Congratulations, Mr. Kong! Ten “small goals” taken down with ease!
According to publicly available information, Kong Jianping indirectly holds about 18.98 million shares of Longxin Technology through Yifang Changda Fund (subscribed capital of 21.34 million).
Based on today’s opening price of RMB 49.5, the shares you hold are worth about RMB 940 million, with a return of about 44 times.
Is this the power of a Web3 ancient giant whale? It’s truly astonishing 😭
Seeing Sego deeply dissect BTC’s new fork— as a “weed” that entered the market during the BTC ecosystem era, I’ve been naturally curious about this, so I did some in-depth research.
Speaking of BTC forks, if you’ve interacted with inscriptions, you’re definitely familiar with things like BCH, BSV, and others—these were all produced by BTC forks.
Although in terms of scale these fork coins can’t shake BTC’s position, each one’s price trajectory comes from what is essentially fair market behavior, and their technologies are different. It’s hard to say which faction truly follows Satoshi Nakamoto’s decentralized intent.
More realistically: each fork is a positive for BTC holders. The logic is easy to understand ⬇️
In the long run, BTC itself won’t be siphoned off by fork coins, but “holders” can, out of thin air, obtain another kind of token that is equal in amount and freely transferable.
I’m emphasizing “holders,” because in the context of “fork airdrops,” the BTC you hold on a centralized exchange doesn’t actually belong to you. Whether you can receive the fork coins depends on whether the exchange will distribute them. Only BTC in an on-chain wallet can be fully controlled by you.
Now another BTC fork is coming ⬇️
A seasoned Bitcoin developer and economist, the proposer and main driving force behind BIP300/BIP301, Paul Sztorc (@Truthcoin), will launch a new fork, eCash (ECX) (@BTCdrivechains), on August 22 this year.
At that time, all BTC holders will receive ECX in equal quantity.
In fact, as early as April this year, when Paul published the fork announcement, eCash already drew unprecedented attention in the English-speaking community and among the BTC developer circles—it's just that the Chinese community has always been trapped in an information bubble.
Regarding this fork, personally, I will move the BTC held on exchanges to an on-chain wallet around August 22 to receive the ECX airdrop. As for the specific steps afterward, eCash’s official team will likely provide guidance.
One more thing: eCash also has its own official wallet. As a plugin wallet, it’s necessary that it be open source and have undergone audits and time-tested reliability. I’ll keep an eye on it, but I’m not in a rush to use it.
I believe the underlying force that allows the crypto world to endure long-term is a “risk-free yield rate” that’s higher than in the traditional world—not some get-rich-quick story that gets spread every three days. Otherwise, it would have already ended in chaos, just like the hype of trading sneakers or tea leaves in a chain-reaction.
Of course, when I say “risk-free” here, I’m not using the strict definition from economics, but rather a relatively risk-free level within the environment in which we operate.
In the traditional finance world, the risk-free yield rate is usually benchmarked to U.S. short-term Treasury yields, and it has long hovered in the 2%–5% range, currently around 3.80%.
In the crypto context, we typically treat stable return methods with higher safety factors as risk-free or low-risk yield rates.
Taking USD1 as an example: a Trump family–associated issuance + 100% reserve-backed cash equivalents such as U.S. dollar deposits and U.S. Treasuries + the ability to redeem 1:1 all together have made USD1 one of the benchmarks for yields in the crypto space.
Over the past six rounds of activities, USD1 has continued to provide high-yield incentives, with annualized returns maintained in the range of 4.94%–15.56%.
Although it may not sound very high, it is still significantly higher than U.S. short-term Treasuries—and that’s without even mentioning other countries that adopt tightening policies.
To a large extent, the USD1 program has retained speculative capital that might otherwise flow back to traditional finance. If the crypto world wants to gain incremental growth and develop long-term, it is impossible to do without yield opportunities like this.
Share a little trick for getting free Ctrip Platinum Diamond status ⬇️
Open the Ctrip app, search for the keyword “MasterCard,” go to the membership matching campaign page. Having different levels of MasterCard lets you exchange for different membership tiers.
- Platinum Card: match a quarterly Diamond membership - Benefits include 1 airport lounge visit, 2 high-speed rail lounge visits, etc. The Platinum card isn’t hard to get, and the “cost/value” isn’t too high
- World Card: match a one-year Diamond membership - The lounge benefits are the same as the Platinum card—just with 2x points acceleration, so it lasts longer
- World Elite Card: match a one-year Golden Diamond membership - 2 airport lounge visits, 6 high-speed rail lounge visits, 4 executive lounge visits, unlimited hotel breakfasts, unlimited room upgrades and late checkouts, select airline gold cards, Haidilao Black (sea black) membership, 2.5x points, etc. The “cost/value” here is definitely much bigger
But the problem is that the MasterCard World Elite is extremely hard to obtain. For the Visa equivalent Infinite, or UnionPay Diamond/Private Banking cards, you typically can’t get it without keeping a few million (around 6–7 million) in assets.
And this is where we have to mention the “Ping An Bank World Elite Card”—it’s arguably the most “watered down” World Elite card in history.
According to cardholders’ experience, in most areas you can deposit about 50k (offline card issuance) and it supports number selection; there are even cases where you can get it with a zero deposit. You can also waive one quarter’s management fee. If you don’t want to pay, just cancel it after it expires.
One more thing: Ctrip’s matching is for China-issued MasterCard, so MasterCards from other regions (like “blue lion” MasterCard) won’t work.
This route is absolutely the best way to get free Ctrip memberships—save it and start collecting 🚀
Compared with the same period five years ago, the BTC price is almost flat, while ETH has seen a clear drop. However, if you held Brazilian real and Mexican peso, you could have achieved nearly double the returns. In this article, we explore this case.
Today, with the development of RWA, ordinary US Treasuries, gold, US stocks, and the like no longer really spark much interest. Let’s talk instead about a super high-yield asset that was discussed in the early days of crypto, but has long attracted attention from macro traders and traditional institutions.
Brazilian real (BRL), Mexican peso (MXN)
BRL and MXN have become two of the most classic emerging-market currencies for global macro funds’ FX carry trades, thanks to their long-standing, significant positive interest-rate spreads.
- The Brazilian real (BRL) interest rate is still at 14.25% (as of June 2026, it has cut 25 bps for the third consecutive time, but remains extremely high).
- The Mexican peso (MXN) interest rate stands at 6.50% (after earlier large rate cuts, it is currently on hold).
For many years, global hedge funds / macro funds have continued to do carry on BRL and MXN.
In plain language, it’s basically: “borrow low-interest USD, buy these high-interest currencies.”
In essence, it’s very similar to how, on an exchange, you borrow USDT to buy USD1/USDG and earn the high yield.
The key difference is that the exchange rate between USDT and other stablecoins has been almost constant over the long term, but the USD-to-BRL and USD-to-MXN exchange rates have continued to fluctuate—in the past five years:
- BRL has appreciated 6.5% against the USD. - MXN has appreciated 16.4% against the USD.
When you combine interest rates with FX fluctuations, you can reach a stunning conclusion.
If you had invested $10,000 five years ago, the BRL portfolio would have turned into about $19,000, and the MXN portfolio about $18,000—while pure USD earning SOFR would only reach around $12,000. And that’s before even buying risk assets like BTC/ETH.
For a long time, investing in BRL or MXN had high entry barriers. Doing an FX carry trade was something only institutions could do. Recently, RWA projects have finally started to look at this.
The RWA tokenization platform Tenbin Labs (@tenbinlabs) was the first to focus on this.
Without local banks or dealing with capital controls, it enables ordinary users on the ETH chain to earn the real yield spread from high-interest emerging-market currencies like BRL and MXN, along with potential FX appreciation gains.
Synthetic USD Agreement: Ethena Scores Another Win in Official Partnerships
Ethena has officially announced a collaboration with RobinhoodCrypto, bringing Ethena’s product suite to the Robinhood Chain
More importantly, Steakhouse Financial has chosen Ethena as the primary collateral issuer for Robinhood’s first Crypto Earn product
This is the first directly available decentralized lending product within the Robinhood App ⬇️
- Users can lend USDG within the app via self-custody wallets, targeting an annual yield of about 7%; the underlying lending infrastructure is provided by the Morpho protocol
Entropy Advisors’ data director, Tom Wan, reports that the Robinhood Chain reached $200m TVL just one week after launch, with Ethena contributing about $59m, ranking second—outperforming many established protocols such as Spark and Uniswap
In June, Coinbase launched a High Yield USDC Vault, using USDe-related assets as core collateral; after launch it grew rapidly, surpassing $100m within days and exceeding $200m within a month
In less than a month, two major independent platforms—Coinbase and Robinhood—have both chosen USDe as the primary collateral asset for their yield/lending products
In addition, USDe has officially been added recently to BlackRock’s Aladdin platform
Aladdin is BlackRock’s investment and risk-management super system built for top global institutions, used by banks, asset managers, and pension funds that manage tens of trillions of dollars in assets
With this integration, institutional investors can access and configure digital dollar assets such as USDe more easily on the Aladdin platform
If during a bear market, crypto projects could achieve half the operational level of Ethena, we wouldn't be getting drained by the US stock market continuously.
Recently, Ethena has been skyrocketing down the RWA path, officially announcing deep collaborations with Janus Henderson and Centrifuge.
- Janus Henderson is a global asset management giant managing around $480 billion, focusing on active management of equities, fixed income, multi-asset, and alternative investment strategies.
- Centrifuge is a leading RWA tokenization infrastructure platform, focusing on bringing traditional financial assets onto the blockchain in a compliant way, providing tokenization, liquidity, and DeFi integration services to institutions.
This collaboration involves tight coordination among the three parties ⬇️
- Janus Henderson is bringing its renowned AAA-rated CLO strategy, JAAA, as a real-world asset.
- Centrifuge will create an on-chain tokenized version of Janus Henderson's JAAA strategy, enabling traditional assets to enter the blockchain in a compliant and efficient manner.
- Ethena will incorporate the tokenized JAAA into the collateral framework of USDe, marking the first non-T-Bills RWA collateral.
This inclusion has undergone independent due diligence by Ethena's risk committee, meeting the four standards of liquidity, credit quality, drawdown characteristics, and pricing transparency.
This collaboration marks Ethena's first inclusion of institutional-grade RWA that isn't T-Bills into the USDe collateral framework, and its significance is extraordinary.
In layman's terms, Ethena has stepped outside the traditional crypto industry's self-congratulatory bubble, with a traditional asset management company managing $480 billion putting real money on the line to say,
"We endorse this model, not only have we invested ourselves, but we're also ready to use it extensively."
I've been diving deep into trading U.S. stocks on Binance for several days now, and here's my take.
I've gathered and organized the trading fees for Binance and traditional U.S. brokerage firms, comparing them as shown in the image ⬇️
Overall, I found Binance to be more suited for mid to small-scale traders and crypto users as a primary platform for U.S. stock trading.
1/ Binance has no fixed platform fee and supports fractional shares, meaning you can trade with just a few bucks, making the entry barrier super low.
2/ There's no complicated U.S. dollar deposit process; you can buy and sell using USDC, which is a no-brainer for crypto users, easing the transition.
3/ The UI/UX is straightforward. If you've ever used the overly complex and hard-to-navigate IBKR, you'll really appreciate this point.
4/ Opening an account is easy, with no need for overseas funds or proof of address.
But to be honest, as a newcomer, Binance's U.S. stock trading still has a long way to go and should learn from traditional brokers.
For instance, for larger traders, the commission structure based on a fixed percentage of the trade amount isn’t cheaper than firms like Tiger, Cow, Bridge, or IBKR. The current commission reduction event is a good start for future improvements.
From another perspective, Binance's intention to enhance U.S. stock trading functionality isn't just to catch up to giants like IBKR in the brokerage space.
It's about niche competition, aiming to create a super financial complex that integrates crypto, stocks, and ETFs.
(This article is purely personal investment thoughts and does not contain any advice. Please comply with local laws and regulations.)
Not sure when RWA seemed to have reached parity with TradFi, but it feels like mentioning RWA only brings up tokenized US Treasuries, US stocks, and ETFs.
In reality, it's much broader than that; RWA encompasses the use of crypto to trade real assets across regions, including real estate, art, intellectual property, and more.
Since I hold a position in Ethena, I'm always keeping an eye on its developments.
Recently, Ethena officially announced a new white-label partnership ⬇️
VanEck and ALLIANCE Investments' "US Real Estate RWA" company Manifest has officially chosen Ethena to support its real estate collateralized token, USH.
What does this mean?
Manifest is tokenizing US residential property rights (HEIs) into USH, allowing global liquidity to participate in this $35 trillion market just like buying stablecoins.
- During the launch phase, 100% liquidity reserves are provided by USDe, and sUSH holders can immediately start earning rewards without waiting for the real estate portfolio to be fully established.
- Later, it will gradually adjust to 80% HEIs + 20% USDe, preserving the long-term appreciation of real estate while maintaining on-chain capital efficiency and composability.
- It addresses the common RWA issue of quick cash flow but slow asset realization; initial yields come from USDe with real estate gains to follow.
Additionally, Ethena's tokenized dollars have become the fastest-growing RWA asset on Solana, with its market cap recently surpassing $560 million.
I've been keeping an eye on three news pieces and noticed Ethena is making low-key strides.
1/ Jupiter Lend launched an isolated Ethena market.
- This is Jupiter Lend's first time bringing in traditional asset management curation, designed specifically for large-scale institutional capital, supporting USDe deposits, lending, and leverage strategies.
- After the market opened, it rapidly expanded to about $570 million, compared to just $50 million thirty days ago.
- Jupiter Lend's overall TVL has now surpassed $1 billion, boosted by the Ethena market.
2/ Kamino provides leverage strategies with liquidation protection for Ethena.
- Specifically, think USDe/USDG Multiply cycles, and so on, accelerating the adoption of USDe within the Solana ecosystem.
- This Ethena market has become Kamino's fastest project to break $500 million in TVL.
3/ Solana's official Twitter clearly supports ENA's launch, further confirming ecosystem consensus.
Connecting these three seemingly unrelated news pieces reveals a clear narrative.
Ethena's synthetic dollar is quickly becoming the core collateral in Solana DeFi, and Ethena is becoming an important capital choice for institutions participating in the Solana ecosystem.
In fact, with the rapid growth in TVL, Solana has already become the second largest public chain supporting Ethena after ETH.
As we move through this bear market, while BTC hasn't yet broken through the psychological barrier for most, the metrics like DeFi scale indicate that many retail traders have already thrown in the towel.
In this market backdrop, Ethena's ability to deeply integrate with the Solana ecosystem and see TVL growth is particularly impressive, inevitably backed by strong institutional support.
For a long time, Web3 has been all about the narrative of absolute decentralization and resisting sovereign control, and the market has been pretty bullish on it.
But the reality is harsh; when the self-congratulatory narrative bumps into the machinery of sovereign states, the consequences can range from minor losses to severe repercussions.
- Tornado Cash, which was hailed as a paragon by the black-hat and gray-hat communities, faced the iron fist of the U.S. Treasury in 2022. Two core founders are looking at 5 years or more in the slammer.
- Ripple, which was among the top five by market cap, has been in a tug-of-war with the SEC from 2020 to 2024, ultimately slapped with a massive $125 million civil penalty, alongside hundreds of millions in legal costs and wasted time, which really hurt the ecosystem.
- TON had plans to launch the largest ICO ever, but just before the mainnet went live, the SEC dropped an emergency injunction to shut it down. The founders were forced to abandon the project, refunding $1.2 billion to investors, and coughing up a $18.5 million fine—talk about a grand narrative going belly-up.
There are countless similar cases; while tech can be decentralized, teams can't be, and projects stand no chance against the state machinery.
So, cozying up to the government and striking deals with regulators isn't a retreat—it's actually a pragmatic mindset that should be embraced.
In this regard, IOTA, being an old-school project, has been doing quite well.
IOTA ditched the fantasy of decentralization and anarchy early on, focusing instead on reshaping itself into a foundational infrastructure that can integrate with traditional finance and government governance.
- Middle East Compliance Hub: Established a rigorously regulated IOTA Foundation, securing $100 million in backing from the UAE Trade and Technology Fund, targeting tokenized trade finance.
- International Collaboration: Partnered with organizations like the World Economic Forum to build the TWIN global trade network, making digital trade pilots in the UK and East Africa truly run on-chain—even having several UK government officials stationed full-time for up to 12 months.
- National-Level Cooperation in Three African Countries: The announced ADAPT plan designates Kenya, Morocco, and Nigeria as the first implementation countries, driven by the African Free Trade Area Secretariat, after rigorous selection across political commitments and regulatory readiness.
With these strategies in place, the risk of being hammered by sovereign entities has significantly decreased.
By strategically positioning itself in the payment and identity layers in the Middle East, Europe, and Africa, IOTA seemed to predict the global regulatory acceleration well in advance.
Those who can play with AI are practically becoming giants, you know?
In China's billion-dollar quantitative fund scene, Huanfang Quant has ranked second on the performance leaderboard with an average return of 56.6% in 2025.
Industry estimates suggest that Huanfang's potential management fees and performance bonuses exceeded $700 million last year.
Back in 2017, Huanfang fully pivoted to deep learning, applying AI algorithms to fully automated quantitative trading.
In Huanfang's strategy system, traditional fund managers are a thing of the past; decisions are entirely automated by models.
Coincidentally, on the other side of the world, Jane Street is raking in profits through high-frequency trading, ETF market-making, and statistical arbitrage deeply integrated with AI.
In 2025, Jane Street recorded a staggering $39.6 billion in net trading income, completely overshadowing traditional Wall Street giants like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs, becoming the first non-bank institution to crush top-tier banks in trading income.
On a per-employee basis, Jane Street generated over $11 million in revenue for each employee in 2025.
These two examples are just to illustrate a point.
Leveraging AI for trading is akin to running a money-printing factory; it's an absolute game-changer for humanity, especially for the average Joe.
So far, the crypto space hasn't seen a particularly mature AI trading platform. Aside from a few smug scientists and the eye-catching AI Arena, the average person has barely been able to tap into the rewards of AI trading.
Scrolling through Twitter, I saw that the prediction market NeoSoul has launched EvoEvo, which has surprisingly filled this gap first.
While it may not be traditional AI-driven trading, using AI for trading predictions can still be profitable—different paths lead to the same destination, so let’s chat about it.
From my understanding, EvoEvo is an ‘AI Prediction Bootcamp.’
Prediction -> Training -> Calibration -> Settlement.
Although the initial AI might just be some silly form that provides only emotional value, with continuous subjective tuning, mimicking high-win-rate AI parameters, and distilling insights from the pros, it may eventually evolve into a trading bot that can consistently profit and provide ‘sleep income.’
I've opened an Agent in each of the three fields: ‘cryptocurrency, sports, and geopolitics’ to test the waters.
So far, the prediction accuracy is leagues ahead of mine. I'll give it another week to assess the results, and if it holds up, I'm ready to follow suit with a cash experiment.
The crypto space is a high-cost financing environment.
What I mean is, even if you do nothing, as long as you stay in the crypto game long enough, you can outperform most others in the same timeframe.
Let's say you deposited $100,000 at the start of the first round of the Binance USD event, and just by clicking a few buttons every week to harvest your gains, without doing anything else.
In less than half a year, you could net nearly $3,600, which is about a 9.64% annualized return.
In other words, if you have $100,000 and you haven't made $3,600 or even ended up in the red this past six months, that's just not cutting it.
Like Charlie Munger said,
"What we need to do is not to look smart, but to avoid stupid decisions. Sometimes, doing nothing is the smartest move."
Right now, 78% of people in the world have never dabbled in AI. It's just that remaining 0.12%—the pro users in those three little squares—who are shaking up the entire industry.
What does this mean? The real penetration of AI hasn't even started yet.
What has always bridged this gap is not the strength of AI itself.
Tools like Doubao and GPT have been within reach for ages; the real hurdle lies in whether you can turn a vague demand into commands that AI can execute reliably.
This task requires pro users to spend a ton of time experimenting, while regular folks are left in the dark.
Speaking of which, I have to mention a project that's been covered by Xinzhi Yuan, Machine Heart, Geek Park, and Quantum Bit.
xBubble is an AI project launched by the DappOS team, which has received backing from Sequoia China and Yzi Labs, making it one of the hottest Web3 background AIs out there.
It positions itself as a Low-prompt AI Agent, meaning it's designed to teach AI how to use AI, allowing you to accomplish complex tasks with shorter requests.
When you look at a comparison of xBubble against other AIs for the same brief prompt, it’s easy to see that xBubble is more professional, clearly utilizing well-tuned SOPs to deliver results.
xBubble’s processing flow relies on two main components: Bubble Pilot and Bubble Engine.
Bubble Pilot: Smart Execution Hub
- Responsible for task delegation; once it receives a command, the Pilot matches SOPs in the background and selects the optimal path to complete the task. If no matching process is found, it automatically switches to a universal Agent as a fallback, ensuring responses are never empty.
Bubble Engine: Automated Evolution Engine
- Responsible for skill learning; for unknown tasks, the Engine generates multiple solutions through AI programming and tests them against each other. Once a quality-verified optimal path is established, it solidifies that as a reusable SOP/Skill, enabling continuous self-expansion of capabilities.
When the internet bubble burst, many concept stocks fell due to the inability to scale.
But now, AI is achieving self-iteration through projects like xBubble, meaning AI is learning from AI and even using AI.
Back to that initial 78%, the enhancement of productivity through AI shouldn't only belong to that 0.12%.
What xBubble aims to do is to enable those remaining folks who have never encountered AI to achieve professional-level output with just a simple statement of goals.
I wasn't fully awake this morning, and my alerts kept flashing. The early Alpha bloggers like Mirro, who are monitoring things like street trading and stir-fried noodles, are continuously piling into elizaOK. It looked familiar, so I grabbed a bit myself.
Later, I got up and remembered I had met Dev once in Hong Kong. Back then, their team took a photo with the big sister, striking an 'OK👌' pose, and she played along gracefully.
This was so funny that it left a strong impression on me 😂
Now, back to the asset itself, here are a few reasons supporting my buy-in for a gamble:
1/ The official Twitter face, Dev Baoger, is a core developer in the ai16z community.
2/ Shaw previously retweeted and CX'd about elizaOK.
3/ There's a clear strong whale; on-chain evidence shows bundled buys. Many criticize this, but I don’t see it as a bad thing. The experience brought by a powerful market maker far exceeds endless PvP. Whether elizaOK has a strong market maker is subjective.
4/ elizaOK took first place in the Fourmeme AI group.
I’m not shy about high control; it means someone has a strong interest tied to the project, and I prefer teams that are inclined to work long-term.
To put it bluntly, if I come across a team that’s publicly verified and hustled for a few months just to pull out a couple of grand, I’d accept that.
Based on the above reasons, I bought a few thousand, hoping for a breakout on a small exchange.
(This article is merely personal investment thoughts and does not contain any advice.)
I only realized it after seeing some banter that Trump is also getting into the game as a middleman
Speaking of middlemen, it’s definitely the hottest business these days, with OpenRouter, led by the co-founder of OpenSea, taking the lead, followed by Sun's new venture BAI
It seems like the big players looking to cash in on the new wave of AI are all eager to dive into the middleman scene
Considering my readers might not all be pros, let’s break down what an AI middleman does in simple terms
An AI middleman, also known as an LLM Router or API aggregator
In the past, ordinary players wanting to use various AIs (Claude, GPT, Gemini, etc.) had to register accounts on each platform, load funds, configure Keys, and switch back and forth, which was a hassle
The middleman's function is just as its name suggests:
- Register in one place, load funds once, and you can directly access hundreds of different AI models - It automatically routes requests to the most suitable official model behind the scenes - Due to the wholesale pricing of Tokens, it's usually cheaper than going directly through the official channels
For developers or heavy users, the biggest value of a middleman is saving time, cutting costs, and stability
Back to the Trump middleman mentioned at the start, it actually refers to the newly launched project WorldClaw (@WorldClawAI) within the WLFI ecosystem
It’s clear that the officials are taking this lane very seriously, with Trump Jr. and Eric Trump both publicly promoting the ecosystem
Within the WorldClaw system, the core powerhouse is called WorldRouter, which directly integrates over 300 mainstream models including Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and Qwen 3.6 Plus
Since it’s all about business, price is the most crucial factor, and the calling price for WorldRouter is directly 30% cheaper than that of Anthropic or OpenAI
The subscription prices offer four tiers: Token Plan $9.9 / $99 / $999 / $9,999 for users to choose from
Considering potential security and privacy issues with middlemen, I can give a solid endorsement to WorldRouter, which has a strong background and is still 30% cheaper
Additionally, it's worth noting that WorldRouter supports USD1 payments, undoubtedly contributing a real, massive consumption scenario for the WLFI ecosystem
Potential to Become Binance's Next Spot Listing in AI Infrastructure
I boldly speculate that Gensyn(@gensynai) will be the next Spot listing on Binance. The project token $AI TGE launch has snagged listings on 'Binance Perps / Binance Alpha / Coinbase / Bitget / Kucoin / Kraken', aligning with the usual patterns of AI infrastructure projects. This article only discusses the actual content, deconstructing my reasoning from three angles. ❚ Reason One: Binance is making concessions $AI Ticker Just two days ago, Binance quietly delisted multiple Spot pairs from the original AI Ticker owner Sleepless, and the next day, they took down its Perps pairs. I thought this was just a routine delisting operation, but it now seems to be intricately linked to Gensyn's TGE.