Cross-Chain Doesn't Always Mean Same Token → Same Token
Imagine holding Token A on one blockchain.
You want Token B on another.
A cross-chain swap can potentially handle both parts of that journey when a supported route and resolver quote are available.
So the flow becomes:
Asset A + Source Chain → Asset B + Destination Chain
That's different from simply bridging Token A.
You're changing both:
• Blockchain
• Asset
The infrastructure behind the route has to coordinate execution across networks.
For users, the value is reducing the number of separate steps involved.
For developers, the complexity moves into routing and settlement infrastructure.
#STONfi #Omniston #TON
$XDP
Imagine holding Token A on one blockchain.
You want Token B on another.
A cross-chain swap can potentially handle both parts of that journey when a supported route and resolver quote are available.
So the flow becomes:
Asset A + Source Chain → Asset B + Destination Chain
That's different from simply bridging Token A.
You're changing both:
• Blockchain
• Asset
The infrastructure behind the route has to coordinate execution across networks.
For users, the value is reducing the number of separate steps involved.
For developers, the complexity moves into routing and settlement infrastructure.
#STONfi #Omniston #TON
$XDP