@Dusk_Foundation Tokenization is the easy part. Taking an existing security and putting it on a blockchain solves little. The real test comes when the asset is created natively on-chain, with its legal and disclosure rules built into how it is issued and settled from day one.

Native issuance on @Dusk_Foundation changes the incentives. The asset is born inside a confidential smart-contract environment where disclosure can be configured around what remains private and what becomes available to authorized parties.

An EU-licensed institution can follow the rules required by places like NPEX without showing every detail to the whole market. Deterministic finality can cut the extra settlement risk and cost that still sits on many tokenized assets.

Market makers adjust.

They gain protection from early information leaks, but lose the free trading signals that open order books normally give them. Their spreads then depend on how much verified data the issuer chooses to share. Share too little and secondary trading dries up, turning the native advantage into an illiquid private ledger.

The key assumption is that regulated players will accept less public information in return for private, instant settlement.

That assumption can be tested: watch whether the first sales turn into steady secondary trading after promotional liquidity ends.Until then, native issuance remains the harder and more revealing test for any real-world asset stack—including

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk