Ăm chã húi

#binancep2pantoan
Money has been deposited into your account, but you shouldn't celebrate yet

@Binance Vietnam

You’re selling USDT on Binance P2P.

The buyer places an order—everything proceeds normally. After a while, your bank account notifies you that the full payment has been received.

You think: “Alright, the trade is done.”

But when you check carefully, you find that the name of the person who transferred the money doesn’t match the name of the person you’re dealing with on P2P.

The buyer immediately messages:

“Please go ahead and release the USDT, this is my relative’s account.”

It sounds quite reasonable.

But this is exactly the moment you shouldn’t rush.

Payments from a third party’s account can create risks of later disputes or chargebacks. Binance also warns users to avoid receiving payments from third-party accounts and to keep transaction evidence.

So if you encounter this situation:

- Double-check the sender’s details and the order information.

- Don’t transfer USDT just because the other party keeps urging you.

- Don’t refund to a different account at the other party’s request without authorization.

- Keep the full chat history and payment proof.

- If anything seems off, use the Appeal (dispute) feature so Binance can assist with handling it. Binance P2P has escrow mechanisms and an Appeal process for disputes that arise.

What’s scary in P2P isn’t always “not receiving the money.”

Sometimes the money is already in your account, but the next thing you need to verify is the source of funds and the payment information.

$EDEN There may be a downward correction wave forming. Prefer setting SHORT if the price continues to weaken and cannot reclaim the current resistance zone.

Entry: $0.050 - $0.049
TP: $0.047 - $0.045 - $0.042 - $0.040
SL: $0.053

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
What is Dusk? Simply explained in one article

If Bitcoin stands out for its transparency, and many other blockchains focus on DeFi and smart contracts, then Dusk is taking a rather different direction: building blockchain infrastructure for finance that requires both privacy and compliance.

The problem Dusk wants to solve is quite easy to understand:

A company brings financial assets onto the blockchain, but it doesn’t want everyone to see all of its balances, positions, counterparties, or trading strategy.

If everything is made public, that’s not okay.

But if everything is hidden, regulators or partners can’t verify anything.

So Dusk is trying to solve the “middle ground” problem: sensitive data can be protected, but the information that matters can still be proven or selectively disclosed. Dusk uses zero-knowledge proofs along with public trading models and shielded transactions to support this approach.

A bit of a joke:

Typical blockchain:
“Here’s my transaction—go ahead and take a look.”

Dusk:
“You can verify that I did the right thing, but you don’t necessarily need to know everything behind the scenes.”

That’s also why Dusk is aiming for use cases like tokenized securities, RWA, financial trading, settlement, KYC/AML, and applications that require access control.

And the DUSK token plays the role of the network’s native token, used for gas and staking.

In short: Dusk doesn’t simply want to build an “anonymous” blockchain. The core idea is to create an environment where privacy, verifiability, and the requirements of the financial market can coexist.

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk

Dusk: Blockchain doesn’t necessarily have to tell everything

Imagine you are a financial institution trading a large asset on a blockchain.

The transaction has just been completed, and instead of only the people involved knowing the information, anyone can go to an explorer to see the wallet, the amount of money, and the transaction history.

Transparent? Yes.

Comfortable for businesses? Not quite.

This is the problem that Dusk Network wants to solve: building a blockchain for financial applications that require privacy, but still need verifiability and regulatory compliance.

Dusk uses technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs to prove that something is true without necessarily disclosing all the underlying data.

In simple terms:

Traditional blockchain:
“Here is my transaction—everyone can come and take a look.”

Dusk:
“You can verify that I did it correctly, but you don’t necessarily need to know all of my business secrets.”

What’s notable is that Dusk isn’t going the direction of “hide everything at any cost.” The goal is to strike a balance between privacy, compliance, and auditability—especially for real-world financial and tokenized asset use cases.

Because if traditional finance truly moves onto the blockchain, maybe businesses won’t want to turn their entire accounting ledgers into… a live TV program.

Transparency is good. Transparency for the right people, with the right information, is even better.