Binance Square
#257

257

94 views
3 Discussing
Wisdomans
·
--
We’re seeing Bitcoin (BTC) +2.3%, Ethereum (ETH) +1.8%, Lisk (LSK) +0.5% today 🚀 Our watchlist adds STONK (STONK) -1.2%, Ember (EMBER) +3.4%, Pons (PONS) +0.9% 🌟 We’ve noted Hunter Laptop (LAPTOP) -0.7% and still rank it #257, staying alert 🔍 $LSK, $ARK, $LSK
We’re seeing Bitcoin (BTC) +2.3%, Ethereum (ETH) +1.8%, Lisk (LSK) +0.5% today 🚀

Our watchlist adds STONK (STONK) -1.2%, Ember (EMBER) +3.4%, Pons (PONS) +0.9% 🌟

We’ve noted Hunter Laptop (LAPTOP) -0.7% and still rank it #257, staying alert 🔍

$LSK , $ARK , $LSK
·
--
Watching $DEXE rise from $23 to $47 without daring to chase—now it’s down to $2.2, and my inner thoughts are churning again. Should I chase it? I’m afraid of catching a falling knife. After all, it’s down 93% in 7 days. This kind of drop is either a chain liquidation explosion or a late-stage liquidation after distribution; not chasing it, though, makes me worry it’ll suddenly rebound like before, missing out on the “bottom-picking” alpha. The data itself doesn’t lie: before July 22, the price was still trading sideways around $35 with moderate volume. Then over the next two days, it was smashed straight through. Over 24 hours, volume surged from $54M to $144M, suggesting a large amount of shares changed hands below $6. But the question is—after the turnover, is it accumulation or still continued distribution? From $47 to $2.2, there’s almost no meaningful rebound in between. That implies the people who chased high were essentially buried, and the low-price buyers may have become the new source of liquidity. What I care about most is whether trading volume can continue to shrink afterward. If, over the next few days, volume contracts and price stabilizes around $2, there might be a chance for an oversold rebound. But if it keeps drifting lower on continued volume expansion, it would mean panic sellers haven’t fully cleared out yet—and there may be more downside. $DEXE ’s market cap is still $216M, ranked #257. It’s not a zero-to-zero wipeout, but it’s 95% away from its ATH, and on the narrative side there’s no sign of any new catalysts. There’s no standard answer to this problem—only a choice of costs. Which way do you lean toward: A. Go in lightly at $2.2 to test the waters, set a stop loss at $1.8, and bet on a 10–20% rebound; B. Wait for it to fall back below $1.5, then decide based on volume; C. Completely give up—don’t touch this kind of “wreckage” with a 90% drawdown. Which option is closest to your decision logic?
Watching $DEXE rise from $23 to $47 without daring to chase—now it’s down to $2.2, and my inner thoughts are churning again. Should I chase it? I’m afraid of catching a falling knife. After all, it’s down 93% in 7 days. This kind of drop is either a chain liquidation explosion or a late-stage liquidation after distribution; not chasing it, though, makes me worry it’ll suddenly rebound like before, missing out on the “bottom-picking” alpha.

The data itself doesn’t lie: before July 22, the price was still trading sideways around $35 with moderate volume. Then over the next two days, it was smashed straight through. Over 24 hours, volume surged from $54M to $144M, suggesting a large amount of shares changed hands below $6. But the question is—after the turnover, is it accumulation or still continued distribution? From $47 to $2.2, there’s almost no meaningful rebound in between. That implies the people who chased high were essentially buried, and the low-price buyers may have become the new source of liquidity.

What I care about most is whether trading volume can continue to shrink afterward. If, over the next few days, volume contracts and price stabilizes around $2, there might be a chance for an oversold rebound. But if it keeps drifting lower on continued volume expansion, it would mean panic sellers haven’t fully cleared out yet—and there may be more downside.

$DEXE ’s market cap is still $216M, ranked #257. It’s not a zero-to-zero wipeout, but it’s 95% away from its ATH, and on the narrative side there’s no sign of any new catalysts.

There’s no standard answer to this problem—only a choice of costs. Which way do you lean toward:

A. Go in lightly at $2.2 to test the waters, set a stop loss at $1.8, and bet on a 10–20% rebound;
B. Wait for it to fall back below $1.5, then decide based on volume;
C. Completely give up—don’t touch this kind of “wreckage” with a 90% drawdown.

Which option is closest to your decision logic?
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number