My stance first, because this one actually changed my behaviour: when withdrawals reopen, my long-term stack is leaving the exchange. The trading stack stays — but the hold stack doesn't.

Here's why the hack rewired my thinking. An exchange balance isn't a wallet in your name; it's a claim against pooled, exchange-controlled assets. That's fine until the custodian's own infrastructure gets hit — and $6.3B taken in one night, even with ~$3B frozen and a $6.34B backstop promised, is the kind of lesson you only need once. $BTC is still near $77,574, and that price is the market saying it hasn't fully forgiven this yet.

But I'm not going to pretend self-custody is free. A hardware wallet removes exchange risk, withdrawal freezes and hot-wallet hacks from your life — and hands you the seed phrase, the backups and the transaction checks instead. Lose those and nobody can help you. That's the real trade, and it's why the all-or-nothing takes on both sides annoy me.

So where do you stand when the doors reopen?

A) Move everything to self-custody
B) Split it — long-term stack off, trading stack on
C) Stay on the exchange, trust the backstop and Monday's reserves report
D) Spread across several exchanges instead

I'm in camp B. What's your vote — and has this week actually changed where you keep your coins?