Binance Square
#icp

icp

16.2M views
24,779 Discussing
Top1Futures
·
--
Bearish
Why $ICP is still struggling ❔🔴 Despite the network activity, ICP’s price remained within a descending channel after failing to hold $3.50 two weeks earlier. The decline took the token to a low of $2.50. The MACD also moved deeper into negative territory over two consecutive weeks, reinforcing the bearish momentum. Together, the channel and MACD suggested that sellers retained control despite the improvement in network activity. The divergence showed that higher throughput had yet to coincide with a sustained price recovery. If selling persisted, $2.30 could become the next support test. A move out of the descending channel would offer an early sign that bearish pressure might be easing. #icp
Why $ICP is still struggling ❔🔴
Despite the network activity, ICP’s price remained within a descending channel after failing to hold $3.50 two weeks earlier. The decline took the token to a low of $2.50.

The MACD also moved deeper into negative territory over two consecutive weeks, reinforcing the bearish momentum.

Together, the channel and MACD suggested that sellers retained control despite the improvement in network activity. The divergence showed that higher throughput had yet to coincide with a sustained price recovery.

If selling persisted, $2.30 could become the next support test. A move out of the descending channel would offer an early sign that bearish pressure might be easing.
#icp
ICP vs NEAR: Market Cap Faceoff 📊 #NEAR #ICP 🟣 ICP: $2.75 | MCap: $1.50B 🟢 NEAR: $4.65 | MCap: $6.08B NEAR has a 4x larger market cap, meaning it has heavy capital backing but lower growth potential. ICP’s lower market cap brings higher risk, but offers much bigger upside if demand shifts. Would you like me to analyze their trading volumes or recent price trends to see which token has better short-term momentum?
ICP vs NEAR: Market Cap Faceoff 📊
#NEAR #ICP

🟣 ICP: $2.75 | MCap: $1.50B

🟢 NEAR: $4.65 | MCap: $6.08B

NEAR has a 4x larger market cap, meaning it has heavy capital backing but lower growth potential.

ICP’s lower market cap brings higher risk, but offers much bigger upside if demand shifts.

Would you like me to analyze their trading volumes or recent price trends to see which token has better short-term momentum?
📊 $ICP {spot}(ICPUSDT) Price Update: Recovery Ahead? Internet Computer ($ICP ) is facing mixed sentiment, with some traders worried while others expect a rebound. 📈 Key Levels: Support: $2.34 Resistance: $3.40–$3.60 Breakout Target: $4.81 Holding support could help ICP recover, while a break below $2.34 may bring further downside. 💡 $ICP 's network activity is gaining attention, but price recovery depends on market demand. Always manage risk and DYOR. Can ICP bounce back? 🚀 #ICP #InternetComputer #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare
📊 $ICP
Price Update: Recovery Ahead?
Internet Computer ($ICP ) is facing mixed sentiment, with some traders worried while others expect a rebound.
📈 Key Levels:
Support: $2.34
Resistance: $3.40–$3.60
Breakout Target: $4.81
Holding support could help ICP recover, while a break below $2.34 may bring further downside.
💡 $ICP 's network activity is gaining attention, but price recovery depends on market demand. Always manage risk and DYOR.
Can ICP bounce back? 🚀
#ICP #InternetComputer #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare
·
--
Bullish
$ICP is showing signs of holding support near current levels after a pullback from recent highs. Buyers need to regain momentum to support a potential recovery toward the next resistance levels. Entry: 2.658 TP1: 2.720 TP2: 2.800 TP3: 2.900 SL: 2.570 Buy and Trade $ICP #ICP {future}(ICPUSDT)
$ICP is showing signs of holding support near current levels after a pullback from recent highs. Buyers need to regain momentum to support a potential recovery toward the next resistance levels.

Entry: 2.658
TP1: 2.720
TP2: 2.800
TP3: 2.900
SL: 2.570

Buy and Trade $ICP

#ICP
⚡ $ICP STACKING EMAS AFTER A TEXTBOOK DEFENSE OF THE $2.00 FLOOR! 💥 Entry: 2.42 - 2.55 ⚡ Target: 2.80 / 3.20 / 3.75 🚀 Stop Loss: 2.25 ⚠️ Buyers drew a line in the sand at $2.00, triggering an aggressive reclaim that pushed $ICP clean above the 7, 25, and 99 EMAs. 📊 The trend structure is shifting fast, with short and mid-term moving averages fanning out into bullish alignment. Clearance above the $2.55–$2.60 supply pocket is the key trigger to unleash momentum toward our upper targets. 💡 Smart bids are quietly absorbing liquidity on every minor dip while sellers lose leverage on the order book. 💬 Are you positioning early in the entry zone or waiting for the resistance flip? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #ICP #LongSetup #Crypto #Breakout #Altcoins 🎯 🦈
⚡ $ICP STACKING EMAS AFTER A TEXTBOOK DEFENSE OF THE $2.00 FLOOR! 💥

Entry: 2.42 - 2.55 ⚡
Target: 2.80 / 3.20 / 3.75 🚀
Stop Loss: 2.25 ⚠️

Buyers drew a line in the sand at $2.00, triggering an aggressive reclaim that pushed $ICP clean above the 7, 25, and 99 EMAs. 📊 The trend structure is shifting fast, with short and mid-term moving averages fanning out into bullish alignment.

Clearance above the $2.55–$2.60 supply pocket is the key trigger to unleash momentum toward our upper targets. 💡 Smart bids are quietly absorbing liquidity on every minor dip while sellers lose leverage on the order book. 💬 Are you positioning early in the entry zone or waiting for the resistance flip? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #ICP #LongSetup #Crypto #Breakout #Altcoins

🎯 🦈
$ICP DECISION ZONE! ICP is trading at $2.635, down 0.49% today and 10.98% this week. The short-term trend remains weak, with a 15.41% monthly decline. BULLISH: Break $2.674 → $2.75 → $2.85 BEARISH: Lose $2.572 → $2.50 → $2.40 ICP remains up 21.43% over 90 days, but bulls need to reclaim resistance to regain momentum. BOUNCE OR BREAKDOWN? WATCH THE KEY LEVELS! #ICP {spot}(ICPUSDT) $ZEC {spot}(ZECUSDT) $ENA {spot}(ENAUSDT)
$ICP DECISION ZONE!

ICP is trading at $2.635, down 0.49% today and 10.98% this week. The short-term trend remains weak, with a 15.41% monthly decline.

BULLISH: Break $2.674 → $2.75 → $2.85 BEARISH: Lose $2.572 → $2.50 → $2.40

ICP remains up 21.43% over 90 days, but bulls need to reclaim resistance to regain momentum.

BOUNCE OR BREAKDOWN? WATCH THE KEY LEVELS!

#ICP
$ZEC
$ENA
🚀 $ICP CHASING $20 BULL RUN – CAN $100 BE THE NEXT HORIZON? 🟢 📊 Recent order‑flow on the 4H chart shows a tightening range as smart‑money 🦈 whales load up above $4.5, squeezing sellers into a classic liquidity trap. ⚡ Volume spikes on each retest suggest buyers are flipping the script, and the RSI is creeping out of oversold territory, hinting at a momentum surge. 💡 If the swing holds, the next resistance towers at $20, then $40, with a $100 ceiling that would catapult market cap to $63B. The key is watching the next liquidity sweep – a breakout could ignite a rapid climb. 💬 Which target are you eyeing as the next liquidity swing? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #ICP #BullRun #LongSetup #Crypto 🔥 💎
🚀 $ICP CHASING $20 BULL RUN – CAN $100 BE THE NEXT HORIZON? 🟢

📊 Recent order‑flow on the 4H chart shows a tightening range as smart‑money 🦈 whales load up above $4.5, squeezing sellers into a classic liquidity trap. ⚡ Volume spikes on each retest suggest buyers are flipping the script, and the RSI is creeping out of oversold territory, hinting at a momentum surge.

💡 If the swing holds, the next resistance towers at $20, then $40, with a $100 ceiling that would catapult market cap to $63B. The key is watching the next liquidity sweep – a breakout could ignite a rapid climb. 💬 Which target are you eyeing as the next liquidity swing? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #ICP #BullRun #LongSetup #Crypto

🔥 💎
🚀 $ICP EYES $40 MARK ON NEXT LIQUIDITY SWEEP! 📈 📊 The latest bullish order block on the 4H chart has absorbed sell pressure, creating a clean fair‑value gap that smart‑money is likely to fill. 🦈 Volume spikes on a top‑tier exchange signal a re‑accumulation phase, and the price is poised to retest the $20‑$30 corridor before targeting the $40 threshold. ⚡ A break above that zone would ignite a cascade toward the $100 horizon, where market cap would eclipse $60B, a classic institutional accumulation narrative. 💬 How far do you think the next liquidity sweep can push $ICP before a macro‑driven correction? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #ICP #LongSetup #LiquidityHunt #Crypto 🔥 🚀
🚀 $ICP EYES $40 MARK ON NEXT LIQUIDITY SWEEP! 📈

📊 The latest bullish order block on the 4H chart has absorbed sell pressure, creating a clean fair‑value gap that smart‑money is likely to fill. 🦈 Volume spikes on a top‑tier exchange signal a re‑accumulation phase, and the price is poised to retest the $20‑$30 corridor before targeting the $40 threshold. ⚡ A break above that zone would ignite a cascade toward the $100 horizon, where market cap would eclipse $60B, a classic institutional accumulation narrative.

💬 How far do you think the next liquidity sweep can push $ICP before a macro‑driven correction? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #ICP #LongSetup #LiquidityHunt #Crypto

🔥 🚀
30D trade $ICP 91.9 USDT
$ICP is struggling to find its footing. The price is around $2.614, down 3.08% in 24 hours, and the 1-hour chart still shows a clear downward trend. There was a bounce after the price touched $2.589, but sellers pushed it lower again. I'm not calling a reversal yet; buyers need to show more strength first. Will $2.589 hold as a short-term floor, or could $ICP slip lower? NFA. Manage risk. #ICP #InternetComputer #cryptotrading $JCT {future}(ICPUSDT) {future}(JCTUSDT)
$ICP is struggling to find its footing. The price is around $2.614, down 3.08% in 24 hours, and the 1-hour chart still shows a clear downward trend.

There was a bounce after the price touched $2.589, but sellers pushed it lower again. I'm not calling a reversal yet; buyers need to show more strength first.

Will $2.589 hold as a short-term floor, or could $ICP slip lower?

NFA. Manage risk.

#ICP #InternetComputer #cryptotrading $JCT
$ICP is sitting at 2.6210 today and I am passing on it Volume is 0.7x the average right now That means this drop is happening without real participation behind it I need to see an hourly close and hold above 2.7120 before I care Or a pullback that respects 2.5890 and actually bounces It could keep running without you and a bad entry costs more than a missed move Chasing $ICP here or waiting for 2.5890 #ICP #RiskManagement
$ICP is sitting at 2.6210 today and I am passing on it

Volume is 0.7x the average right now
That means this drop is happening without real participation behind it

I need to see an hourly close and hold above 2.7120 before I care
Or a pullback that respects 2.5890 and actually bounces

It could keep running without you and a bad entry costs more than a missed move

Chasing $ICP here or waiting for 2.5890

#ICP #RiskManagement
Here's what happened when a $NEAR holder paused their planned buy after the latest headlines started pitting it against $ICP. You know that feeling. Two competing chains spark the usual comparison chatter, both prices slide together, and suddenly you're stuck wondering whether to average down or just step aside before it gets worse. Both tokens moved almost in lockstep last week, $NEAR off 2.99 percent while $ICP slipped 2.93 percent. It felt a lot like those old $SOL versus AVAX stretches where the market treated every layer-1 as the same trade no matter the actual tech. Short-term drama rarely splits them apart. The underlying stories have not changed overnight. NEAR still has its sharding approach and ICP its canister model, yet traders keep getting shaken out by the noise. The ones who stay calm through these correlations are usually still around when the next real move actually rewards the stronger chain. Where do you think this $NEAR versus $ICP correlation heads from here? #NEAR #ICP #Layer1
Here's what happened when a $NEAR holder paused their planned buy after the latest headlines started pitting it against $ICP .

You know that feeling. Two competing chains spark the usual comparison chatter, both prices slide together, and suddenly you're stuck wondering whether to average down or just step aside before it gets worse.

Both tokens moved almost in lockstep last week, $NEAR off 2.99 percent while $ICP slipped 2.93 percent. It felt a lot like those old $SOL versus AVAX stretches where the market treated every layer-1 as the same trade no matter the actual tech. Short-term drama rarely splits them apart.

The underlying stories have not changed overnight. NEAR still has its sharding approach and ICP its canister model, yet traders keep getting shaken out by the noise. The ones who stay calm through these correlations are usually still around when the next real move actually rewards the stronger chain.

Where do you think this $NEAR versus $ICP correlation heads from here?
#NEAR #ICP #Layer1
$ICP SHORT SIGNAL 💥 Entry: $2.6575 – $2.6735 (Short) TP1: $2.5620 TP2: $2.4665 Final TP: $2.3711 SL: $2.7529 As long as $2.7529 acts as resistance, this trade is valid. RSI: 46 Funding Rate: +0.002% | 1H chart Must Use Stop Loss While Trading #ICP #HYPE #BSC ⚡ Go short from here $ICP
$ICP SHORT SIGNAL 💥

Entry: $2.6575 – $2.6735 (Short)
TP1: $2.5620
TP2: $2.4665
Final TP: $2.3711
SL: $2.7529

As long as $2.7529 acts as resistance, this trade is valid. RSI: 46
Funding Rate: +0.002% | 1H chart
Must Use Stop Loss While Trading
#ICP #HYPE #BSC

⚡ Go short from here $ICP
Watching this ICP–NEAR feud, my biggest takeaway so far is this: everyone’s arguing about patents, when what they should really be concerned about is those 8 servers. On October 22, Dominic Williams fired off accusations, saying that the threshold signature scheme used by NEAR Intents and Chain Signatures was a design DFINITY had created exclusively for ICP, and that a former employee fired by DFINITY in 2021 had taken it with them. NEAR had used it for more than two years without a license, and was now quietly replacing it on GitHub. He also threatened “civil and criminal legal consequences.” And then? No lawsuit. NEAR hasn’t issued a direct response to this day. On social media, half the people are ICP fans posting “NEAR is finished,” while the other half are saying Old D is picking a fight again. To put it bluntly, we’ve seen this routine all too often in crypto: threatening criminal charges but never actually filing a lawsuit. It looks more like a way to drum up attention for your own chain. The day before, people were sharing an engineer calling their Confidential Intents “snake oil”; the next day, it had escalated straight to accusations of stealing technology. The timing feels a little too deliberate. Kyle Chasse was right to ask whether this is a genuine beef or just marketing. But don’t rush to take ICP’s side either. Williams also casually dropped this: NEAR’s setup apparently runs on just 8 servers. If that’s true, it’s a much bigger deal than who copied whom. If the signatures for your cross-chain assets rely on just 8 machines, how far are you from centralized custody? That’s what NEAR should be explaining—not the patent. Let the lawyers argue over who copied whom. If you’re moving large sums through Intents, first find out exactly how many signing nodes are behind it. #NEAR #ICP
Watching this ICP–NEAR feud, my biggest takeaway so far is this: everyone’s arguing about patents, when what they should really be concerned about is those 8 servers.

On October 22, Dominic Williams fired off accusations, saying that the threshold signature scheme used by NEAR Intents and Chain Signatures was a design DFINITY had created exclusively for ICP, and that a former employee fired by DFINITY in 2021 had taken it with them. NEAR had used it for more than two years without a license, and was now quietly replacing it on GitHub. He also threatened “civil and criminal legal consequences.”

And then? No lawsuit. NEAR hasn’t issued a direct response to this day. On social media, half the people are ICP fans posting “NEAR is finished,” while the other half are saying Old D is picking a fight again.

To put it bluntly, we’ve seen this routine all too often in crypto: threatening criminal charges but never actually filing a lawsuit. It looks more like a way to drum up attention for your own chain. The day before, people were sharing an engineer calling their Confidential Intents “snake oil”; the next day, it had escalated straight to accusations of stealing technology. The timing feels a little too deliberate. Kyle Chasse was right to ask whether this is a genuine beef or just marketing.

But don’t rush to take ICP’s side either. Williams also casually dropped this: NEAR’s setup apparently runs on just 8 servers. If that’s true, it’s a much bigger deal than who copied whom. If the signatures for your cross-chain assets rely on just 8 machines, how far are you from centralized custody? That’s what NEAR should be explaining—not the patent.

Let the lawyers argue over who copied whom. If you’re moving large sums through Intents, first find out exactly how many signing nodes are behind it.

#NEAR #ICP
星轨投研精选:
专利吵归吵,8台服务器才是真问题。
🚀 HOW HIGH CAN $ICP GO IN THE NEXT BULLISH RUN? 👀🔥 If Internet Computer makes another major move, what price target could it reach? 🎯 🔹 $ICP → $5 🔹 $ICP → $10 🔹 $ICP → $15 🔹 $ICP → $20 🔹 $ICP → $25 🤔 IS $25 FOR $ICP POSSIBLE? At $25 per token, $ICP would have an estimated $17.5 BILLION market cap based on a circulating supply of 700 million tokens. 👀💎 📊 Which target do you believe is realistic this cycle? 👇 Drop your $ICP price prediction in the comments! 💬 #ICP #InternetComputer #Crypto #Altcoins #BullRun
🚀 HOW HIGH CAN $ICP GO IN THE NEXT BULLISH RUN? 👀🔥

If Internet Computer makes another major move, what price target could it reach? 🎯

🔹 $ICP → $5
🔹 $ICP → $10
🔹 $ICP → $15
🔹 $ICP → $20
🔹 $ICP → $25

🤔 IS $25 FOR $ICP POSSIBLE?

At $25 per token, $ICP would have an estimated $17.5 BILLION market cap based on a circulating supply of 700 million tokens. 👀💎

📊 Which target do you believe is realistic this cycle?

👇 Drop your $ICP price prediction in the comments! 💬

#ICP #InternetComputer #Crypto #Altcoins #BullRun
Article
ICP Leaves SOL Behind in Transaction Volume! Impressive Data, Yet Its Price Is Weakening—Why?A strikingly contrasting set of figures has recently emerged in the crypto world: Internet Computer (ICP) continues to widen its lead in total cumulative transactions, surpassing 308 billion, compared with only around 133 billion for Solana (#sol ). Before this, ICP had held the second spot in throughput for several consecutive weeks, but this time it overtook the leader outright. Data shows that #icp averaged around 2,323 TPS, higher than $SOL ’s 1,896. It also set a new record for the busiest single day this quarter, processing 256.5 million transactions in one day, with peak TPS reaching 2,969. Internet Computer TPS

ICP Leaves SOL Behind in Transaction Volume! Impressive Data, Yet Its Price Is Weakening—Why?

A strikingly contrasting set of figures has recently emerged in the crypto world: Internet Computer (ICP) continues to widen its lead in total cumulative transactions, surpassing 308 billion, compared with only around 133 billion for Solana (#sol ).
Before this, ICP had held the second spot in throughput for several consecutive weeks, but this time it overtook the leader outright. Data shows that #icp averaged around 2,323 TPS, higher than $SOL
’s 1,896. It also set a new record for the busiest single day this quarter, processing 256.5 million transactions in one day, with peak TPS reaching 2,969.
Internet Computer TPS
2323's TPS even beat $SOL, so why is $ICP 's price still so lifeless? It's down nearly 2% again in the last 24 hours. The data looks impressive, but the market couldn't care less. High activity doesn't mean strong buying pressure—any crypto veteran knows that. For trading, the key level is 2.6: if it breaks below that, the setup is completely invalidated. Best to wait on the sidelines until there's a signal—and maybe take part in Binance Pick predictions to earn rewards. I'll believe it's real demand only if volume picks up, the price reclaims 2.7, and the funding rate turns positive. Otherwise, this on-chain activity is probably just patting itself on the back and means jack all for the secondary market. Do you think $ICP is gearing up for a big move or just hyping itself up? Comment 1 if you're bullish on a rebound, or 2 if you think it's going lower. #Write2Earn #BinanceSquare #ICP Layer1 #TradingTournament
2323's TPS even beat $SOL , so why is $ICP 's price still so lifeless?

It's down nearly 2% again in the last 24 hours. The data looks impressive, but the market couldn't care less. High activity doesn't mean strong buying pressure—any crypto veteran knows that.

For trading, the key level is 2.6: if it breaks below that, the setup is completely invalidated. Best to wait on the sidelines until there's a signal—and maybe take part in Binance Pick predictions to earn rewards.

I'll believe it's real demand only if volume picks up, the price reclaims 2.7, and the funding rate turns positive. Otherwise, this on-chain activity is probably just patting itself on the back and means jack all for the secondary market.

Do you think $ICP is gearing up for a big move or just hyping itself up? Comment 1 if you're bullish on a rebound, or 2 if you think it's going lower.

#Write2Earn #BinanceSquare #ICP Layer1 #TradingTournament
Article
ICP is down just 2%—why are 99% of liquidations hitting longs?ICP prices on both exchanges were down only about 2%. Futures open interest was around 99 million, and long and short accounts were almost evenly split (longs at about 50.5%). Yet over the past 24 hours, liquidations totaled about 80,000 on the long side and just 482 on the short side—longs accounted for roughly 99% of the total, a gap of about 166 to 1. Price comparison: ICP was around 2.597 on Binance (-2.111%) and around 2.597 on OKX (-2.111%). BTC was around 79,651.2 on Binance (-1.446%) and around 79,687.3 on OKX (-1.402%). The price barely crashed, and accounts weren’t extremely skewed long, yet the liquidation data shows almost exclusively long positions getting wiped out—it looks more like leveraged longs hit the edge first. #ICP #爆仓 #合约行情 #OpenInterest

ICP is down just 2%—why are 99% of liquidations hitting longs?

ICP prices on both exchanges were down only about 2%. Futures open interest was around 99 million, and long and short accounts were almost evenly split (longs at about 50.5%). Yet over the past 24 hours, liquidations totaled about 80,000 on the long side and just 482 on the short side—longs accounted for roughly 99% of the total, a gap of about 166 to 1.
Price comparison: ICP was around 2.597 on Binance (-2.111%) and around 2.597 on OKX (-2.111%). BTC was around 79,651.2 on Binance (-1.446%) and around 79,687.3 on OKX (-1.402%).
The price barely crashed, and accounts weren’t extremely skewed long, yet the liquidation data shows almost exclusively long positions getting wiped out—it looks more like leveraged longs hit the edge first.
#ICP #爆仓 #合约行情 #OpenInterest
$ICP LONG SETUP 📈 Entry: $2.6722 – $2.6882 TP1: $2.7297 TP2: $2.7770 TP3: $2.8222 SL: $2.5911 RSI 38 oversold + 1H support level Funding Rate: +0.010% | 1H chart #ICP #IRYS #BIRB 👉 Click here to go long $ICP
$ICP LONG SETUP 📈

Entry: $2.6722 – $2.6882
TP1: $2.7297
TP2: $2.7770
TP3: $2.8222
SL: $2.5911

RSI 38 oversold + 1H support level
Funding Rate: +0.010% | 1H chart
#ICP #IRYS #BIRB

👉 Click here to go long $ICP
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number