๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—”๐—•๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ฌ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ช๐—›๐—˜๐—ก ๐—ข๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—™๐—œ๐—ก๐—”๐—ก๐—–๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐— ๐—œ๐—ง๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—•๐—˜๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—œ๐—ก๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—ง ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—”๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ.

USDD is a useful example.

USDD can become savings exposure through sUSDD.

That savings exposure can connect to structured markets.

A principal position can potentially become collateral elsewhere.

A lending position can then produce another financial outcome.

Each protocol specializes in one function.

The user combines those functions according to the strategy.

This is fundamentally different from a financial system where every application operates in isolation.

But composability has a cost: more dependencies.

The more protocols a strategy touches, the more contracts, liquidity conditions and assumptions need to be understood.

More composability means more possibilities.

It also means better due diligence.

@USDD - Decentralized USD @Justin Sunๅญ™ๅฎ‡ๆ™จ #TRONEcoStar