Gemini said my new strategy would make +1.15% to +1.35% a day. On real data it made +0.11%: statistically nothing.
I send every backtest to two AIs (Gemini and GPT) for a second opinion. They're useful: they catch mistakes, suggest tests and argue with each other.
But:
• That "+1.35% a day" strategy was Gemini's own design.
• It once called my 2026 test dates "impossible" because its knowledge stopped earlier.
• Both sometimes state numbers with total confidence that aren't in my data.
My rule now: AI suggests, the data decides.
Sold an "AI trading bot"? Ask: who checked the AI?
Do you let AI touch your trading, or not?
Not financial advice.
#AI #TradingBots #algoTrading #BitcoinFiveWeeklyLosses $BTC
I send every backtest to two AIs (Gemini and GPT) for a second opinion. They're useful: they catch mistakes, suggest tests and argue with each other.
But:
• That "+1.35% a day" strategy was Gemini's own design.
• It once called my 2026 test dates "impossible" because its knowledge stopped earlier.
• Both sometimes state numbers with total confidence that aren't in my data.
My rule now: AI suggests, the data decides.
Sold an "AI trading bot"? Ask: who checked the AI?
Do you let AI touch your trading, or not?
Not financial advice.
#AI #TradingBots #algoTrading #BitcoinFiveWeeklyLosses $BTC
