$UNI $HYPE SEC approval to conduct limited trading of tokenized stocks on-chain
This was already raised during the Clear Bill, but after the bill was not passed, it was still brought out anyway—some issues that hadn’t been resolved still remain like this.
However, in terms of implementation, it still provided clear guidance, which represents a fundamental long-term change for Uni. Of course, it’s also the case for DeFi.
But I think it may not necessarily be good news for big BTC and smaller BTC, because previously they served as the underlying base for the on-chain ecosystem. As tokenized stocks gradually go deeper into the liquidity layer, what may be eroded is their foundation. This is a long-term matter. It’s also not out of the question that, under AI-driven strategy setups, allocating to big BTC could be more attractive than allocating to gold.
$ZEC should have trapped a lot of people—from big holders to small retail traders. Don’t listen to any narrative it sells you; it’s purely the trading behavior after chips are locked. As long as your position control is even slightly careless, you’ll get devoured. Be especially cautious if you see it confidently liquidate at a break price of 2000 or above. Because it quietly changes the risk-reward ratio of your trade at the time. Back then, if you hadn’t cut losses, just imagine what today’s scenario would look like.
As the coin price rises, shorts become even rarer. When the main players push the price up, it’s because they spend their own money rather than using short-sale fuel, which can easily lead to situations where everyone ends up killing everyone. Only then is it appropriate to enter and short—on the condition that you don’t buy into this bunch of nonsense stories it’s selling.
~~
The rebound in Zhipu and other AI-related stocks has pulled up follower/duplicate-trading accounts as well; it’s just that the people are long gone. I’ve said this many times, but it still can’t change this situation. Many people just can’t stomach these kinds of larger drawdowns, and that’s definitely understandable.
But in my way of thinking, if you want to make money from investing, you always need to achieve a jump in account performance through big profits from big positions. That big position can be a single asset, or multiple assets within a sector, or even an index. No matter when it is, small-position scattered trades are suitable for quantitative trading—winning relies on volume. The approach is completely different.
For now, that’s it.
This was already raised during the Clear Bill, but after the bill was not passed, it was still brought out anyway—some issues that hadn’t been resolved still remain like this.
However, in terms of implementation, it still provided clear guidance, which represents a fundamental long-term change for Uni. Of course, it’s also the case for DeFi.
But I think it may not necessarily be good news for big BTC and smaller BTC, because previously they served as the underlying base for the on-chain ecosystem. As tokenized stocks gradually go deeper into the liquidity layer, what may be eroded is their foundation. This is a long-term matter. It’s also not out of the question that, under AI-driven strategy setups, allocating to big BTC could be more attractive than allocating to gold.
$ZEC should have trapped a lot of people—from big holders to small retail traders. Don’t listen to any narrative it sells you; it’s purely the trading behavior after chips are locked. As long as your position control is even slightly careless, you’ll get devoured. Be especially cautious if you see it confidently liquidate at a break price of 2000 or above. Because it quietly changes the risk-reward ratio of your trade at the time. Back then, if you hadn’t cut losses, just imagine what today’s scenario would look like.
As the coin price rises, shorts become even rarer. When the main players push the price up, it’s because they spend their own money rather than using short-sale fuel, which can easily lead to situations where everyone ends up killing everyone. Only then is it appropriate to enter and short—on the condition that you don’t buy into this bunch of nonsense stories it’s selling.
~~
The rebound in Zhipu and other AI-related stocks has pulled up follower/duplicate-trading accounts as well; it’s just that the people are long gone. I’ve said this many times, but it still can’t change this situation. Many people just can’t stomach these kinds of larger drawdowns, and that’s definitely understandable.
But in my way of thinking, if you want to make money from investing, you always need to achieve a jump in account performance through big profits from big positions. That big position can be a single asset, or multiple assets within a sector, or even an index. No matter when it is, small-position scattered trades are suitable for quantitative trading—winning relies on volume. The approach is completely different.
For now, that’s it.