Previously I looked at how Dusk separates tokenization from native issuance in theory ....what I keep coming back to now is the operational risk difference between the two in practice. Tokenized assets still need reconciliation between the token and whatever sits behind it off-chain......that's a persistent failure point every RWA project has to manage forever. Native issuance removes that duplicated bookkeeping by design, since there's no separate off-chain record to reconcile against.
That's a structural advantage, not just a technical preference, if it can actually be executed within existing securities law.
What I don't know yet is how regulators respond once native issuance moves from documentation to live regulated products at scale.
I'm watching the first fully native security issued on Dusk, not another tokenized wrapper.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
That's a structural advantage, not just a technical preference, if it can actually be executed within existing securities law.
What I don't know yet is how regulators respond once native issuance moves from documentation to live regulated products at scale.
I'm watching the first fully native security issued on Dusk, not another tokenized wrapper.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
