yapeswap

Another textbook case of “seizing control despite having very little voting power in governance.”

According to security sources including SlowMist, Yapeswap was attacked and lost about $21,900. The attacker exploited the very low voting power required under WorkersUnion’s governance mechanism to take over the feeToSetter permissions for YapeFactory, then deployed a malicious contract to drain the funds. The amount was small, but the pattern is a classic one.

How to read this: small-cap governance + excessive permissions = a low-cost takeover. Project teams should check whether key roles can be changed through proposals with low thresholds, whether there are timelocks or multisigs, and whether fee-related permissions are overly centralized. Users shouldn’t take “low governance participation” as a good sign—it often means there’s an opening for an attack. Even small losses are worth noting; the next exploit of the same kind could be much bigger.

#Yapeswap #慢雾 #治理攻击 #DeFiSecurity