At 15:58 on November 4 (UTC+8), CZ reposted a lengthy data analysis with just one sentence: “Another attack on Binance.” At 16:49, He Yi also reposted a statement: When a storm hits, some people always think that felling the biggest tree will let them win. But fanning the flames will only make everyone lose confidence in the entire industry—and Binance won’t be the only one hurt.
The lengthy analysis was compiled by X user Ape and examined the 78 hours from 05:00 on October 30 to 20:00 on November 2 (UTC+8). In the sample, 1,083 accounts posted 11,700 hostile pieces of content targeting Binance, generating around 20.93 million impressions. A total of 3,354 posts were individually identified as false information, and nearly 80% were replies to other people’s posts.
The timing is even more interesting. When Binance said it would cover the losses itself, the narrative shifted to “insiders.” When it announced progress in its investigation, the claim became “insolvent.” When withdrawals resumed, people said “outflows were exaggerated.” The analysis also found that 964 accounts rarely discussed Binance under normal circumstances, but their posting volume surged to 24.6 times the usual level during those few days.
The author was also fair: ordinary concerns and reasonable questions were not included, and not all criticism should be dismissed as paid shilling.
For ordinary users, when something major happens, don’t let the emotions in the comments section sway you. For updates on withdrawals and proof of reserves, rely on Binance’s official announcements—they’re far more trustworthy than rumors circulating online.
#币安 #BNB #安全 This does not constitute investment advice
The lengthy analysis was compiled by X user Ape and examined the 78 hours from 05:00 on October 30 to 20:00 on November 2 (UTC+8). In the sample, 1,083 accounts posted 11,700 hostile pieces of content targeting Binance, generating around 20.93 million impressions. A total of 3,354 posts were individually identified as false information, and nearly 80% were replies to other people’s posts.
The timing is even more interesting. When Binance said it would cover the losses itself, the narrative shifted to “insiders.” When it announced progress in its investigation, the claim became “insolvent.” When withdrawals resumed, people said “outflows were exaggerated.” The analysis also found that 964 accounts rarely discussed Binance under normal circumstances, but their posting volume surged to 24.6 times the usual level during those few days.
The author was also fair: ordinary concerns and reasonable questions were not included, and not all criticism should be dismissed as paid shilling.
For ordinary users, when something major happens, don’t let the emotions in the comments section sway you. For updates on withdrawals and proof of reserves, rely on Binance’s official announcements—they’re far more trustworthy than rumors circulating online.
#币安 #BNB #安全 This does not constitute investment advice
