pumpfun

🚨 What If the Biggest #Memecoin Wallets Aren’t as Profitable as They Look?😶

A #Bitquery study examined $752.5 million in reported gains across major wallets associated with Pump.fun tokens. Only 26% passed its checks for conventional market trading. Around 51% involved wallets selling tokens received from other addresses, while 13% showed potentially coordinated trading patterns.


🔍 This doesn’t prove the profits were fake or that every transfer involved manipulation. But it raises a serious question about copy trading: are you following genuine trading skill, or wallet activity that you can’t realistically replicate?

📊 Before copying a wallet, examine its actual buy and sell history, token liquidity, entry prices, and whether its profits came from executable trades. A profitable-looking wallet doesn’t guarantee profitable followers.

👀 Would you trust a wallet showing millions in gains without verified trading history?

$PUMP #CoinVahini #PumpFun #CryptoTrading

PUMP/USDT: Can Pump.fun Turn Strong Revenue Into Its Next Bullish Move? 🚀

$PUMP is worth watching as traders look beyond meme coin hype and focus on real platform activity. The key bullish argument for PUMP is whether the launchpad can keep generating revenue, supporting token buybacks, and attracting users across the Solana ecosystem.

On October 25, reports highlighted Pump.fun’s significant contribution to crypto token buybacks, with nearly $200 million attributed to the platform alongside broader industry activity. That keeps attention on its revenue-driven token strategy, although buybacks alone can not guarantee price appreciation.

What matters for $PUMP now?


The bullish case depends on three things: sustained platform revenue, continued demand for PUMP, and a technical breakout backed by strong trading volume.

If buyers reclaim nearby resistance and hold it as support, momentum could build toward higher levels. But if the price loses recent support, another correction remains possible.

My take: $PUMP has an interesting growth story, but the next move needs confirmation from the chart and market activity. I’m watching for a breakout rather than chasing a sudden green candle.

Do you think PUMP can lead the next meme coin rally, or does it need a deeper pullback first?

#PUMP #PumpFun #USDT #Solana #CryptoMarket

🚨 Pump.fun Is Expanding Beyond Solana!

Pump.fun has added Monad token trading to its app, allowing users to buy Monad-based tokens directly with their existing USDC balance—without manually bridging funds or switching wallets.

Why it matters: Easier cross-chain trading could attract more users and expand Pump.fun’s ecosystem.

Important: More platform activity doesn’t guarantee higher $PUMP demand or price gains.

Click the $PUMP widget below and check the latest developments.

$PUMP
.
.
.

#pumpfun #Crypto #write2earn
Not financial advice. DYOR.

🚀 PUMP - Pump.fun's Own Token Pumping Utility

PUMP at $0.00423 today, 24h vol $145M. Down 7.2% weekly but +7.6% monthly. Market cap $1.96B, rank #50.

Analysis: HUGE update - Pump Bridge now default, 2x faster buys, 92% fewer errors. Active addresses 89K (monthly high), holders 462K and growing. Platform doing $45.4M monthly fees = real revenue buyback story.

Prediction: Resistance $0.00484 then $0.00511. If holds above $0.00419, bulls eye $0.0055. Bear case $0.00348.

Your move? Does Pump Bridge make PUMP next SOL runner to $0.008 ATH? What price you entering? 👇
#PUMP #Pumpfun #Solana #BinanceSquareTalks #CZBİNANCE
$PUMP $SOL $BNB

🚨 Suspicions of Fake Profits on Pump.fun! Of the $752.5 Million in Reported Profits, Did Real Trades Account for Only 26%?

Group: 点击加入短线策略群

💰 Copy-trading meme coins: When you see others making millions of dollars, do you feel tempted to jump in too?

Hold on! A new study by Bitquery found that of the $752.5 million in profits reported on Pump.fun, only $193.9 million came from actual buy and sell trades—just 26%!

⚠️ Even more shocking, around 51% of the profits came from selling tokens transferred in from other wallets, while another 13% or so involved suspected circular trades between related wallets.

This means some wallets may appear to be raking in huge profits, even though they may have no corresponding record of actual purchases. The study also found that 15 of the 25 most profitable trades showed signs of suspected wash trading.

📉 Why is this especially risky for copy traders?

Because what you see may only show how much someone sold—not whether they ever bought the tokens in the first place or what their cost basis was. If you simply copy their sell, you could end up buying at the top.

On top of that, trading fees, network fees, slippage, and execution delays mean that even if the other trader really did make a profit, your results from copying them could be completely different.

💡 A reminder from Jiujiu: When checking meme coin wallet profits, don’t focus only on the profit figure! Check purchase records, where the tokens came from, the cost basis of the holdings, and whether there were any unusual transfers. Reported profits don’t necessarily equal real profits—and they certainly don’t mean you can replicate those same returns.

🚨 Remember: Someone else’s posted profits can be a reference, but they’re not a trading signal.

Do you think copy-trading meme coins is still worth it? Let’s talk in the comments! 👇

Follow me by tapping my profile picture for daily market analysis and short-term strategies 🚀

#pumpfun #meme币

Pump.fun added X Layer support to its app: you can now trade network tokens using a single USDC balance, without manually transferring between networks or switching wallets 🔗📱. According to the announcement from both accounts, this is an in-app integration, not a listing of a specific asset. Have you tried multichain trading? ⚙️
$USDC #PumpFun #XLayer

PumpSwap’s weekly trading volume has fallen to its lowest level since December 2025, and the comments are full of “nature is healing.” I took a look, and both sides are just cherry-picking the numbers they like.

That chart from DegenerateNews with 35K views uses DefiLlama’s figures: for the week of October 19–25, volume was around $1.78 billion, compared with a year-to-date peak of nearly $8 billion. Yeah, it looks bad.

But @renderbloom’s chart also uses DefiLlama: over seven weeks, weekly volume fell from $5.25 billion to $2.02 billion, down 62%, while fees barely budged, slipping from $22.2 million to $21.8 million. Volume got cut by 60%, but the money they collect hardly changed. The claim that “nobody’s playing anymore” just doesn’t hold up. My take is that the wash traders left, but the people actually paying fees are still there. Pump is still collecting rent.

The data sources are all over the place, too. DefiLlama puts PumpSwap at $113 million on Saturday, while GeckoTerminal shows $792 million in 24-hour volume for just the top 120 pools on the same day. You’re going to declare it dead based on data that differs sevenfold?

And the other side shouldn’t get too excited either. @18decimals says Pump’s share among Solana’s four major DEXs rose from 11% in 2025 to nearly 50%. But the entire meme market is shrinking. If everyone gets smaller and your share gets bigger, that’s not winning.

The thing that really deserves criticism is what nobody’s talking about: around the same time, a coin called 4AGENT did about $5.9 million in trading volume in a single pool over roughly 55 minutes, with 2,026 buyers and 37 sellers, and then its liquidity went to zero. New contract address, same name, a fresh one launched about every hour (@TrenchRadar_Sol compiled the data).

Low trading volume isn’t the point. What matters is whether you’re the one collecting rent in this machine, or the one paying it.

#PumpFun #Solana

The moment I open Pump.fun, I’m thinking, “What if this is the next big winner?”

When I close it, I’m usually thinking, “Those few trades just cost me quite a bit in fees.”

I’ve made a rule for myself: no touching the buy button until I’ve checked the Dev wallet.

Missing a big winner stings for a day. Getting rugged stings for a month 🫠

#PumpFun #交易心態 $SOL

The meme launchpad now offers another way to “skip one cross-chain transfer.”

According to reports from PANews and others, the Pump.fun app now supports X Layer, the Layer 2 network from OKX. Users can trade using the same USDC balance, with the official messaging emphasizing that there’s no need to manually bridge assets or switch wallets. For addresses active in the OKX ecosystem, this could reduce friction; for the new network, it connects traffic directly to an established launchpad.

How to assess it: Before using a new product entry point, check three things—whether it’s on the official domain and covered by an official announcement; whether the network and contract can be verified on a block explorer; and whether the USDC balance is genuinely available in the same account view. Convenience often comes with a window for phishing. Before participating, check permissions and approval limits carefully rather than chasing the hype of “another supported chain.”

#Pumpfun #XLayer #OKX #USDC

Tonight I scanned 30 small-cap Pump.fun coins, and 28 showed red flags.

The wildest part wasn’t the bundling—it was how cleanly the Devs got out: in 21 of the 30, the Dev had already sold every last token.

profit: The Dev sold 2.5 times the amount they bought, with 93 buy-and-sell transactions. At launch, 7 other wallets in the same slot scooped up 75.9%. After graduation, it fell 99.3% from its high.
SMB: The Dev bought 20.9% of the supply at launch, started selling just 6 seconds later, and has now fully exited: 7.56 SOL in, 13.46 SOL out. The top 10 addresses still hold 20.7%.
maxxing: At launch, 4 wallets in the same slot took 39.5%. The Dev put in 0.99 SOL and took out 3.46 SOL, also starting to sell within 6 seconds.

The Devs are all out. Think about who’s still on board.

I’ll post a follow-up here around this time tomorrow. Whether I’m right or wrong, I’ll share the results.

NFA | DYOR

The 24-hour check-in on yesterday’s list: PRIVACY -4.1%, MI -3.0%, MEGA -39.2%. All three had already fallen more than 90% from their highs before I posted. The median market-cap change for the 30 coins flagged red last night was -3.6%, and none fell more than another 50%. The list was more of a warning for latecomers not to jump in than a prediction.

#PumpFun #Solana #鏈上排雷 $SOL

🔥 $PUMP - Pump.fun King!

PUMP price: $0.004227 (-1.66% today) Market Cap $1.95B
The Pump.fun platform launches 1,000+ new tokens daily, and all fees go to PUMP holders.

My Analysis: Platform volume is $12M+ and we're in a meme coin super cycle. The more tokens launch, the more demand for PUMP will grow.

Prediction: If $0.0042 support holds, $0.0055 is the next target. $0.01 is possible in Q4.

Will we see PUMP reach $0.01? Yes or No?
#PUMP #Pumpfun #Solana #BinanceSquareFamily #BinanceSquareTalks
$SOL $BTC

A single bio update can send sentiment around a related token soaring.

As reported by Lookonchain, PANews, and others: After trader kimchi added Pump.fun back to his bio, $Kimchi briefly rose by more than roughly 150%. Previously, two days after endorsing Pump.fun, he removed it from his bio, amid reports of declines in the platform’s revenue and active addresses. This reflects a link between a public social media action and short-term sentiment—not a fundamental earnings report.

How to read it: A KOL’s bio is like an “attention switch.” Flip it, and related tokens with thin liquidity are often the first to react. Onlookers should treat sharp swings as sentiment pulses: watch whether they are sustainable and whether actual usage changes in tandem, rather than treating a bio update as a basis for long-term valuation.

#Pumpfun #Kimchi #情绪 #Social Media

This morning, the Solana shitcoin scene ran the same old familiar play: trader Kimchi put Pump.fun back in their X bio, and a meme coin with the same name promptly surged past a $15 million market cap, up over 47% in 24 hours—before sliding back to around $9.3 million.
Here’s how everyone reacted: those who aped in the moment the bio changed believed “the big boss is back”; those who bought the $15 million peak were banking on “last time it hit $30 million in 10 minutes and $40 million in an hour”; those still holding at $9.3 million are telling themselves “at least it hasn’t gone to zero”; and the spectators on the sidelines quietly dug up the old receipts from four days ago—the same crew did this on October 22, too, when it fell from $40 million all the way to $21 million.
The funniest part is, they didn’t even change the script: update the bio, coin flies, retail arrives late, then it all comes back down. They ran this exact show four days ago, and people are still buying tickets.
So here’s the question: is this season two of the big boss’s return, or are you willing to pay to watch the same episode again? Pick a side in the comments: A, the bio is the signal—just send it; B, buying a ticket to a rerun means you deserve to get buried.
$SOL $BTC $ETH #meme #土狗 #Pumpfun

Pump.fun was exposed for internal chats showing the product was designed to be “addictive,” leaving CT “shocked.”

Shocked about what?

The chats cited in that New York lawsuit basically admit that most users will lose everything, a small number will make big money, and the platform will reliably collect fees. Posts summarizing the case on X also say the judge has allowed the RICO claims to proceed. Fine—let the lawyers argue the legal side.

What I really want to say is: the on-chain data spelled this out ages ago. People keep reposting Solidus Labs’ finding that “98.6% of tokens show signs of manipulation or rug pulls.” Monthly active users topping 900,000 and most people losing money aren’t secrets either. The people aping into shitcoins every day know perfectly well what’s going on—they just think they’re in the 1.4%.

Now they’re shouting BOYCOTTPUMPFUN, tagging @SEC and @FBI in the comments to demand compensation, then turning around and aping into the next launchpad. That’s not waking up; it’s getting hooked on another platform.

Plenty of “boycott” posts conveniently link a Telegram channel or a new platform’s CA. Outrage is traffic, and someone’s cashing in on all that emotion.

Who knows if the lawsuit will win; even a ruling is years away. There’s only one thing that can protect you: don’t treat a launchpad like a money printer. It’s designed to make money for the platform first.

#PumpFun #Meme

Playboi Carti’s X account got hacked and started promoting a pump.fun coin. I could recite this playbook with my eyes closed.

An account with 3.6 million followers had been basically inactive since early 2025. Then suddenly, the profile picture and banner changed, “PF” was added to the bio, and it started shilling the CA for “carti.” Charts compiled on X showed the coin surging 18,500%, hitting a market cap of $714.6K, and then crashing. The whole thing was just exit liquidity for whoever hacked the account.

The craziest part wasn’t the hack—it was the people watching.

Before anyone had even confirmed whether it was real, someone posted, “Did Carti get hacked?” and helpfully dropped the CA underneath. The question mark was their fallback; the CA was the real point of the post.

Another account said Kimchi had been hacked a few days earlier, and everyone was getting tired of it, so why not just launch a meme coin called Hackoon? The hacker takes a cut, then the people riding the hack take another cut. There’s never a shortage of the next story on-chain.

@Dior100x put it plainly: hacked or not, that’s no reason for you to ape into it. I agree. When a celebrity account suddenly posts a CA, assume it’s been hacked—there’s no other explanation. You think you can get out before it hits a $710K market cap; the person on the other side thinks the same thing. The difference is, their tokens cost them nothing.

#Memecoin #Pumpfun

From 08:17 to 08:35 this morning, Pump.fun launched 566 new tokens.

That’s 31 per minute on average over 18 minutes.

By 08:36, only 5 had graduated—less than 1%.

There were 7 tokens with the ticker GTA alone. When a narrative heats up, copycats can outnumber the original 🫠

For tokens riding a hot narrative, check whether the same Dev is launching them one after another before deciding whether to click in.

$SOL #Solana #PumpFun #OnChainRiskCheck

Not investment advice | NFA | DYOR

【Market Flash】Pump.fun’s daily active wallets hit an all-time high of 89,000 on October 22, overtaking Fomo on Solana over the past few days to claim the top spot in daily activity. Users are voting with their feet, and the meme launchpad is heating up again—but is this driven by real demand, or just another round of short-term speculation? Can its top ranking in daily activity sustain the price of $PUMP ? Comment 1 if you’re bullish, 2 if you’re bearish.
$PUMP $SOL $BONK
#Pumpfun #Solana #Meme coin
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please proceed with caution.

If you’ve been yelling at sniping bots this whole time, you can find someone else to yell at.

Bitquery analyzed 8.2 million Pump.fun token launches: after fees, developers and bundled wallets made off with at least $579 million, while sniping bots made just $31.5 million—a difference of 18x. For 21% of the tokens, developer-linked wallets bought in the very block they were created, holding a median of 10% of the supply.

You think you’re racing bots to get the first bite, but the pool was opened by the people who own it. The bots are just freeloaders at the table.

The funny part comes next. These numbers were published by ZeruAI, which promptly plugged its own Activity Markets, saying on-chain activity would determine who gets in early. Then a bunch of accounts started posting “Coffee time with @zerufinance” and parroting “This changed how I think about who the villain is.” One post got 1,192 views, 126 likes, and 139 replies. Replies outnumbering a tenth of the views—is that the kind of engagement real people can generate?

They’re criticizing insider allocations as unfair while using task accounts to juice engagement. I believe the data, but I’m not buying the narrative. A so-called fair launch is still an allocation system. Who sets the rules, and who gets the points first—that’s what we should be watching.

(“Developer-linked” is inferred from wallet patterns, so there may be some false positives, but the scale speaks for itself.)

#Pumpfun #Meme

Of the 30 small-cap Pump.fun tokens I scanned this evening, 6 graduated in the very same slot they were created.

A slot lasts less than a second, and the entire curve was bought up. That’s not fast fingers—it’s a whole bundle of wallets placing orders at once.

PRIVACY: 25 wallets bought up 92.5% of the supply in the same slot as launch. Dev put in 0.19 SOL and took out 27.56 SOL. 24h: -95%.
MI: Also graduated instantly, with 81.9% bundled. Dev started selling just 36 seconds after launch. 3 SOL in, 133 SOL out.
MEGA didn’t graduate, but the top 10 addresses got 62%. Dev started selling just 6 seconds after launch. 24h: -99.7%.

In 29 of the 30 tokens, the Dev sold more than half within an hour. No matter how pretty the chart looks, you’re probably buying their bags.

I’ll post a 24h follow-up at the same time tomorrow, win or lose.

$SOL #Solana #PumpFun #On-chain red flags

Not investment advice | NFA | DYOR

The contracts of a popular launchpad are being increasingly picked apart.

According to reports, ElizaOS founder Shaw said that reverse engineering of Pump.fun-related contracts is about 90% complete, and that the research findings are expected to be published soon. Disclosures of this kind often affect both the “transparency narrative” and discussions about composability and attack surfaces.

How to read this: reverse engineering doesn’t mean a vulnerability will emerge immediately, but it does reduce information asymmetry—momentum traders, arbitrageurs, and auditors will all be watching. Look for whether the public materials are reproducible, whether they identify unpatched risks, and whether Pump.fun responds or issues emergency patches. Rumors can gain the most traction during an information vacuum.

#Pumpfun #ElizaOS #智能合约 #SecurityResearch