The market really knows how to make you look twice. $PEOPLE $ENA

Both showing some serious strength on the chart.

I’m starting to think the real skill is not finding the movers it’s finding them before they move.

I used to think building directly on a blockchain’s native environment was automatically the better option.

Then I looked closer at DuskVM.

DuskVM gives developers direct access to Dusk’s Layer 1 environment. Smart contracts can use Dusk specific primitives and interact closely with the network’s native capabilities.

That sounds like an obvious advantage until you look at the other side.

Building directly on Dusk also means working with tooling designed specifically for DuskVM. Developers coming from established ecosystems may already be comfortable with familiar languages frameworks and development workflows.

So there is a real trade off.

You get closer access to the L1 but you also move further away from the tooling you already know.

That made me think about DuskVM differently.

The question isn’t simply whether Dusk’s native execution environment is powerful.

It’s whether access to Dusk’s own primitives is valuable enough for developers to accept a more specialized development experience.

For applications that need capabilities closely tied to Dusk’s architecture that trade off could make sense.

But for developers who mainly want familiar tools and workflows the learning curve may matter just as much as the technology itself.

Infrastructure isn’t only about what developers can build.

It’s also about what they’re willing to learn to build it.

@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk

What matters more for developers?