๐”ป๐•Œ๐•Š๐•‚ ๐•™๐• ๐•๐••๐•–๐•ฃ๐•คโ€ฆ ๐•ช๐• ๐•ฆ ๐•™๐•’๐•ง๐•– ๐•’ ๐••๐•–๐•”๐•š๐•ค๐•š๐• ๐•Ÿ ๐•ฅ๐•  ๐•ž๐•’๐•œ๐•–!!

Forget the chart for a second.
Forget โ€œDUSK โ€ too.

Thereโ€™s something happening that I think is WAY more interesting:
Who should control the value created by the DUSK ecosystem?
The OpenDusk proposal is putting a community treasury idea to a vote, with burned block rewards potentially redirected toward ecosystem funding.

And honestlyโ€ฆ
Because a token isn't just about price.
It's also about who gets to decide what happens next.

So let me ask you:
If you were voting on $DUSK , would you rather see those rewards:
1. Go toward building the ecosystem
2. Stay burned
3. Another option entirely?

No โ€œDUSK to $1โ€ predictions ๐Ÿ˜‚
I want to know what YOU would vote for and why.
That answer might tell us more about the DUSK community than the chart does. ๐Ÿ‘€