCA), with a small amount.
My portfolio allocation will never allocate BTC to a level higher than the allocation to ZEC.
The Pow of $ZEC is almost identical to BTC, but ZEC has full privacy protection capabilities. ZEC has inherent value.
So why not allocate more to ZEC?
#隐私赛道
Its value is always set by the pricing given to it from the outside.
Its value is driven by the progress of all of web3.
Its value is determined by the value of countless valuable encrypted currencies.
BTC only has two meanings: storage and trading, with trading making up the majority.
The way I buy BTC now is simply through daily dollar-cost averaging (DCA), with a small amount.
My portfolio allocation will never allocate BTC to a level higher than the allocation to ZEC.
The Pow of $ZEC is almost identical to BTC, but ZEC has full privacy protection capabilities. ZEC has inherent value.
So why not allocate more to ZEC?
#隐私赛道
