134

134% single-day gain, but the funding rate is negative?

BULLA’s trading volume surged to 174 million USDT today, with the price jumping from 0.025 to 0.073, and the hourly chart has been closing positive continuously. Strangely, the funding rate is -0.067%, which suggests that most people are not optimistic about this rally.

The long-short ratio is 42% long vs 58% short, and the market is rising amid heavy selling. This divergence usually means one of two things: either short sellers are forced to cover, triggering further gains, or the major players are pushing the price up to distribute.

I’d lean toward waiting for now, and see whether the funding rate turns positive or the price holds above 0.07 before making a move.

$BULLA #资金费率背离 #134%
Click the card below to quickly view the market👇

24h -0.58%, the chart looks like nothing happened; put 7d -15.88% and the volume sliding from 231M since the beginning of the month down to 38.9M together, and the contradiction of $PONS shows up: the price is still holding above 0.53, but the volume has already started to pull away. A 30d +73.67% move proves it’s not that nobody wants it—rather, it has just been repriced by capital after a round of re-evaluation. Down from the ATH by -44.74% also reminds you that the emotional peak of this cycle has already passed.

Right now there are two ways to read it. One is healthy turnover: early holders unload, while mid-term capital steps in around 0.50–0.53 and waits for a new narrative. The confirmation signals are very specific: a pullback that doesn’t break 0.50, volume strength returning to 70M+; and on the rebound, the price should at least manage to reclaim 0.57.

Two is liquidity ebbing: market makers and smart money exit first, leaving retail to trade among themselves near the moving averages. The confirmation signals are direct too: a rebound on declining volume, 0.57 failing to hold; then if it breaks back below 0.50, the next area likely becomes 0.45.

Market cap: #134, 366M. In this kind of size, alpha can buy it as if it were beta, and it can also be knocked back to square one by a wave of liquidity withdrawal. If you’re holding, don’t rush to comfort yourself with that 24h small red candle—look at the volume first. If you’re watching from the sidelines, don’t wait for a single big green candle to confirm: 0.50 and volume speak earlier than the price itself. Which one do you lean toward?

$BP touched $1.58 and got smashed back to $1.46. People holding positions right now aren’t most torn about whether to run or not—they’re stuck without a reference point. Since listing, there hasn’t been a higher price. The all-time high (ATH) is written as yesterday. Above, there’s no overhead trapped-coin supply, and no support level that’s been verified. Cutting positions is a guess; adding positions is also a guess.

In 30 days, it went from $0.43 to here—+234%, and it doubled in a week. Market cap is $365M, ranking #134. It’s no longer a small pond. Volume can say even more: before 9/7, daily turnover was around $1.7M; from 9/21 it jumped to $25M; on 9/26 it surged to $48M; today it’s $23M. The capital has been advancing in batches—not something lifted by a single needle.

But in the last 24 hours, it moved from $1.25 to $1.58—a 26% range. Disagreement is already on full display. What I care about most is that price and volume aren’t quite lining up: after 9/26, trading volume hasn’t continued to expand, yet the price made a new high. This kind of divergence appearing at a push toward prior highs usually means the number of followers is decreasing.

If $1.58 is taken out on strong volume, then the area above is a vacuum—there could be a period of trading with no resistance. Conversely, if it breaks below $1.25 and the retest lacks strength, this move might just be a quick re-rating.

For holders, the next thing to watch is only one: when it retraces to $1.25–$1.30, whether the trading volume visibly shrinks compared with the surge. If volume contracts, it suggests the coins are still locked up; heavy sell-off volume means someone is distributing.

$BNB ’s 0.4% dip over 24 hours - quiet, almost imperceptible.
Yet it’s the kind of move that makes you pause. Here’s why.

Binance recently announced it will launch USDⓈ-Margined SKHYUSDT and multiple TradFi perpetual contracts - a clear catalyst, but one that’s yet to shake BNB’s broader downtrend.
Over the past week, BNB is down 0.5%, and over 30 days, it’s down 5.0%.
The news landed, and the market shrugged.

That’s the tension. A big event, but no big move.
Could it be that the market already priced this in?
Or is BNB just holding steady while others - like $DEXE - surged 23.2%?
DEXE’s rally, meanwhile, is a stark outlier.
It’s up nearly a quarter, yet it’s not even in the top 5 by trading volume.
$BTC and ETH, both down slightly, dominate the volume charts.
That’s a curious divergence - a small-cap token surging while the giants move sideways.

DEXE’s rise is notable, but it’s not the only story.
The broader market is down 0.4% on CoinGecko, and stablecoin market cap has shrunk by $10 billion since May.
Yet, the search trends show BNB is getting attention - even if it’s not translating into price movement.

Defense or offense - one word?

—
Not financial advice. DYOR.

📌 Hotspot Watch · #134 · #CryptoTrends #CryptoSighted $BNB

9.6% - that’s the jump in $FIL ’s derivative open interest over the past seven days.
Not a big move in isolation, but it’s sitting next to a 2.0% 7-day price gain and a 30-day price drop of ↓9.3%.

The short-term momentum is there, but the leverage backing it is flat.
FIL’s funding rate is ↑0.0100%, right at the balance point - no premium for longs, no discount for shorts.
That’s the divergence: price ticking up, but the crowd isn’t leaning one way or the other.

—
Not financial advice. DYOR.

📌 Funding Pulse · #134 · #FundingRate #CryptoSighted $FIL

Once a cross-chain narrative leader that was heavily expected, it now seems to have become a dull blade.

$ZRO is currently struggling around $0.85, already down an astonishing 88.6% from its ATH. Over the past month, the price has drifted down from $1.11—more critically, the 24h trading volume has shrunk straight from the $120M range to around $20M now. Market cap has also fallen to #134 .

This is a very typical chart of an “idea/narrative retreat.” When liquidity gets drained by new market hot spots, assets with fundamentals that are still decent but lack short-term catalysts tend to fall into the awkward situation of liquidity drying up. Looking at the current market, there’s no clear sign of strong intervention by smart money. The rebound over the last 30 days (e.g., the early-July push back to $1.0) looks more like attempts by existing capital to test the waters and rescue itself—only to be immediately erased by sell pressure afterward, suggesting overhead supply remains heavy.

The main risk right now is the “cheap illusion.” Dropping nearly 90% doesn’t mean this is necessarily a solid bottom. Without a sustained increase in trading volume and confirmation of a right-side trend, blindly bottom-fishing on the left side can easily catch a falling knife. If, going forward, there isn’t strong growth in on-chain data or a new narrative to support it, it will likely keep grinding within this low range, wearing down patience.

What torments traders most in the market is often not a sudden crash, but the long, forgotten period afterward. Do you think $ZRO is now accumulating potential alpha at the bottom, or is it already an old dream that has been sidelined at the edge of the current cycle?👇