#acrossprotocol
acrossprotocol
36,533 views
128 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Across Protocol ($ACX ) recently faced multiple bearish blows:
Binance will delist it on August 17, tightening liquidity channels; it was then hit by a vulnerability attack of about $4.5 million, damaging trust; it has now been added to Binance’s monitoring list, putting market confidence under pressure.
At present, it is quoting $ACX at $0.03783, with a 24-hour trading volume of $13.2 million and a market cap of about $27.1 million. With the combined effects of the delisting, a trust crisis, and monitoring pressure, the short-term trend is not looking optimistic—investors should watch for further downside risk.
#ACX #AcrossProtocol
Binance will delist it on August 17, tightening liquidity channels; it was then hit by a vulnerability attack of about $4.5 million, damaging trust; it has now been added to Binance’s monitoring list, putting market confidence under pressure.
At present, it is quoting $ACX at $0.03783, with a 24-hour trading volume of $13.2 million and a market cap of about $27.1 million. With the combined effects of the delisting, a trust crisis, and monitoring pressure, the short-term trend is not looking optimistic—investors should watch for further downside risk.
#ACX #AcrossProtocol
Across Protocol ($ACX ) has recently faced consecutive headwinds, with clear downward pressure on the price.
First, on August 17, it was delisted by Binance, causing a sharp drop in liquidity and visibility; then it suffered a vulnerability attack worth more than $4.5 million, dealing a blow to trust; it has now been added to Binance’s monitoring list, and market sentiment has weakened further.
Currently, $ACX is quoted at $0.03783, with about $13.2 million in 24-hour trading and a market cap of only about $27.1 million left. With multiple negative factors piling up, investors should remain vigilant for further volatility driven by sentiment in the short term—do not blindly buy the dip.
What do you think will be the next direction for $ACX ? Let’s discuss in the comments below 👇
#ACX #AcrossProtocol
First, on August 17, it was delisted by Binance, causing a sharp drop in liquidity and visibility; then it suffered a vulnerability attack worth more than $4.5 million, dealing a blow to trust; it has now been added to Binance’s monitoring list, and market sentiment has weakened further.
Currently, $ACX is quoted at $0.03783, with about $13.2 million in 24-hour trading and a market cap of only about $27.1 million left. With multiple negative factors piling up, investors should remain vigilant for further volatility driven by sentiment in the short term—do not blindly buy the dip.
What do you think will be the next direction for $ACX ? Let’s discuss in the comments below 👇
#ACX #AcrossProtocol
Across Protocol ($ACX ) recent situation can be described as worsening conditions, with multiple negative factors combining to put pressure on the price.
First, it was delisted by Binance on August 17, and liquidity was directly drained; shortly after, it suffered a $4.5 million exploit, damaging trust in the protocol; now it has also been placed on Binance’s monitoring list, further suppressing market confidence.
From the data, the quote for $ACX is $0.03783, the 24-hour trading volume is $13.2 million, and the market cap has fallen to just $27.1 million. In terms of both liquidity and capital attention, it is clearly in a weak position.
The triple blow of delisting + exploit + monitoring is a heavy combination for a cross-chain protocol. In the short term, restoring confidence will take time, and capital conditions are unlikely to reverse quickly. The market is likely to continue showing weak sideways movement.
Operationally, it is recommended to remain cautious, not to blindly buy the dip, and to wait until the negative news is fully digested and on-chain data shows signs of stabilization before making a decision.
#ACX#AcrossProtocol
First, it was delisted by Binance on August 17, and liquidity was directly drained; shortly after, it suffered a $4.5 million exploit, damaging trust in the protocol; now it has also been placed on Binance’s monitoring list, further suppressing market confidence.
From the data, the quote for $ACX is $0.03783, the 24-hour trading volume is $13.2 million, and the market cap has fallen to just $27.1 million. In terms of both liquidity and capital attention, it is clearly in a weak position.
The triple blow of delisting + exploit + monitoring is a heavy combination for a cross-chain protocol. In the short term, restoring confidence will take time, and capital conditions are unlikely to reverse quickly. The market is likely to continue showing weak sideways movement.
Operationally, it is recommended to remain cautious, not to blindly buy the dip, and to wait until the negative news is fully digested and on-chain data shows signs of stabilization before making a decision.
#ACX#AcrossProtocol
Across Protocol（$ACX ）has recently, one could say, been plagued by “just when it rains, it pours.” First, it was placed on Binance’s monitoring list, with an expected risk of delisting in August 2026; then on July 17, it suffered a $4.5 million vulnerability attack; and on top of that, the smart money accounts are sitting on a large unrealized loss. With multiple negative factors stacking up, downward pressure on the token price is all but inevitable. Currently, ACX is quoted at $0.04058, with a 24-hour trading volume of $1.31 million, and a market cap of about $29.06 million. Overall liquidity has already tightened noticeably.
From the perspective of the on-chain cross-chain bridge sector, ACX’s technical narrative isn’t weak in itself, and its intent-driven bridging approach offers differentiated advantages in user experience. However, in the short to mid term, with three layers of pressure—delisting expectations, security incidents, and large holders exiting—there is unlikely to be any meaningful rebound in the near term. The real factors that could turn things around are either the team delivering substantive security remediation and compensation measures, or a broader recovery in market sentiment and liquidity. Until one of these happens, the risk-reward of “blindly bottom-fishing” isn’t attractive. It’s recommended to stay on the sidelines and wait for right-side signals before making a decision.
#AcrossProtocol#跨链桥#风险预警
From the perspective of the on-chain cross-chain bridge sector, ACX’s technical narrative isn’t weak in itself, and its intent-driven bridging approach offers differentiated advantages in user experience. However, in the short to mid term, with three layers of pressure—delisting expectations, security incidents, and large holders exiting—there is unlikely to be any meaningful rebound in the near term. The real factors that could turn things around are either the team delivering substantive security remediation and compensation measures, or a broader recovery in market sentiment and liquidity. Until one of these happens, the risk-reward of “blindly bottom-fishing” isn’t attractive. It’s recommended to stay on the sidelines and wait for right-side signals before making a decision.
#AcrossProtocol#跨链桥#风险预警
Across Protocol ($ACX ) is facing a predicament of multiple negative factors stacking up, with significant downward pressure on prices in the short term. Specifically:
1. Being placed on Binance’s monitoring tag, it faces the risk of delisting in August 2026, dealing a blow to both liquidity and market confidence;
2. Suffered a $4.5 million exploit attack on July 17, raising doubts about the protocol’s security and reducing funding confidence;
3. Smart money accounts are at severe unrealized losses, and the potential exit by large holders may further intensify sell pressure.
At present, ACX is quoted at $0.04058, with only $1.31 million in 24-hour trading volume and a market cap of $29.06 million; liquidity has clearly contracted. With multiple negative factors resonating together, investors should remain alert to the risk of further downside in the short term and not blindly buy the dip.
#AcrossProtocol #ACX
1. Being placed on Binance’s monitoring tag, it faces the risk of delisting in August 2026, dealing a blow to both liquidity and market confidence;
2. Suffered a $4.5 million exploit attack on July 17, raising doubts about the protocol’s security and reducing funding confidence;
3. Smart money accounts are at severe unrealized losses, and the potential exit by large holders may further intensify sell pressure.
At present, ACX is quoted at $0.04058, with only $1.31 million in 24-hour trading volume and a market cap of $29.06 million; liquidity has clearly contracted. With multiple negative factors resonating together, investors should remain alert to the risk of further downside in the short term and not blindly buy the dip.
#AcrossProtocol #ACX
Across Protocol ($ACX ) has recently faced multiple negative catalysts, making its situation increasingly difficult. On one hand, Binance has placed it on its watchlist, and it is expected to face a delisting risk in August 2026, with liquidity and market confidence continuing to be under pressure. On the other hand, the $4.5 million vulnerability attack that occurred on July 17 further exposed the protocol’s weaknesses on the security front, dealing a clear blow to community trust. Even more worrying is that some “smart money” accounts have begun showing large unrealized losses, and there are obvious signs of capital outflows. Based on current data, the quote at $ACX is only $0.04058, with a 24-hour trading volume of $1.31 million and a market cap of about $29.06 million. Liquidity is low, so any small rumor or development is easily magnified. Against the backdrop of multiple negative factors converging, the risk of short-term price downside cannot be ignored.
Of course, the cross-chain bridge sector still has long-term narrative value. The key is whether the team can make substantive fixes to the security vulnerabilities, and how it will respond to ecosystem contraction brought on by exchange delistings. For holders, perhaps what matters more right now is risk management rather than blindly trying to buy the dip.
One-sentence summary: Negative news is piling up—stay cautious. #AcrossProtocol#cross-chain bridge#crypto market
Of course, the cross-chain bridge sector still has long-term narrative value. The key is whether the team can make substantive fixes to the security vulnerabilities, and how it will respond to ecosystem contraction brought on by exchange delistings. For holders, perhaps what matters more right now is risk management rather than blindly trying to buy the dip.
One-sentence summary: Negative news is piling up—stay cautious. #AcrossProtocol#cross-chain bridge#crypto market
🦈 $ACROSS ATTACKER JUST RETURNED 331.8 ETH – MORE TO FOLLOW? 🚨
📌 A partial repayment of $62.4k to the Across Protocol Hub Pool multi‑sig after a $3.6M Solana heist. This isn’t a full recovery – it’s a signal. 📉
🔍 The chessboard is shifting. Hackers usually don’t return funds unless they’re squeezing pressure or negotiating a deal. Returned ETH to the protocol’s treasury could mean the team is gaining leverage – or that the attacker is trying to soften the blow before a bigger move. 💡
📊 For $ACROSS , this reduces immediate panic bleed. But price action will depend on whether more funds trickle back or if the court of public opinion turns cold. Are you reading this as a capitulation move by the hacker or a calculated smart‑money signal? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #AcrossProtocol #ACROSS #CryptoNews #HackRecovery #ETH
🔍 💎
📌 A partial repayment of $62.4k to the Across Protocol Hub Pool multi‑sig after a $3.6M Solana heist. This isn’t a full recovery – it’s a signal. 📉
🔍 The chessboard is shifting. Hackers usually don’t return funds unless they’re squeezing pressure or negotiating a deal. Returned ETH to the protocol’s treasury could mean the team is gaining leverage – or that the attacker is trying to soften the blow before a bigger move. 💡
📊 For $ACROSS , this reduces immediate panic bleed. But price action will depend on whether more funds trickle back or if the court of public opinion turns cold. Are you reading this as a capitulation move by the hacker or a calculated smart‑money signal? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #AcrossProtocol #ACROSS #CryptoNews #HackRecovery #ETH
🔍 💎
🔥 BREAKING NEWS 🔥
The perpetrator behind the $3.6 million security incident targeting Across Protocol on Solana has returned 331.8 $ETH , valued at approximately $624,000, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield.
#CryptoNews #AcrossProtocol #Ethereum
$TON $SUI
Source: Compiled
The perpetrator behind the $3.6 million security incident targeting Across Protocol on Solana has returned 331.8 $ETH , valued at approximately $624,000, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield.
#CryptoNews #AcrossProtocol #Ethereum
$TON $SUI
Source: Compiled
🔥 BREAKING NEWS 🔥
The perpetrator behind the $3.6 million security incident targeting Across Protocol on Solana has returned 331.8 $ETH , valued at approximately $624,000, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield.
#CryptoNews #AcrossProtocol #Ethereum
$TON $SUI
Source: Compiled
The perpetrator behind the $3.6 million security incident targeting Across Protocol on Solana has returned 331.8 $ETH , valued at approximately $624,000, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield.
#CryptoNews #AcrossProtocol #Ethereum
$TON $SUI
Source: Compiled
Across Protocol attackers have returned 331.8 ETH (about $623,900) to a multisig address controlled by the Across Protocol Hub Pool owner.
On the surface, this looks like stop-loss progress; what’s really worth discussing is the return recipient:
The funds are flowing back to a multisig address, not directly to the user side. That means the real risk lies in how the funds will be allocated afterward, how the accounting will be done, and who will confirm the loss amount.
The attacker’s willingness to return about $623,900 usually suggests the incident is more like a negotiable security matter rather than a completely out-of-control token theft and exit. However, the news does not specify the vulnerability type, the total loss, or whether the full amount was returned, so the market can’t simply treat this as risk fully resolved.
More subtly, PeckShield disclosed the details before the project itself. This may force Across to complete the missing details with a more transparent incident report. If the project only emphasizes that the funds were returned while avoiding the attack path, that’s the red flag traders should watch for.
For ACX traders, the short-term issue isn’t really those 331.8 ETH—it’s instead: whether there are additional returns afterward, whether the relevant cross-chain routes are paused, and whether liquidity providers have started to withdraw.
Do you think that after a cross-chain protocol is hacked, returned funds can restore trust?
#AcrossProtocol #ACX #跨链安全 #PeckShield #Attack
On the surface, this looks like stop-loss progress; what’s really worth discussing is the return recipient:
The funds are flowing back to a multisig address, not directly to the user side. That means the real risk lies in how the funds will be allocated afterward, how the accounting will be done, and who will confirm the loss amount.
The attacker’s willingness to return about $623,900 usually suggests the incident is more like a negotiable security matter rather than a completely out-of-control token theft and exit. However, the news does not specify the vulnerability type, the total loss, or whether the full amount was returned, so the market can’t simply treat this as risk fully resolved.
More subtly, PeckShield disclosed the details before the project itself. This may force Across to complete the missing details with a more transparent incident report. If the project only emphasizes that the funds were returned while avoiding the attack path, that’s the red flag traders should watch for.
For ACX traders, the short-term issue isn’t really those 331.8 ETH—it’s instead: whether there are additional returns afterward, whether the relevant cross-chain routes are paused, and whether liquidity providers have started to withdraw.
Do you think that after a cross-chain protocol is hacked, returned funds can restore trust?
#AcrossProtocol #ACX #跨链安全 #PeckShield #Attack
🚨 Across protocol confirms an attack on the Solana bridge.. Users’ funds are safe!
Across protocol confirmed that its Solana bridge was targeted by a security attack, which led to deposits being temporarily suspended. The protocol reassured users that their funds were not affected and are completely safe, while investigations into the incident continue.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Impact: 📈 High
🏷️ DEFI
#AcrossProtocol #Solana #BridgeAttack #DeFiSecurity #CryptoNews
🔗 Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/across-protocol-solana-bridge-attack/
Across protocol confirmed that its Solana bridge was targeted by a security attack, which led to deposits being temporarily suspended. The protocol reassured users that their funds were not affected and are completely safe, while investigations into the incident continue.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Impact: 📈 High
🏷️ DEFI
#AcrossProtocol #Solana #BridgeAttack #DeFiSecurity #CryptoNews
🔗 Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/across-protocol-solana-bridge-attack/
Across Protocol has released a post-incident report after attackers forged 1,627 Solana deposit events, representing $41.7 million in attempted deposits.
According to the protocol, mitigation efforts limited the Risk Labs-operated relayer's losses to less than $4 million.
#AcrossProtocol #Solana #SOL #Crypto #Blockchain #Security #DeFi
According to the protocol, mitigation efforts limited the Risk Labs-operated relayer's losses to less than $4 million.
#AcrossProtocol #Solana #SOL #Crypto #Blockchain #Security #DeFi
Be aware that on August 17, 6 tokens #AcrossProtocol will be removed from the spot market. This is one of them.
It promised a lot at the time, but it didn't work
It promised a lot at the time, but it didn't work
🚨 $SOL ACROSS PROTOCOL TURNS ATTACK INTO TRUST – NET LOSS UNDER $4M! 💥
🔍 The July 17th Relayer exploit on Solana was a calculated hit – $41.7M in false deposits, nearly 600 transactions advanced. But here’s where the story flips: the attacker’s own funds got trapped, net damage stayed below $4M, and every user was made whole same-day. 🛡️ That’s not luck – that’s a protocol that understands true transparency means owning the error before anyone else even notices the crack.
💡 Smart money watches how projects handle pressure. Across didn’t hide, didn’t blame – they documented, repaid, and patched the off-chain flaw with CCTP. No smart contracts were touched. The real takeaway? Velvet-glove security culture builds long-term bid depth faster than any marketing campaign. 🤔 Do you trust a protocol more after a clean breach response – or does it plant a seed of doubt? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #SOL #Security #Transparency #CryptoNews #AcrossProtocol
💎 🛡️
🔍 The July 17th Relayer exploit on Solana was a calculated hit – $41.7M in false deposits, nearly 600 transactions advanced. But here’s where the story flips: the attacker’s own funds got trapped, net damage stayed below $4M, and every user was made whole same-day. 🛡️ That’s not luck – that’s a protocol that understands true transparency means owning the error before anyone else even notices the crack.
💡 Smart money watches how projects handle pressure. Across didn’t hide, didn’t blame – they documented, repaid, and patched the off-chain flaw with CCTP. No smart contracts were touched. The real takeaway? Velvet-glove security culture builds long-term bid depth faster than any marketing campaign. 🤔 Do you trust a protocol more after a clean breach response – or does it plant a seed of doubt? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #SOL #Security #Transparency #CryptoNews #AcrossProtocol
💎 🛡️
Verified
📢 Fresh hot news: the monitoring cards have just been named—ACX, LSK, and STX, folks! #MonitoringTags 🏷️
History shows that whenever Binance slaps this "red card" on a coin, the price action basically turns into a roller coaster—plus extremely high delisting risk unless you change your behavior. The exchange is cracking down hard: from security to volume, even down to the dev team’s level of laziness! 🔍
What should "survival" traders do right now?
🛑 Are you holding bags? Check the project to see if the dev team is still working—or if they’re off traveling again.
📉 Want to catch the bottom? Calm down—risk is very high. Don’t get tempted just because it looks cheap!
🧘 Sit tight and observe: Wait to see if the project can get through this "ordeal" so the card can be removed, then decide what to do next.
⚠️ This is not financial advice! Want to get updates and trade at super speed? Download Binance and enter the referral code VINHTOCDO to borrow some luck and dodge the storm—stay safe while you scalp! 🚀
#AcrossProtocol #lisk #Stacks #VINHTOCDO
$STX
$LSK
$ACX
History shows that whenever Binance slaps this "red card" on a coin, the price action basically turns into a roller coaster—plus extremely high delisting risk unless you change your behavior. The exchange is cracking down hard: from security to volume, even down to the dev team’s level of laziness! 🔍
What should "survival" traders do right now?
🛑 Are you holding bags? Check the project to see if the dev team is still working—or if they’re off traveling again.
📉 Want to catch the bottom? Calm down—risk is very high. Don’t get tempted just because it looks cheap!
🧘 Sit tight and observe: Wait to see if the project can get through this "ordeal" so the card can be removed, then decide what to do next.
⚠️ This is not financial advice! Want to get updates and trade at super speed? Download Binance and enter the referral code VINHTOCDO to borrow some luck and dodge the storm—stay safe while you scalp! 🚀
#AcrossProtocol #lisk #Stacks #VINHTOCDO
$STX
$LSK
$ACX
$ACX /USDT Analysis 🔥
🟢 Pattern: Bullish Ascending Channel — price is making higher lows, showing buyers remain in control.
Entry: $0.0420–0.0423 | SL: $0.0407 (4H close)
🎯 TP1: $0.0429 | TP2: $0.0442 | TP3: $0.0460
A sustained break above $0.0425 could extend the rally, while losing $0.0418 would weaken the short-term bullish momentum.
$ACX #ACX #AcrossProtocol ocol #ACXUSDT #AcrossProtocol eFi #Binance #Crypto #Bullish
🟢 Pattern: Bullish Ascending Channel — price is making higher lows, showing buyers remain in control.
Entry: $0.0420–0.0423 | SL: $0.0407 (4H close)
🎯 TP1: $0.0429 | TP2: $0.0442 | TP3: $0.0460
A sustained break above $0.0425 could extend the rally, while losing $0.0418 would weaken the short-term bullish momentum.
$ACX #ACX #AcrossProtocol ocol #ACXUSDT #AcrossProtocol eFi #Binance #Crypto #Bullish
$ACX is showing steady strength on the lower timeframes, trading near the upper end of its 24-hour range after bouncing from the 0.03920 low. The price is holding above key intraday support around 0.04100, while volume remains healthy. A successful break above the recent high could attract additional momentum and push the trend higher in the short term.
Target 1: $0.04250
Target 2: $0.04350
Target 3: $0.04500
#ACX #AcrossProtocol #ARB
Target 1: $0.04250
Target 2: $0.04350
Target 3: $0.04500
#ACX #AcrossProtocol #ARB
Log in to explore more content