The crypto influencers who 'always get it right' are like the friend who predicts the outcome of the game after it has already ended 😂—they give 3 stop losses, 3 targets, and margins so wide that they cover the entire spectrum, and in the end, they always say 'I warned you' because something had to go right.

It's entertaining, generates likes, and holds attention😅, but it doesn't generate wealth.

This is how the trick of those who 'never make mistakes' works:They give 3 targets above, 1 stop loss below, and a margin of 4,000 dollars.Whatever happens… they always told you so

Brother… while you like that circus, institutions (BlackRock, Fidelity, MicroStrategy) just made the master move of the year without making a single blessed tweet. 😇

And today I am going to tell you exactly how they did it, with real data, and why their nets are so consistent. 😂

First, how they enter: institutions do not buy in euphoric FOMO, but in moments of calculated capitulation, when there is panic. As the price fell from $126k to $80k, BlackRock injected $2.1 billion into its IBIT ETF, and Fidelity $1.2 billion. Coincidence? No 🤔

They enter with staggered purchases: 30% on the first dip (e.g., $85k), 40% on the second ($82k), and 30% at the confirmed floor ($80k), ensuring an entry average of $82k. This is not luck; it’s on-chain analysis. The result: when the price rebounds to $92k, their net is +$600 million in 2 weeks, without leverage. 🤑

Now, the timing of exits: institutions do not sell in panic or euphoria, they rebalance at predefined milestones. In July 2025, when BTC reached $126k, Fidelity rotated $0.4 billion of BTC to ETH ETFs, capturing +20% in ETH before its correction. 😎

They exit in blocks: 20% on the first peak (e.g., $120k), 30% on the second ($126k), and 50% on the extended ($130k+), maintaining 40-60% exposure for the long term. Chainalysis data for 2025 shows that this strategy generated nets of +$15 billion for funds like Grayscale in the 2024-2025 cycle, with a 70% retention post-sale for hedging. It's not perfect timing; it’s automatic rules, selling automatically if the price were to touch $130k and buying if it drops to $110k, minimizing emotions. 🤷

And the net gains: in 2025, institutions have reported +$21.6 billion in crypto holdings.

  • BlackRock leading with $40 billion in ETF AUM (Farside).

  • MicroStrategy, for example, entered at $16k (2022) and partially exited at $69k (2024), net +$2 billion, but retains 250k BTC for the upside in 2026.

The secret: they do not take "everything" at a peak — they rebalance 2% annually, converting volatility into compounding. Compared to influencers who "get it right" 20% of the time with wide margins (3 stops of $5k each, targets of $10k), institutions get it right 70% because they use on-chain data and do not predict — they execute rules. 🤫

In summary, the "always correct" influencers with their ambiguous margins are entertainment; institutions with precise rules are wealth. You don’t need to be BlackRock; you need to be consistent.

#BinanceBlockchainWeek #BTCVSGOLD

PAXG
PAXG
4,232.14
+0.84%

Share if you have stopped following those who "always get it right" and started copying those who always win. 😏🧠