The interesting part about putting financial assets onchain may not be the token itself.
It may be the information surrounding every transaction.

Consider a tokenized ETF traded between two institutions.

The venue may need to verify that both parties are eligible.

The custodian may need proof that settlement conditions were satisfied.

A regulator may later need to investigate one specific transaction.

But none of those parties necessarily needs access to the entire financial history of everyone involved.

That is the problem I find interesting about @Dusk_Foundation .

Dusk is approaching regulated markets with programmable privacy and selective disclosure rather than treating privacy as simply “hiding transactions.”

The same financial activity can potentially remain private from the public, verifiable by the relevant participants, and reviewable by an authorized regulator when necessary.

That sounds simple on paper.

The harder question is whether those disclosure rules can remain practical when thousands of transactions and multiple institutions are involved.

This is where I think DuskEVM and Hedger become particularly interesting. Confidential workflows need to work as part of actual applications, not just as a cryptographic demonstration.

For RWAs to become real financial infrastructure, privacy cannot simply mean less visibility.

It needs to mean the right visibility for the right participant at the right time.

That is the part of Dusk I will be watching most closely.

#dusk $DUSK #creatorpad $BTC