v23protocol

The Time Bomb of 'Dynamic Assets': Who Decides When V23 Assets Should 'Transform'?
Uncle sees that everyone is talking about how the V23 protocol can make assets 'dynamic', but as hardcore players, we must ask the most critical question: Where is the trigger mechanism?

1. Is it a smart contract, or 'human control'?
If the attribute changes of an NFT rely on the project team manually modifying the database, then this is called pseudo Web3. True dynamic assets must have a decentralized trigger source.
Vanar ($VANRY )'s solution is to treat the Kayon AI engine as a 'referee'. Through AI's real-time monitoring of on-chain data (such as game results and RWA market prices), it automatically triggers attribute changes of V23 assets. This sounds perfect, but the technical threshold is extremely high—how can you ensure that the data read by AI is real?

2. The Trust Crisis of Oracles
This is the 'fatal flaw' that Uncle wants to point out.
When V23 assets need to change form based on information from the external world (such as temperature, exchange rates, and game results), they are extremely reliant on oracles. If the data source is compromised or there is a delay in the oracle, your dynamic assets may experience 'logical collapse'. For example, equipment that was supposed to become stronger at night could transform during the day due to data delays, which would be disastrous in the arena.

Uncle summarizes:
Dynamic assets are the future of Web3, but the decentralization of the 'trigger rights' is the real battleground. The V23 protocol has made a good start, but how to establish an immutable and unbiased AI trigger mechanism is the key to whether Vanar can maintain its leading position. Don’t just look at how cool the asset transformations are; pay attention to who is pulling the trigger behind the scenes.
#Vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain #V23Protocol