Yesterday, cz's debate on Bitcoin and gold was very exciting.
cz pointed out that verifying gold is very difficult and requires damaging the gold itself.
But does this mean that the scarcity of gold does not constitute value? Archimedes invented the method of displacement 2000 years ago, calculating density by measuring mass and volume.
Even if it is true, as cz says, that the difficulty of verifying gold means it has no value? Or does the difficulty of verifying gold mean that Bitcoin is definitely superior to gold? The two do not seem to be a mutually exclusive relationship.
Is there no fake Bitcoin? If someone is a novice, they might really be unable to distinguish between a real and fake Bitcoin. Stablecoins can be faked and packaged into scams, not to mention Bitcoin; the complexity of blockchain is such that there must be a certain threshold. Who comes in and immediately knows what a public chain is, or what this coin or that coin is?
