10,092 complaints in 90 days: 9,803 Brits find they can’t transfer their money to crypto platforms 🦖

A report published on October 20 by crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto found that in the 90 days from May to August this year, UK bank customers filed a total of 10,092 complaints, all about the same thing: banks blocking or restricting transfers to platforms regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. The complaints came from 9,803 different people and covered all 650 UK parliamentary constituencies. Not a single area was exempt. ⚖️

Looking at individual banks, Lloyds Banking Group alone received 2,297 complaints, accounting for more than 22% of the total. Barclays received 1,569, NatWest Group 1,278, and HSBC UK more than 1,000. Virgin Money had the fewest complaints, with 103, followed by The Co-operative Bank with 76.

Here’s what’s truly unusual: the report divided banks into three groups. Six banks with clearly defined limits received a total of 6,198 complaints. Lloyds and another digital bank, neither of which had any public policy, together received 2,842. Banks that outright banned all crypto transfers received just 989 complaints. The banks with the strictest bans were, ironically, the quietest—because customers didn’t even bother trying.

How restrictive are the limits? Barclays allows £2,500 per transaction and £10,000 every 30 days. NatWest allows £1,000 per day and £5,000 every 30 days. Santander allows £1,000 per transaction and £3,000 every 30 days. And six banks simply draw a hard line and ban all crypto transfers. 📉

Another set of figures cited in the report makes the problem even clearer. In a 2025 survey by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and YouGov, 13% of crypto users said they’d had problems withdrawing money into their bank accounts—the most common negative experience reported. The UK Cryptoasset Business Council estimated in January this year that around 40% of transfers to the UK’s ten largest platforms were blocked or delayed. At one platform, rejected transactions came close to £1 billion in a single year.

My take: the real debate isn’t whether fraud prevention matters, but how the costs are shared. When a bank blocks a transfer, it avoids fines and reputational risk. The customer pays in time, missed trading opportunities, and repeated phone calls to prove they’ve done nothing wrong. Worse, the rules aren’t transparent. Customers can’t use a bank’s published policy to predict whether their money will be allowed through. Different branches and customer service representatives at the same bank may give different answers. That uncertainty is a cost in itself. The report calls on regulators and the Treasury to make their position clear: industry-wide blanket restrictions are disproportionate. The UK’s new crypto regulatory framework is due to take effect next year, so this issue will need a consistent answer sooner or later. 👀

Do you think banks block crypto transfers to protect customers, or just to save themselves trouble? Join the conversation in the comments. Has anyone you know been affected?

Every day, we bring you the latest on crypto regulation—not just what’s happening, but the logic and opportunities behind it. 👀🚀 Tap the profile picture to watch the livestream