Dusk’s ~2-second finality makes more sense when you realize the chain may not be where the actual deal happens.
Parties can negotiate privately off-chain, then use Dusk to cryptographically settle the agreement. In that model, speed isn’t mainly about processing huge trading volume—it’s about making an agreed settlement final quickly.
That also gives $DUSK staking a deeper role. Validators stake value to secure consensus and settlement, putting economic weight behind the network’s finality.
So maybe TVL and transaction count don’t tell the full Dusk story. If meaningful financial activity happens privately before reaching the chain, the more interesting metric could eventually be the value of agreements being settled and secured.
Dusk may be less about putting finance on-chain—and more about giving private finance a cryptographic final word.
@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK #DUSK
Parties can negotiate privately off-chain, then use Dusk to cryptographically settle the agreement. In that model, speed isn’t mainly about processing huge trading volume—it’s about making an agreed settlement final quickly.
That also gives $DUSK staking a deeper role. Validators stake value to secure consensus and settlement, putting economic weight behind the network’s finality.
So maybe TVL and transaction count don’t tell the full Dusk story. If meaningful financial activity happens privately before reaching the chain, the more interesting metric could eventually be the value of agreements being settled and secured.
Dusk may be less about putting finance on-chain—and more about giving private finance a cryptographic final word.
@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK #DUSK