69

$PI is currently revisiting the low-volume range after the big up candle on August 6. At the end of July, it was still hovering around $0.077. By mid-August, trading volume shrank to $2.86M—an actual vacuum state where nobody wanted to sell and nobody was in a hurry to buy. Over the past two days, the price has slowly climbed to $0.094, and volume has recovered to $10.44M. But in absolute terms, it’s clear: this buy-side size is only propping up the price—it’s not really driving it.

What’s truly worth mentioning isn’t the +4.15% green candle itself, but the fact that it happened while the asset was still 96.85% away from ATH. A market cap of $1.04B holds up the #69 rank, yet the daily turnover is only one-thousandth. That suggests this is a token maintained by holding structure rather than trading activity. From $0.077 to $0.094, the gain is about 22%—it looks more like a natural float up after selling pressure has dried up. The section above $0.095 to $0.10, where price is likely to face its first real test, is where the chips accumulated during the sideways consolidation in July, stacked together with recent short-term profit-taking.

What I care about most is this: in 30 days it’s +2.26%, but in 1 year it’s -73.85%. This structure implies that any rebound could be interpreted as a chance to reduce positions. Unless daily trading volume keeps staying above $15M and the price does not break below $0.089, then this uptick can only be attributed temporarily to liquidity replenishment—not to a narrative restart.

The market has regained some warmth, but $PI’s long-term bearish structure hasn’t changed just because of three days of green candles. The most contradictory part right now is that the people who are entering are betting the bottom consensus has already formed, while those who are trapped are waiting for the rebound to clear their bags. The target prices of these two groups happen to fall into the same range.

🏆 FLIPPENING

💰 Ethereum just flipped Raytheon Technologies!
$ETH $286.20B · now #69 of all assets
Passed Raytheon Technologies ($286.12B)

🍳 Crypto vs the whole world. Not financial advice.

#CookingBNB #Crypto #Bitcoin #BTC

$PI’s most uncomfortable part for current holders isn’t that it’s pumping hard—over 24h it’s only +4.25%—but that two straight days of heavy volume have trapped you in a “chase and fear it’s too late / don’t chase and fear it’ll fly” position.

Take a look at the tape: the price climbed from $0.085288 on 8/17 back to $0.090224. Market cap ranks #69, but daily trading value is only $8.94M and the turnover rate is still below even 0.1%. What’s especially eye-catching is the $0.092 area—within the past 30 days, it’s been tapped from above three times (8/6, 8/9, 8/20) and each time it got pushed back down. That’s the clearest supply zone right now. Below it, real support does exist: the $0.083–0.086 range has repeatedly kept the price afloat.

What I care about more is whether $0.092 can break out on volume. What $PI lacks now isn’t support—it’s the type of buying that can push volume to the $20M level during a breakout. Before the breakout, entries mean you have to endure the grind of repeated pullbacks. Wait for confirmation and you’ll have to accept higher costs and a smaller stop-loss window—this is the price of chasing versus not chasing.

Risk also needs to be spelled out clearly: 1y is -74.29%, and the long-term structure is still downward. This is only an attempt at a medium-sized rebound. If $0.092 is pushed back for the third time, and volume contracts back below $4M, the $0.085 support will become unreliable, and it’s not impossible that $0.077 is revisited to form a new base.

So here’s a concrete multiple-choice question: if $PI next manages to stand above $0.092 on volume, will you jump in immediately, using $0.088 as the stop-loss line, or wait for it to hold steady and then buy the pullback? Choosing the first option means bearing the loss from a fake breakout; choosing the second means accepting the risk that it won’t look back and could run straight toward $0.10, leaving you chasing. What’s your answer?

$PI told a “very quiet” story with a +0.11% move over 24 hours, but that’s likely an illusion caused by the scale being too close. Flatten the timeline to 30 days: the trend drifts from 0.092 down to 0.086, with a low at 0.077 and a high at 0.0919—essentially a slowly sloping box. Zoom out and it’s clearer: 30 days -11.06%, one year -75.68%, and still a 97% abyss away from the ATH.

More telling than the price is volume. In mid-July, there were still single-day trades of $23M; now it’s only $3.18M. For a token with a market cap of $956M and ranking #69 , this turnover rate is so low it’s nearly frozen. $PI hasn’t dropped “very badly” from this level not because someone is propping it up, but because neither bulls nor bears are interested in stepping in. Price not moving doesn’t mean it’s safe—it just means nobody needs to take a stance at this price.

What I’m most wary of is the sparsity of volume in this kind of state: those who want to exit can’t, and those who want to enter don’t want to take the deal. Once large lots loosen, the price might not get any buffering. Conversely, if liquidity returns, it could become the most elastic asset again. The key is whether you have the patience to wait for that signal.

So let me ask one thing: are you currently viewing this from a short-term or swing-trading perspective? If you’re looking at the hourly level, the 0.083–0.092 range is basically everything. If you’re looking at the weekly level, what you’re waiting for isn’t the price—it’s the day when volume expands again to $10M+ . The answers to these two questions point to completely different actions.

A 31.3% surge in $PUMP ’s 30-day open interest contrasts with an 8.6% short-term drop in its 7-day leverage exposure - the crowd’s long-term bets are still inflating, but the near-term bleed raises questions.

—
Not financial advice. DYOR.

📌 Market Narrative · #69 · #CryptoMarket #CryptoSighted $PUMP

—
Not financial advice. Crypto assets are high-risk; do your own research.

Alien Worlds ($TLM ) is up 57.7% in 24 hours — a move that’s hard to ignore. But $BTC , the usual anchor, is only up 1.5% over the same period. $ETH is quietly ticking up too, with a 7-day gain of 10.9%. It’s not the kind of move that grabs headlines, but it’s steady.

So what’s different this time? Why is TLM outpacing the majors?

The question is — is this the start of a new theme, or just a flash in the pan?

The data is here. The move is real. What’s next?

Not financial advice. Crypto assets are high-risk; do your own research.

📌 Hotspot Watch · #69

#CryptoTrends #CryptoSighted $TLM

$WLFI ’s price is down 7.5% in 24 hours, yet its name is climbing up the search volume list - a curious split.
What’s moving here, and who’s paying for it?

At $0.0527, WLFI has fallen from its 24-hour high of $0.0573, trading 125.7 million tokens.
That’s a sharp drop, but not enough to break the broader market’s attention.
In fact, it’s now among the top 10 most searched projects on CoinGecko, even as its price sinks.
That kind of divergence - attention rising, price falling - is worth a closer look.

The derivatives market tells a different story.
WLFI’s open interest stands at 1.93 billion tokens, or about $102 million.
That’s a big number, but the funding rate is flat at ↑0.0050%, indicating a balance between longs and shorts.
No one is paying more to hold a position - the market is in equilibrium.
That’s a key detail: the price drop isn’t being driven by leverage.
If anything, it’s a move without conviction.

—
Not financial advice. DYOR.

📌 Gainers Radar · #69 · #Gainers #CryptoSighted $WLFI

We're excited to share the latest trending tokens on CoinGecko 🚀. Our community is always looking for new and exciting projects to explore.

We've got a list of tokens that are making waves, including ADI, Ondo, Akedo, Pudgy Penguins, Pi Network, The Black Bull, and Cash Cat, with market cap ranks ranging from #42 to #582. Notable tokens like Ondo and Pi Network are ranked #42 and #69 respectively.

We're seeing a lot of interest in these tokens, and we're curious to see how they'll perform in the future 💡. As we continue to monitor the market, we're looking forward to seeing which tokens will rise to the top 📈.

$BANK , $UTK, $AKE

$PI’s order book is undergoing a subtle shift—after the price broke below $0.08, trading volume instead expanded. On July 14 it surged to $31M, and over the past couple of days it has stayed around $20M. This doesn’t look like a typical bullish “escape” signal; it feels more like someone is probing a tentative buyback—or in other words, capital is betting that this level has already been driven down hard enough.

But looking at the longer chart, in the last 30 days it’s down 36%, still -97% from ATH. Holders know full well that getting back to breakeven would require a 30x rally. This is no longer a problem that a simple “buy the dip” can solve. It ranks #69 by market cap, with a trading volume-to-market-cap ratio of about 2.2%. That’s not especially high for a meme or a new narrative, but for a highly controversial “phone mining” project, this liquidity level suggests that short-term battle money really has been moving in.

What I care about more is: where is this rebound buying coming from? Is it from short covering after the drop from $0.13, or is a new ecosystem—or listing—expectation quietly brewing? Based on on-chain data, over the past few days the trading volume has mainly concentrated in the $0.076–$0.084 range, and the price hasn’t quickly pulled away from the cost zone. That suggests selling pressure is still present, and buyer willingness isn’t particularly firm.

The risk is that if volume can’t be sustained above $20M and it can’t break through $0.09, this may only be a downtrend continuation— a trap designed to get the sidelines to act and force holders to endure a few more days. The condition for the thesis to hold is whether, in the next 48 hours, the price can hold above $0.085 and continue to expand volume.

Have you noticed any new ecosystem developments or exchange-related updates lately that are influencing $PI’s narrative? Please feel free to add details—I’m missing this part of the puzzle.