Binance Square
#257

257

106 views
4 Discussing
CipherMuse
·
--
** 8,051 — Why a 1% rise could be a sign of the next 5K breakout?Anonymous Cat (ZCATUSDT) is trending right now! Rank: #257 ** A 1% jump… we moved above $78K and it’s still being talked about as if it were a “normal” move. Shocking, but true: in the last 24 hours it’s reigniting the market with **+1.706%** and **.2 B** trading volume. This shuts the eyes of those who say “BTC will soon stop.” In my view, numbers speak: a price of $78,051, a 1.7% gain, and $1.199M USDT volume, which technically forms a “bull flag” pattern. If the previous resistance breaks 8,500, the next target is between 4,900–5,200. These levels reflect the institutional net inflows that built up last week (ETF purchases and on-chain “whale” moves). We’re seeing the same energy in the altcoin space too. **NEAR** rose to $2.484 with +8%, with volume of 47M USDT. **UNI** is up +7.6% to $6.584; **XRP** is up +5.6% to $1.418. This trio is keeping the “alt season” alive. Many traders say “altcoins are crashing,” but to me **NEAR**’s move from $2.30 to $2.48 looks like a “pump-and-hold” opportunity. On the other hand, **LTC** is struggling at $52.88, down -1.7%. We’re debating whether this is a short-term “dump” or a bigger correction. I think LTC’s low volume and negative momentum could mean it may catch a “rebound” after the next **** rally. There’s no data right now, but it’s still trading sideways in the ,800–,900 range. That brings up the question: “When will Ethereum’s next big move happen?” I think that with ’s “Layer-2” solutions and the **DeFi** flow, there could be a 10–15% rise within 2–3 months.

** 8,051 — Why a 1% rise could be a sign of the next 5K breakout?

Anonymous Cat (ZCATUSDT) is trending right now!
Rank: #257
** A 1% jump… we moved above $78K and it’s still being talked about as if it were a “normal” move. Shocking, but true: in the last 24 hours it’s reigniting the market with **+1.706%** and **.2 B** trading volume. This shuts the eyes of those who say “BTC will soon stop.” In my view, numbers speak: a price of $78,051, a 1.7% gain, and $1.199M USDT volume, which technically forms a “bull flag” pattern. If the previous resistance breaks 8,500, the next target is between 4,900–5,200. These levels reflect the institutional net inflows that built up last week (ETF purchases and on-chain “whale” moves). We’re seeing the same energy in the altcoin space too. **NEAR** rose to $2.484 with +8%, with volume of 47M USDT. **UNI** is up +7.6% to $6.584; **XRP** is up +5.6% to $1.418. This trio is keeping the “alt season” alive. Many traders say “altcoins are crashing,” but to me **NEAR**’s move from $2.30 to $2.48 looks like a “pump-and-hold” opportunity. On the other hand, **LTC** is struggling at $52.88, down -1.7%. We’re debating whether this is a short-term “dump” or a bigger correction. I think LTC’s low volume and negative momentum could mean it may catch a “rebound” after the next **** rally. There’s no data right now, but it’s still trading sideways in the ,800–,900 range. That brings up the question: “When will Ethereum’s next big move happen?” I think that with ’s “Layer-2” solutions and the **DeFi** flow, there could be a 10–15% rise within 2–3 months.
We’re seeing Bitcoin (BTC) +2.3%, Ethereum (ETH) +1.8%, Lisk (LSK) +0.5% today 🚀 Our watchlist adds STONK (STONK) -1.2%, Ember (EMBER) +3.4%, Pons (PONS) +0.9% 🌟 We’ve noted Hunter Laptop (LAPTOP) -0.7% and still rank it #257, staying alert 🔍 $LSK, $ARK, $LSK
We’re seeing Bitcoin (BTC) +2.3%, Ethereum (ETH) +1.8%, Lisk (LSK) +0.5% today 🚀

Our watchlist adds STONK (STONK) -1.2%, Ember (EMBER) +3.4%, Pons (PONS) +0.9% 🌟

We’ve noted Hunter Laptop (LAPTOP) -0.7% and still rank it #257, staying alert 🔍

$LSK , $ARK , $LSK
·
--
Watching $DEXE rise from $23 to $47 without daring to chase—now it’s down to $2.2, and my inner thoughts are churning again. Should I chase it? I’m afraid of catching a falling knife. After all, it’s down 93% in 7 days. This kind of drop is either a chain liquidation explosion or a late-stage liquidation after distribution; not chasing it, though, makes me worry it’ll suddenly rebound like before, missing out on the “bottom-picking” alpha. The data itself doesn’t lie: before July 22, the price was still trading sideways around $35 with moderate volume. Then over the next two days, it was smashed straight through. Over 24 hours, volume surged from $54M to $144M, suggesting a large amount of shares changed hands below $6. But the question is—after the turnover, is it accumulation or still continued distribution? From $47 to $2.2, there’s almost no meaningful rebound in between. That implies the people who chased high were essentially buried, and the low-price buyers may have become the new source of liquidity. What I care about most is whether trading volume can continue to shrink afterward. If, over the next few days, volume contracts and price stabilizes around $2, there might be a chance for an oversold rebound. But if it keeps drifting lower on continued volume expansion, it would mean panic sellers haven’t fully cleared out yet—and there may be more downside. $DEXE ’s market cap is still $216M, ranked #257. It’s not a zero-to-zero wipeout, but it’s 95% away from its ATH, and on the narrative side there’s no sign of any new catalysts. There’s no standard answer to this problem—only a choice of costs. Which way do you lean toward: A. Go in lightly at $2.2 to test the waters, set a stop loss at $1.8, and bet on a 10–20% rebound; B. Wait for it to fall back below $1.5, then decide based on volume; C. Completely give up—don’t touch this kind of “wreckage” with a 90% drawdown. Which option is closest to your decision logic?
Watching $DEXE rise from $23 to $47 without daring to chase—now it’s down to $2.2, and my inner thoughts are churning again. Should I chase it? I’m afraid of catching a falling knife. After all, it’s down 93% in 7 days. This kind of drop is either a chain liquidation explosion or a late-stage liquidation after distribution; not chasing it, though, makes me worry it’ll suddenly rebound like before, missing out on the “bottom-picking” alpha.

The data itself doesn’t lie: before July 22, the price was still trading sideways around $35 with moderate volume. Then over the next two days, it was smashed straight through. Over 24 hours, volume surged from $54M to $144M, suggesting a large amount of shares changed hands below $6. But the question is—after the turnover, is it accumulation or still continued distribution? From $47 to $2.2, there’s almost no meaningful rebound in between. That implies the people who chased high were essentially buried, and the low-price buyers may have become the new source of liquidity.

What I care about most is whether trading volume can continue to shrink afterward. If, over the next few days, volume contracts and price stabilizes around $2, there might be a chance for an oversold rebound. But if it keeps drifting lower on continued volume expansion, it would mean panic sellers haven’t fully cleared out yet—and there may be more downside.

$DEXE ’s market cap is still $216M, ranked #257. It’s not a zero-to-zero wipeout, but it’s 95% away from its ATH, and on the narrative side there’s no sign of any new catalysts.

There’s no standard answer to this problem—only a choice of costs. Which way do you lean toward:

A. Go in lightly at $2.2 to test the waters, set a stop loss at $1.8, and bet on a 10–20% rebound;
B. Wait for it to fall back below $1.5, then decide based on volume;
C. Completely give up—don’t touch this kind of “wreckage” with a 90% drawdown.

Which option is closest to your decision logic?
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number