Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan says the SEC could move ahead with crypto rules even while the CLARITY Act remains stuck in Congress, potentially giving the industry a faster route toward regulatory clarity.
The timeline is now more concrete than initially expected. The SEC has scheduled an open meeting for August 14 to consider proposing its first formal “Regulation Crypto” framework for certain digital-asset offerings.
Scenario 1: SEC Moves Ahead With Regulation Crypto
The biggest development could be the SEC formally proposing Regulation Crypto this week.
Hougan described the approach as a “bypass road” around the CLARITY Act, arguing that Congress needs legislation for CLARITY, while the SEC can use its existing authority to create rules and exemptions.
Bloomberg says the SEC has major crypto plans coming.@Bitwise CIO @Matt_Hougan on what they actually are, and why they're bigger than people think:
"This is the bypass road on the CLARITY Act."
"CLARITY is legislation, slow. The SEC can act through regulation. In about a… https://t.co/0V75GoZD7F pic.twitter.com/0INpIvHZA1
— The Rollup (@therollupco) August 11, 2026
The proposed framework could give new crypto projects a pathway to raise capital without immediately triggering full securities registration, followed by a transition toward more decentralized networks.
The idea goes back to the 2018 ICO era, when crypto projects struggled to raise funds while navigating securities laws. Hougan believes clearer rules could unleash a new wave of innovation, saying there could be “a million flowers that bloom.”
But Friday’s action would only start the process. A proposal would still go through public comments and further regulatory steps before becoming final.
Scenario 2: Tokenized Securities Get a New Path
A second possibility is progress on an innovation exemption for tokenized securities.
The SEC is considering ways to make digital versions of traditional securities easier to issue and trade on blockchain networks. That could eventually support 24/7 trading of tokenized stocks and bring parts of traditional equity markets onto blockchain infrastructure.
This fits into Chairman Paul Atkins’ Project Crypto agenda, which has focused on rulemaking, exemptions and clearer digital-asset classifications rather than relying primarily on enforcement.
The SEC is also coordinating with the CFTC on how different crypto assets should be classified.
Scenario 3: SEC Rules Advance While CLARITY Waits
Even if the SEC acts this week, CLARITY would not become irrelevant.
The bill has already passed the House and cleared the Senate Banking Committee, but lawmakers left Washington for the August recess without a Senate floor vote. The legislative process is now expected to resume around September, while disagreements over DeFi, ethics provisions and stablecoin yield remain.
That creates a possible two-track approach: SEC rules could provide a faster regulatory framework, while Congress continues working toward permanent legislation.
What It Could Mean for Crypto
A March SEC-CFTC framework identified BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, LINK, AVAX, DOT, HBAR, LTC, DOGE, SHIB, XTZ, BCH, APT and XLM as digital commodities. The potential SEC proposal would not automatically add more tokens to this list, but could create clearer paths for ETFs, staking products and structured products involving assets already treated as commodities.
SEC votes Friday on Regulation Crypto
These are the only 16 tokens the SEC and CFTC named as digital commodities back in March.$BTC$ETH$SOL$XRP$ADA$LINK$AVAX$DOT$HBAR$LTC$DOGE$SHIB$XTZ$BCH$APT$XLM
That was never a blanket ruling. It was a curated shortlist, and… https://t.co/J30CaOShv2 pic.twitter.com/SiC9BELpXa
— Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) August 11, 2026
If approved, the main benefit would be greater regulatory clarity, which could encourage new crypto projects and bring more traditional financial activity on-chain.
However, SEC rules would not be as permanent as legislation and could still face legal challenges. Friday’s proposal could therefore be an important step, but it would not replace the CLARITY Act.
