$PIPPIN UPDATE 🚨
We are now trading around $0.73 level, price keep moving upside as from our last update. It's only took some upside liquidity and then moving in empty liquidity area. Also it's still didn't cross his Last ATH.
Also don't fall in rumor's and hype in this stage.No clear analysis can say it will go $1.
So what's the next Move for PIPPIN?
I'm seeing some strong liquidity around $0.8-$0.82 area ,that mean it can break last ATH and create new ATH but RSI Overbought already and those buyer 7-8 Wallet's are connected to each other's, according to bubblemap 80% are from insiders Wallet's.
If Price reach possible liquidity are it may crash sharply to the downside side $0.71→ $0.68→ $0.65 or even more lower $0.56
Use small volume and Leverage on this pair to avoid high volatility move.
Stay safe, sharp, alert and always DYOR,NFA.
$BTR and $SPACE also moving same.
@suplexBTC
I’ve always believed speed alone doesn’t fix on-chain trading. You can have the fastest chain, but if users are stuck signing every action, the experience still feels broken. That’s why Fogo caught my attention.
Their idea is simple. Trading is a flow, not a single transaction. So instead of asking for approval every time, they introduce Sessions. I give permission once, with clear limits and time boundaries. They’re able to place, adjust, or cancel orders without slowing me down, and I still stay in control.
The system is built to work with familiar wallets, not force new habits. That matters. It feels closer to how modern apps work, not old crypto UX patterns.
What excites me is that this isn’t just about traders. The same model can support automation, recurring actions, and safer DeFi for normal users.
Fogo feels less like a fast chain and more like a permission upgrade for Web3.
#fogo $FOGO @fogo
🚨 X just tightened the screws on automation, and the market is pricing a “proof-of-personhood” arms race led by OpenAI + World.
X is actively purging incentive-driven automation while reports say OpenAI is prototyping a “real-humans-only” social feed that could lean on biometric verification like World’s Orb or Face ID.
🧹 What X actually did (not vibes)
🚫 X moved against InfoFi / incentivized-posting apps tied to reward-based engagement farming and spam, via API/policy enforcement.
⚙️ X’s own automation rules explicitly allow action against accounts/apps that violate anti-spam / manipulation policies.
🧠 Why “X fears OpenAI” is a spicy narrative—but still speculation
🧩 The timing makes the storyline tempting, but motive (“fearing”) isn’t proven—what’s proven is X is reacting to spam + automated amplification incentives.
📌 The credible catalyst is the reported OpenAI prototype for a social network, which would directly compete for attention + creator liquidity if it ships.
👁️ Why $WLD got dragged into the center of the trade
📈 Reports linking OpenAI’s anti-bot social concept to biometric “proof of personhood” sparked reflexive repricing in WLD (classic narrative beta).
🧱 World’s core pitch is human verification infrastructure (World ID / Orb) for an AI-saturated internet.
💰 How traders are positioning this (framework, not hype)
🟢 WLD = call option on “proof-of-personhood becomes mandatory middleware” for social networks, payments, and anti-sybil systems.
🟡 Attention meta shift: if X kills incentive spam, tokenized attention models migrate to smaller networks or evolve into KYC/identity-gated programs.
$WLD