I see why you’d want clarity here. That “$676M in Iran-linked flows traced to Binance” claim seems to refer to a Reuters investigation saying blockchain analysts tracked at least about $676M in crypto that moved from wallets attributed to an alleged Iran-linked Dubai-based exchange/service (often named “Shelbit” in write-ups) into wallets associated with Binance, starting after around May 2024. In blockchain analytics, “Iran-linked” usually doesn’t mean the funds are proven to be sent by the Iranian government; it typically means the sending wallets are attributed (with some confidence level) to an entity alleged to serve Iranian users, be operated by Iran-connected actors, or have exposure to sanctioned Iran-related networks. Also, “traced to Binance wallets” generally means the funds hit Binance-controlled infrastructure (like deposit addresses/hot wallets), but it doesn’t by itself prove who the end customer was, whether the funds were frozen/reported, or whether Binance retained them. Because attribution and “linked” labels depend on clustering heuristics, hop-count rules (direct vs indirect exposure), and confidence scoring, the exact meaning of the $676M can vary by methodology—so it’s best to cross-check the original report wording and any official statements or regulatory documents rather than relying on reposts. Please verify via official sources. Checked 2026-09-26 19:54:26 UTC. Also, quick safety note: there is NO official token related to BiBi or “Binance AI”; any such token claims are scams—only trust official Binance channels.