#dusk $DUSK @Dusk Earlier I thought that the more public a blockchain is, the more trust it deserves: everyone sees the same data, can verify transactions, and therefore there is less room for opacity.

But Dusk made me look at privacy differently.

I’m drawn to the idea of selective disclosure: information doesn’t have to be open to everyone in order for the system to be verifiable. What matters is who has the right to access the data and under what conditions. Combined with zero-knowledge proofs and confidential transfers, it looks more like access control than total concealment.

This is especially important for regulated assets. Transactions involving securities don’t always need to be fully visible to the market, but regulators must have the ability to verify them when there are legitimate grounds.

So the question is no longer just about choosing between public and private. It’s much more interesting to consider who can see which data and under what circumstances.

That’s the approach that could make onchain infrastructure more suitable for the financial market.

Now it will be interesting to see how Dusk performs in real-world conditions: with many organizations, participants, and different assets.