cz与schiff辩论
297 views
2 Discussing
Hot
Latest
See original
CZ and Peter Schiff engage in a heated debate over the value of Bitcoin and gold
On December 4th, at the 2025 Binance Blockchain Week held in Dubai, Zhao Changpeng (CZ) and Peter Schiff engaged in a fierce debate, reigniting the dispute over the value of Bitcoin and gold.
In a heated debate lasting an hour, both sides discussed digital currencies, physical assets, and the core definitions of value today, laying the groundwork for a new round of global dialogue on such topics.
The core of this debate mainly revolved around value, scarcity, and practical use. CZ, as a staunch advocate for Bitcoin, emphasized the definitive advantages of BTC as a digital asset, namely its fixed total supply (21 million), transparent supply, and ease of verification.
CZ brought out a gold bar on stage and pointed out that unlike gold, which requires complex tests to verify its authenticity, the ownership and authenticity of Bitcoin are clear on the blockchain. Therefore, in the long run, Bitcoin's performance will surpass that of gold.
On the other hand, Schiff defended the physical attributes and historical status of gold, criticizing Bitcoin for having "no physical backing," lacking industrial use, and being highly volatile, with most of its activities being speculative rather than actual payments, thus cannot be considered a reliable currency.
Moreover, the two had differing views on payment practicality. Schiff believes that crypto payment cards essentially still convert cryptocurrency into fiat currency first; CZ rebutted that the core demand for using payment tools is speed and convenience, and that the underlying asset conversion logic does not affect the user experience, and cryptocurrency payments are currently widely used.
Observers believe that Schiff defends a traditional value concept based on physical assets and history, while CZ depicts a future financial landscape that is borderless, programmable, and more suited to the digital age.
In summary, this debate is far more than just a war of words between the two; it is essentially a fierce clash of two entirely different asset paradigms and value philosophies on a public stage, and its impact will extend into broader public awareness and investment choices.
Finally, which asset do you think has more value, Bitcoin or gold? Leave your thoughts and insights in the comments.
#CZ与Schiff辩论
On December 4th, at the 2025 Binance Blockchain Week held in Dubai, Zhao Changpeng (CZ) and Peter Schiff engaged in a fierce debate, reigniting the dispute over the value of Bitcoin and gold.
In a heated debate lasting an hour, both sides discussed digital currencies, physical assets, and the core definitions of value today, laying the groundwork for a new round of global dialogue on such topics.
The core of this debate mainly revolved around value, scarcity, and practical use. CZ, as a staunch advocate for Bitcoin, emphasized the definitive advantages of BTC as a digital asset, namely its fixed total supply (21 million), transparent supply, and ease of verification.
CZ brought out a gold bar on stage and pointed out that unlike gold, which requires complex tests to verify its authenticity, the ownership and authenticity of Bitcoin are clear on the blockchain. Therefore, in the long run, Bitcoin's performance will surpass that of gold.
On the other hand, Schiff defended the physical attributes and historical status of gold, criticizing Bitcoin for having "no physical backing," lacking industrial use, and being highly volatile, with most of its activities being speculative rather than actual payments, thus cannot be considered a reliable currency.
Moreover, the two had differing views on payment practicality. Schiff believes that crypto payment cards essentially still convert cryptocurrency into fiat currency first; CZ rebutted that the core demand for using payment tools is speed and convenience, and that the underlying asset conversion logic does not affect the user experience, and cryptocurrency payments are currently widely used.
Observers believe that Schiff defends a traditional value concept based on physical assets and history, while CZ depicts a future financial landscape that is borderless, programmable, and more suited to the digital age.
In summary, this debate is far more than just a war of words between the two; it is essentially a fierce clash of two entirely different asset paradigms and value philosophies on a public stage, and its impact will extend into broader public awareness and investment choices.
Finally, which asset do you think has more value, Bitcoin or gold? Leave your thoughts and insights in the comments.
#CZ与Schiff辩论
Login to explore more contents