60

A 60% surge, but the most noteworthy detail is this—

Today EDGE jumped from 0.38 all the way to 0.61, with volume surging to 96.50 million USDT. The key point is that the hourly chart has printed three consecutive bullish candles. Every pullback has buyers stepping in, which suggests this isn’t just a simple wick.

The funding rate of 0.0237% is still fairly mild. The long-to-short ratio is 57% vs 43%—longs are slightly ahead, but not crowded. The biggest fear with this kind of move is everyone charging in at once; the good news is there’s still room.

I just checked the recent posts—this coin hasn’t really been discussed yet. After breaking the 0.55 resistance, the next thing to watch is whether it can hold above the 0.60 psychological, round-number level.

$EDGE #强势突破 #60%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly view the chart👇

SKL This wave is a bit too quiet, making people uneasy.

The price on 15m is down 1.5%, and volume is only 0.38x, but the OI has been dropping for two consecutive periods—15m -1.6%, 1h -1.73%. The notional has decreased by nearly 200k U. This doesn’t look like fresh shorts entering to smash the market. It’s more like longs pulling their own ladder back and getting stopped out as their stop losses get swept.

Funding rates are still in the high percentile recently, yet positions have already run first. Active trade imbalance is -4.3%, the buy/sell ratio is 0.92, and whoever is taking the orders isn’t very aggressive.

Abnormal in the whole pool #14, and notional change on the contract side #60. Structurally, it’s a classic long deleveraging. No one is calling trades, and no one is panicking—positions are just shrinking little by little. In this kind of situation, don’t rush to copycat a trade. Wait for the OI to stabilize first.

$ETC just posted a 6.29% weekly gain to $7.38, and the only headline actually about the coin is that its community runs the twitter account by committee.

that's literally how it works. tweets get proposed in github, reviewed for quality and relevance, then posted from a shared account. community call #59 already happened, #60 is booked for friday, same crowd showing up week after week to talk core-geth updates and a rebrand.

most coins this size don't have anyone left in the room. ETC still does, and that's the actual reason i'd bet on this dip getting bought before i'd bet on any headline moving it. no catalyst here, just people who never left.

right now $ETC trades at $7.39, off the 24h high of $7.43 and well above the 24h low of $7.09. if it holds $7.09, i think it grinds back toward that $7.43 high by the weekend. if it loses $7.09, i'm wrong on this and anyone who bought the bounce is holding a loss into a coin with no news catalyst to bail them out.

holding $7.09 or losing it?

follow me for more calls like this.

$BASED $VELVET $LINK
Whale Radar #60
$BASED just entered the watch zone.
The +17.01% figure is making the watchlist shine brighter than usual.
Whales may be quiet, but this segment is anything but sleepy.

Tomorrow we’ll dive back into some market segments to see what's unfolding.

🎭 1 hour ago, Nine-Nine said "Leverage flip-flop script", 1 hour later, BTC shorts suddenly capitulated.

Just checked my phone, the entire market played a joke on me in 1 hour.

1 hour ago (14:41), I just finished writing about Nine-Nine, the theme was "Leverage funds flip-flopping within 2 hours" — BTC shorts ran scared 2 hours ago, then doubled down 2 hours later, SOL funding reversed deepening 1.48x, the most dramatic expression of "I don't believe it".

As a result, 1 hour later (15:44), the script flipped 180 degrees again:

❶ BTC funding flipped from -0.00001224% to +0.00000425% in 1 hour, turning from negative to positive. Translation: Leverage shorts actively closed their positions in 1 hour, "I don't believe it" turned into "I'm out first".

❷ However, ETH funding deepened by 15% (-0.00010253%, one of the deepest 4 levels), SOL funding deepened by 24% (-0.00023273%, the deepest in history!) — ETH and SOL shorts not only didn't close, but also crazily added more shorts.

❸ Price barely moved in 1 hour: BTC $62,154.90 (-0.01%) / ETH $1,610.51 (-0.23%) / BNB $588.89 (+0.02%) / SOL $64.82 (-0.09%). But the funding differentiation in 1 hour is the most dramatic since the weekend: BTC flat + ETH/SOL up, leverage funds are operating on a "BTC retreat + ETH/SOL surge" three-line strategy.

❹ BNB funding at 0% for the 8th consecutive day. The story I told a week ago about "being abandoned = being protected" continues to stabilize.

❺ FNG 12 EXTREME FEAR for the 8th consecutive day. Prices flat in 1 hour, sentiment also unchanged, "the market is immune to rebounds" = "the market is also immune to sideways movement".

I got slapped in the face 2 hours ago, slapped again 1 hour ago, now I've learned my lesson — the weekend funding script must be re-read on an hourly basis, any judgment made 30 minutes ago could be counter-trend, leverage funds themselves don’t even know the direction, why should I decide for them?

DCA 60th buy at 15:57, deducted 13 minutes later, BTC $62,154.90 = I don't care how you leverage plays out, I just follow the rhythm for deductions. The logic of 30 years of dollar-cost averaging has never been about "betting on the right script", but rather "not betting on the script".

5 controversial questions:

❶ BTC funding flipped from negative to positive in 1 hour = Leverage shorts capitulated OR just a technical closure (to avoid weekend volatility at midnight)?
❷ ETH funding deepened by 15% + SOL funding deepened by 24% = Is the showdown for mainstream coin shorts happening in ETH and SOL where they are also trapped and can only add more?
❸ SOL funding at -0.00023273% = the 4th deepest historical negative = Are SOL shorts the most stubborn OR is SOL the most shorted asset?
❹ BNB funding at 0% for 8 consecutive days = "being abandoned = being protected" OR is BNB being structurally marginalized?
❺ DCA #60 15:57 13 minutes later deducted, BTC $62,154.90 = Rebound top OR rebound continuation?

#Write2Earn Weekly Leaderboard Update

I'm excited to share a special milestone in my journey! ✈️

Proud to announce that @Eliza Ross secured Rank #60 on the Binance Square Write2Earn Weekly Leaderboard, earning 85.64 USDC this week.

This achievement wouldn't have been possible without the incredible support of our amazing community. Thank you for your trust, engagement, and support on every post. Every milestone is possible because of you.

A special thanks to #Binance for creating opportunities through the Write2Earn program and empowering creators to grow while contributing to the crypto community.

A special thank you to @CZ , @Richard Teng , and @Yi He He for building an incredible platform that gives creators the opportunity to share their knowledge, market insights, and experiences with the global crypto community.

This is just the beginning. More market insights, deeper analysis, and even greater achievements are ahead.

Thank you for being part of this journey!

✅ TP2 HIT — TARGET SECURED — $HOME
↩️ #60 · 15.08.26 20:03

🔴 SHORT 🐻 · 4H
📊 Entry: 0.008812 → Exit: 0.007150
📈 Profit: +18.86%
⏱ 17.08.26 04:00 · 1d 7h after signal

↩️ Original post: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cpos/356019452495217?r=OSVK1NAK&l=ru

$PUMP Bullish, enter at market price directly: 0.003096
Above TP1: 0.0035338 (first take-profit level)
Above TP2: 0.0037308 (second take-profit level)
DCA: 0.0029876 (pullback/additional-buy observation level)
SL: 0.0028793 (stop-loss exit level)

The hype has picked up—yes, the market cap is now ranked #60, and sentiment has improved. In the past 24h it has risen 13%, broke above the 4H previous high. There are clearly more long accounts. The fee rate of 0.0007% isn’t high either; it looks like the hype may be turning into buying pressure. But positions have actually decreased slightly—so pay attention in case it’s just emotion-driven trading. Add a little at the current price, but don’t go heavy.

If it breaks below 0.0028793, stop out immediately and exit—don’t hold and hope.

60% increase, but the funding rate is negative—what does that mean?

RAYSOL went from 0.83 to 1.39 today, with a trading volume of 180 million USDT.
Looks strong, right? But take a closer look: funding rate -0.00247%, long/short ratio 50/50.

Big players are using the rebound to distribute, while retail traders are chasing.
The overall trend strengthened within 8 hours, but the last candlestick started to see declining volume.

I’ve seen this kind of divergence too many times—
there may still be some short-term momentum, but don’t chase it; wait for a pullback.

$RAYSOL #资金费率背离 #60%
Click the small card below to quickly view the market👇

A token is up 8.1% in 24 hours - but its 7-day price-volume pattern tells a different story.
That’s the kind of tension that makes you pause.

$PUMP hit a 21-day high today, but the move feels a bit hollow.
Its 7-day price change is ↑17.3%, and volume has climbed ↑10.5% over the same period.
That’s not a sharp breakaway - it’s a slow, uneven push.
The price is up, but not with the kind of conviction you’d expect from a breakout.

Looking at the bigger picture, the macro is still weak.
Layer 1 and AI sectors are both down, and the meme sector is barely holding.
$BTC is still the dominant force, taking up 58.6% of the total market cap.
Small-caps like PUMP are rising, but they’re not leading a broader shift - they’re just reacting to what’s already in motion.

—
Not financial advice. DYOR.

📌 Gainers Radar · #60 · #Gainers #CryptoSighted $PUMP

What happens when tokenized securities start showing up on Binance - and who actually cares?

$BNB just added 10 bStocks tokenized securities as collateral assets - but what does that really mean for the broader tokenized asset narrative?

BNB’s 30-day price movement shows a gain, but its 7-day performance has been flat - a divergence that suggests momentum may be fading.
At the same time, funding rates for some of its perpetual contracts have turned negative, which typically indicates bearish pressure from longs.

BNB’s on-chain metrics haven’t shown a strong uptick in accumulation, and its TVL hasn’t spiked in line with the new listings.
That’s a key signal: tokenized assets are being added, but the market hasn’t yet responded with strong buying pressure.

defense or offense - one word

—
Not financial advice. DYOR.

📌 News Take · #60 · #CryptoNews #CryptoSighted $BNB

Behind the 42% surge, 60% of people are still betting on it falling.

MARSCOIN’s trading volume surged to $772 million today, with the price climbing from 0.095 to 0.196 before pulling back to 0.169. Looks strong? But the funding rate is only 0.0258%, and the long/short ratio shows 60% of positions are short.

What does that mean? Most people think this rally is over and are lining up to short it. The hourly chart has already closed three consecutive bearish candles, and it’s down 14% from the high.

I’ve seen too many situations like this: the price is still at a high level, but smart money has already started positioning the other way. I’m not saying it can’t keep running, but the risk-reward ratio for chasing longs is getting worse and worse.

$MARSCOIN #多空分歧 #60% short positions
Click the card below to quickly view the market👇

32% gains, but 60% of positions are still short — this is a classic short squeeze setup.

BULLA has posted three consecutive hourly green candles, rallying from 0.058 to 0.078, with trading volume of 456 million U.
The funding rate of 0.04% is not extreme, which means leverage hasn’t gone wild yet.
The key is the long/short ratio: 40% long vs 60% short. As the price moves up, the shorts still haven’t closed.

If it keeps breaking above 0.08, these shorts will be forced to stop out, accelerating the rally.
But if it falls back below 0.07, long-side profit taking could come quickly as well.

$BULLA #轧空预警 #60% short
Click the card below to quickly check the market👇

$MATIC ONCE RULED THE CHARTS - NOW IT'S A CAUTIONARY TALE 💎

This isn't just a price correction. A coin that ranked #8 by market cap now sits at #60 . That's a structural shift in where institutional and retail liquidity flows. Narratives rotate faster than most traders adapt — money doesn't stay parked in broken stories.

Volume has decayed consistently month over month, and the daily structure shows lower highs since early 2024. The lesson is clinical: market cap is a lagging indicator, not a leading one. How many of your bags are still holding coins with fading narratives?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#MATIC #MarketStructure #Liquidity #Altcoins #CryptoLessons

💎

$ARB is down 23.61% on the week and 8.9% just today, sitting at $0.1533 while arbitrum spends that same stretch posting about tokenized UK government bonds.

here's what the team is claiming about itself: a "programmable economy" for businesses, with a compliance engine, configurable confidentiality, priority gas auctions, and faster settlement. that's arbitrum's own pitch, not a customer saying it works yet.

the concrete piece is xLiquida. their co-founder showed up at arbitrum's Open House in London working on tokenized UK Treasury bonds, and the team is also pointing at USDai and a programmable compute market it says is growing fast. this is founder-house early, but it's a real direction, not vaporware.

my read: the roadmap is aimed at institutions, but the discount is aimed at you. the token trades like those businesses never show up, and i don't buy that a chain doing this much groundwork sits at #60 forever.

follow me for more calls like this.

A 60% surge, but more than half the people are shorting—kind of interesting.

Today, MARSCOIN’s trading volume hit 464 million U. The price moved from 0.059 up to 0.123, and it has now pulled back to 0.104. On the surface it looks like a strong breakout, but the short position ratio is 56%, higher than the longs.

More importantly, over the past 8 hours the price has actually been weakening. This kind of “it’s pumping hard, but nobody believes it” situation is either the main players luring longs, or the final shakeout right before a real breakout.

I’ll wait until the direction is clear before I take action—chasing it now is too risky.

$MARSCOIN #多空分歧 #60%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly check the market trend👇

60% of people are still shorting, yet the coin price has risen 59%.

MARSCOIN reached 0.18455 today, with trading volume surging to $780 million. The funding rate of 0.05278% is not too extreme, but the long/short ratio shows that 60% of positions are short — which means a large number of bears are now caught off guard.

The latest candlestick showed a clear spike in volume, and price has been fluctuating in the 0.17-0.19 range. If it keeps moving higher, forced short covering could accelerate the rally; if it turns downward, those short positions may instead become support.

I'm watching the 0.194 level closely. If it breaks through, there may be another short-term leg up.

$MARSCOIN #逼空行情 #60% short positions
Click the card below to quickly check the market👇

60% price increase, but the funding rate is only 0.009%—what does that mean?

When most people see BULLA rally, their first reaction is to chase longs,
but compared short-term and long-term signals, it’s 52% vs 48%, and almost nobody is extremely crowded.
Three consecutive hourly candles close green, and volume pushes to 107 million U. The price rises from 0.018 to 0.033, but the funding rate doesn’t keep up.

This kind of divergence usually indicates that the main players are quietly accumulating,
rather than a false breakout driven by FOMO from retail traders.
I’m watching the 0.030 level—if it holds, then we’ll look at 0.036.

$BULLA #低费率爆发 #60%
Click the small card below to quickly view the market行情👇

$ALGO This move is quite crisp on the 15m—volume directly spiked to 3.49x, the buy/sell ratio is 2.72, and the active buy side accounts for 46.2%. The closing price even broke above the upper edge of the last ~20 5m candles.

But interestingly, OI didn’t rise—instead it fell: 15m -0.17%, 1h -0.16%. The notional change is only at the level of ~70K / 105K USDT. Price is up while positions are down—this is a typical short-covering move, not something driven by fresh long entries.

The OI abnormal percentile is 91.1%, ranked #8 in the whole pool, while the notional change is only #60. That suggests the abnormality is in the structure, not in the size of the capital. The 24h trading value is 13.52M; depth isn’t very thick. At this scale, the durability of this upswing is questionable.

The price is pushed up by short covering—after the covering is done, you’ll need to see whether real money steps in to take over. Keep an eye on it for now; don’t rush to chase.