Dusk's selective disclosure feels more important to me than its TPS.
A chain can push thousands of transactions per second and still struggle with the part that actually matters for regulated assets: who gets to see what.
What caught my attention is the practical middle ground. A transaction doesn't necessarily need to expose every piece of information publicly. A regulator, auditor, or counterparty can get the relevant proof without turning the entire transaction history into an open book.
That matters more once you move beyond demos.
If a Dusk-based market has 10,000 investors, I don't think the interesting question is whether the network can process 10,000 transactions quickly. The harder question is whether those 10,000 positions can remain private while authorized parties still verify ownership, compliance, and settlement.
That's where selective disclosure starts looking less like a privacy feature and more like operational infrastructure.
I'm still skeptical about how well this works at real market scale. The concept is clear. The harder test is whether institutions actually use it repeatedly, across 100 or 1,000 settlements, instead of praising the architecture once and moving on...

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk