Most gossip protocols assume a message either arrives or it doesn't, but Dusk's Kadcast builds in redundancy at the bucket level so a single failed hop isn't the end of the story. If one peer drops the message, there are others in the same bucket who can still carry it forward, which means propagation doesn't hinge on any one node behaving well...🧐 I like that the design assumes failure rather than hoping to avoid it... it feels more honest about how real networks actually behave than protocols that assume everyone stays online. Still, more redundant paths means more messages moving through the network for the same piece of data, and that tradeoff rarely gets talked about...🔍
Does that redundancy scale cleanly as Dusk's network grows, or does it start costing more than it saves?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
$PROM
$UAI