Judgment criteria of Dogecoin in the currency circle and summary of practical experience

I charged 50 local dogs, failed 35 times, and succeeded 15 times. I studied dozens of local dogs and compared other people's experience. The summary is as follows:

Judgment criteria for the Tugou project:

1. The more contract addresses, the better, at least 3 or more;

2. Have official website, Twitter, Telegram, Facebook, white paper, open source code, GitHub code update;

3. There are few airdrops, no pre-sales, private placements, or IDOs, so everyone starts from the same starting line;

4. The dextool score is higher than 95;

5. The pool is more than 400,000 U;

6. Most of the currency holding addresses are integers, which means that this project has SM, and there may be a market crash after it goes online;

7. LP must have a lock-up period. The longer the period and the larger the amount, the better.

8. The higher the community activity, the better. It helps to judge whether the people in the community are real or fake, whether the speech is regular, and whether they are just trying to get people to buy.

9. If the project party discloses the person in charge, check whether the person in charge’s information is true. LinkedIn information can be falsified. Check whether he has a lot of historical work experience and a lot of interactions.

10. Don’t fantasize about getting rich by holding on to a local dog and expecting the stock to increase hundreds or thousands of times over within a few months or a year. That kind of thing is hard to come by. 99% of people are just trying to take advantage of the situation. Sell it when the stock price increases several times. Don’t be greedy and look for the next one.