During the CreatorPad task, what stayed with me about Dusk was how its governance test for community-driven growth actually begins. $DUSK , #dusk , @Dusk , frames OpenDusk as handing direction to the community via a treasury fed by the ~11.8M previously unminted block rewards (plus ~6.8M yearly) that had effectively acted as a continuous burn. Yet the mechanism that reaches the vote is a five-member committee that sources and refines every proposal before any stake-weighted decision occurs, and eligibility itself is narrowed to active provisioners who both secure the network and have performed a stake operation in the prior three months. The promised broader growth sits downstream of that filter. I keep wondering whether the first real beneficiaries of this shift are the same active stakers already securing the chain, or whether the structure can open further once the initial redirection is live.