Jeff Yan, founder of Hyperliquid, says the U.S. should regulate the firms that use its blockchain, not the network itself.

📌 The news

Jeff Yan told Bloomberg that regulatory focus belong on the trading platforms operating on Hyperliquid’s blockchain, rather than the underlying protocol. He argues this approach would protect innovation while ensuring market integrity.

🔍 Why it matters

Applying oversight to the entities that interact with the blockchain could curb fraud and manipulation without stifling the technology’s development. It also signals a nuanced view of decentralised finance, distinguishing between code and its commercial use.

📊 The numbers

Hyperliquid’s native token $HYPE has drawn attention from traders seeking high‑speed, low‑fee derivatives. While specific price data wasn’t disclosed, the discussion around regulation often influences token sentiment and liquidity.

⚖ Bull vs bear case

Bull: Targeted regulation could boost confidence, attract institutional users, and drive $HYPE adoption.

Bear: Uncertainty around future rules might deter participants and limit growth if compliance costs rise.

👀 What to watch next

Monitor U.S. regulatory statements on DeFi platforms and any formal guidance that distinguishes protocol layers from service providers. The response from other blockchain projects could set a broader precedent.

━━━━━━━━━━━━

💡 My take: Yan’s proposal tries to balance innovation with investor protection, a path that could foster sustainable growth for Hyperliquid if regulators embrace the distinction.

💬 Do you think focusing oversight on firms rather than the blockchain will help the ecosystem?