Thinking about this right now I was digging into TermMax's architecture and one tiny detail honestly just made me stop and pause
Why on earth would a protocol bother setting up entirely separate whitelists for adapters order callbacks and pools Why not just use one single general whitelist and call it a day
At first glance it just looks like a minor developer choice But thinking about it more it's actually super smart
I mean look at DeFi Pools adapters and callbacks are doing totally different jobs If you lump them all together under one blanket permission you end up giving stuff way more access than it actually needs
For me, real security isn't just about blocking bad contracts It’s also about strictly limiting what an approved piece of code is allowed to touch Cutting down on unnecessary trust is everything
Got me wondering how well this permission model is going to hold up and scale as TermMax keeps rolling out new markets and integrations
Anyone else look at this part of the codebase What do you think
#termmax @TermMax
Why on earth would a protocol bother setting up entirely separate whitelists for adapters order callbacks and pools Why not just use one single general whitelist and call it a day
At first glance it just looks like a minor developer choice But thinking about it more it's actually super smart
I mean look at DeFi Pools adapters and callbacks are doing totally different jobs If you lump them all together under one blanket permission you end up giving stuff way more access than it actually needs
For me, real security isn't just about blocking bad contracts It’s also about strictly limiting what an approved piece of code is allowed to touch Cutting down on unnecessary trust is everything
Got me wondering how well this permission model is going to hold up and scale as TermMax keeps rolling out new markets and integrations
Anyone else look at this part of the codebase What do you think
#termmax @TermMax