Daily CAKE emissions are proposed to be cut by 69%, but the V3 fee buyback-and-burn mechanism may also be discontinued. This is a public discussion of PancakeSwap’s “The Flip” proposal, not a rule that has been implemented.
The disagreement is over whether issuing less CAKE can make up for the loss of V3’s burn mechanism. Both reports mention the emission cut and an adjustment to how V3 fees are allocated; one says the revenue is proposed to go to liquidity providers and the team treasury. They offer corroborating leads about the discussion, but are no substitute for the original proposal or the final governance outcome.
The formal terms, vote, and implementation still need to be checked, followed by changes in new issuance and the actual amount burned. If this improves liquidity but reduces the value the token derives from V3, how should the market weigh that trade-off?
The disagreement is over whether issuing less CAKE can make up for the loss of V3’s burn mechanism. Both reports mention the emission cut and an adjustment to how V3 fees are allocated; one says the revenue is proposed to go to liquidity providers and the team treasury. They offer corroborating leads about the discussion, but are no substitute for the original proposal or the final governance outcome.
The formal terms, vote, and implementation still need to be checked, followed by changes in new issuance and the actual amount burned. If this improves liquidity but reduces the value the token derives from V3, how should the market weigh that trade-off?