FTT has been sold for profit, 102% return
Next, let’s briefly compare the parameters of arb, which has the greatest potential for Amway.
Technical architecture and processing model
What they have in common: Both use Optimistic Rollups technology to increase the scalability of Ethereum and reduce congestion and transaction costs by aggregating multiple transactions into one batch.
difference:
Dispute resolution process: Optimism uses a single round of fraud proof, executed on Layer-1; Arbitrum uses multi-round fraud proof executed off-chain, which is cheaper and more efficient.
Virtual machine: Optimism uses Ethereum’s EVM, limited to Solidity; Arbitrum uses its own Arbitrum Virtual Machine (AVM), which supports all EVM programming languages.
Ecosystem and community size
TVL: Arbitrum leads the way with TVL of approximately $2.09 billion, compared to Optimism's $807 million.
Social Media and Community: Arbitrum has more followers and members than Optimism on both its official Twitter and Discord channels.
Transaction speed and processing power
Transaction speed: Arbitrum can handle 40,000 transactions per second, while Optimism tops out at 2,000 transactions per second.
safety
What they have in common: Both inherit Ethereum’s strong security, using an “optimistic” security approach that treats transactions as honest during a “challenge period” until proven fraudulent.
Differences: Arbitrum’s “AnyTrust” model ensures that as long as there is an honest verifier, the system can run correctly; Optimism ensures deterministic transaction ordering, enhancing the predictability and security of contract execution.
activity and development
Total Value Locked (TVL): Arbitrum has a TVL of $5.87 billion and a market share of 60%, while Optimism has a TVL of $2.22 billion and a market share of 22%.
Trading volume and user activity: Arbitrum’s trading volume and average daily transactions are significantly higher than Optimism, and it has a larger user base.
future plan
Optimism: Plans to roll out Bedrock update focused on modularity, simplification, and Ethereum equivalence; collaborates with Coinbase on new Base layer 2 blockchain.
Arbitrum: Plans to use the newly introduced local governance token ARB to improve the decentralized decision-making of the platform; launch Arbitrum Nova (a side chain that reduces gas costs), Arbitrum Orbit (allow developers to launch Layer-3 solutions) and Stylus upgrade (extension platform functions).
Next, let’s briefly compare the parameters of arb, which has the greatest potential for Amway.
Technical architecture and processing model
What they have in common: Both use Optimistic Rollups technology to increase the scalability of Ethereum and reduce congestion and transaction costs by aggregating multiple transactions into one batch.
difference:
Dispute resolution process: Optimism uses a single round of fraud proof, executed on Layer-1; Arbitrum uses multi-round fraud proof executed off-chain, which is cheaper and more efficient.
Virtual machine: Optimism uses Ethereum’s EVM, limited to Solidity; Arbitrum uses its own Arbitrum Virtual Machine (AVM), which supports all EVM programming languages.
Ecosystem and community size
TVL: Arbitrum leads the way with TVL of approximately $2.09 billion, compared to Optimism's $807 million.
Social Media and Community: Arbitrum has more followers and members than Optimism on both its official Twitter and Discord channels.
Transaction speed and processing power
Transaction speed: Arbitrum can handle 40,000 transactions per second, while Optimism tops out at 2,000 transactions per second.
safety
What they have in common: Both inherit Ethereum’s strong security, using an “optimistic” security approach that treats transactions as honest during a “challenge period” until proven fraudulent.
Differences: Arbitrum’s “AnyTrust” model ensures that as long as there is an honest verifier, the system can run correctly; Optimism ensures deterministic transaction ordering, enhancing the predictability and security of contract execution.
activity and development
Total Value Locked (TVL): Arbitrum has a TVL of $5.87 billion and a market share of 60%, while Optimism has a TVL of $2.22 billion and a market share of 22%.
Trading volume and user activity: Arbitrum’s trading volume and average daily transactions are significantly higher than Optimism, and it has a larger user base.
future plan
Optimism: Plans to roll out Bedrock update focused on modularity, simplification, and Ethereum equivalence; collaborates with Coinbase on new Base layer 2 blockchain.
Arbitrum: Plans to use the newly introduced local governance token ARB to improve the decentralized decision-making of the platform; launch Arbitrum Nova (a side chain that reduces gas costs), Arbitrum Orbit (allow developers to launch Layer-3 solutions) and Stylus upgrade (extension platform functions).
