剩者为王Pi

To be honest, it's not that Bitcoin is not 'concealed' enough; it's that using it to transfer assets is purely a dead end! It's all traps, and even a slightly intelligent corrupt official wouldn't choose that. Today, I'll chat with you about the intricacies involved.

First and foremost, the most fatal issue—cashing out is too difficult! Moreover, it can't be hidden at all.
The money of corrupt officials is not a small amount. If they want to exchange Bitcoin for cash, they can only go through exchanges. But all exchanges require real-name verification! Every transaction record is clear and transparent, equivalent to voluntarily handing over evidence.
What's more critical is that exchanging cash must go through the bank. If a large sum of money suddenly comes in, the bank will definitely investigate. Even if no problems are found at the time, traces will be left, and sooner or later issues will arise. In the end, it's like having Bitcoin lying in the wallet, not daring to move it, unable to spend or exchange it, just like it's useless.

Sister, let's talk about how to 'grasp' scientists with operational thinking.

Hello, Sister! I've been pondering our Alpha airdrop issue lately. I feel that relying purely on technical offense and defense is indeed a bottomless pit; you attack, I defend, and we are forever upgrading without an end. So I came up with a new idea—rather than competing with scientists on technology, why not use operational means to raise their costs, blocking their advantages, and fundamentally making them feel that it’s 'not worth the effort', gradually leading them to withdraw. I want to share two specific ideas with you, and I hope you can review them.

The first is to borrow the 'false start rule' from athletes, directly blocking the robot's 'fast hand speed'. In sprint races, if you start within 0.1 seconds after the starting gun goes off, it's considered a false start, because experts have already tested that human reaction nerves cannot be faster than this. Isn't it the same logic when we grab Alpha airdrops? Real people entering verification codes and completing operations must have a physiological time limit, for example, after entering the verification code and confirming submission, it must take at least a fraction of a second (the specific time threshold needs to be measured by product and technical experts to find the limits of real people).

Pi Network's founding team infighting exposed: co-founders accused of misappropriating $20 million in funds, Pi coin's market value falls out of Top 50. As the price of PI (Pi Coin) plummeted 22% in the past week and fell to around $0.25, the project has dropped out of the list of the top 50 cryptocurrencies. The main reasons for this crash and the wavering community confidence point to the core team's long silence and the delay in launching the mainnet. A more serious crisis comes from legal accusations against former executives, claiming that the co-founders misused $20 million of early financing funds and that there are internal equity disputes and workplace conflicts, which severely question Pi Network's vision of 'community first' as well as the project's transparency and governance. Former executives' accusations: the whereabouts of $20 million funds are a mystery, and internal conflicts are exposed. Pi Network is facing its most severe trust crisis since its establishment. Legal documents from former executive McPhilip reveal financial opacity and severe power struggles within the core team. Fund misuse and equity dilution disputes: McPhilip claims he was unfairly ousted from the project and accused co-founders Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis and Chengdiao Fan of mishandling financial resources. Court documents show that during the financing from 2019 to 2020, the company was valued at $20 million, but the co-founders attempted to dilute McPhilip's ownership by issuing new shares at a low price of $0.00005 per share. Internal strife within the core team and 'toxic work environment': Legal documents from 2020 revealed internal disputes among co-founders, leading to a 'toxic work environment' at mainstream CEX. McPhilip claims that after internal conflicts escalated, he was revoked access to the company's servers, financial accounts, and operational tools. Community skepticism: Community members expressed strong dissatisfaction with the core team's silence and the failure of ecosystem development. Well-known community member Mr. Spock bluntly stated: 'The core team received $20 million in funding in 2019. They could have used this funding in 2020 to build a complete ecosystem with 100 applications, but they concealed funding information from the community and investors. The core team has always had the funds to properly build Pi Network but is plagued by conflicts over control and personal issues of the founders.' Market performance: Pi coin falls out of the top 50, lack of use cases becomes a fatal blow. Under the combined effect of internal disputes and external skepticism, Pi coin's market performance continues to languish, and investor confidence is undermined. Price collapse and ranking decline: The price of Pi coin fell 25% in the past week, dropping to the support level of $0.25. This drop has caused the altcoin to fall out of the top 50 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, despite previous rumors of being listed on mainstream CEX. Notably, the project had once surged into the top 15 earlier this year. Mainnet delays and lack of use cases: The core team continues to delay the mainnet launch and has failed to present concrete development plans, which is the main reason for large-scale sell-offs. Community members generally believe that the team lacks the effort to build the Pi Network ecosystem, leading to a lack of fundamental utility for Pi coin on mainstream CEX. The contradiction of 'global consensus value': The core team continues to promote the 'global consensus value (GCV)' of mainstream CEX, pegging each Pi coin at the absurdly high price of $314,159, which is severely inconsistent with the current actual trading price of around $0.26. This lack of clarity and detachment from reality further undermines supporters' trust. Future outlook and market warnings: Although the Pi Core Team is still conducting technical updates such as Protocol v23 on the testnet, the conflicts among the founders and questions about the use of funds have fundamentally challenged the project's transparency, governance, and community vision. Co-founder Chengdiao Fan is expected to attend the TOKEN2049 event from October 1 to 2 this week, which may be a key opportunity for the core team to break their silence and respond to community doubts. The market will closely watch whether the core team can provide clear and convincing explanations on key issues such as legal disputes, financial transparency, and the launch of the mainnet; otherwise, the downward pressure on Pi coin will continue to increase. Conclusion: The crisis faced by Pi Network has escalated from a simple delay in technological development to a trust crisis involving fund misuse and internal governance. Against the backdrop of a lack of transparency and core use cases, the price and market capitalization ranking of Pi coin have significantly declined, reflecting the market's loss of confidence in the project. The core team must confront and respond to the accusations of former executives and the calls from the community with tangible actions rather than hollow visions to rebuild trust; otherwise, their mainstream CEX 'community-first' philosophy will become empty talk, and the future of the project will be filled with uncertainty. Disclaimer: This article is news information and does not constitute any investment advice. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and investors should make cautious decisions.