Why I Stopped Assuming "Market Making" Meant Makers Only Mention a market-making program to a taker-heavy $BTC desk, and the reaction is almost scripted: "We're takers; that's not for us." 💡 Read the name, skip the fine print, move on. That read isn't unreasonable: "market making" sounds like a maker-only label. But Market Making Program lists market makers, HFT desks, algorithmic traders, and arbitrageurs as participants. The name describes the mechanism, not the membership. https://institutional.whitebit.com/market-making-program?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=mmp_mel&utm_campaign=post WhiteBIT Market Making Program actually gets priced on high-quality flow, whichever side of the book it sits on. ⚖️ The schedule backs that up with dedicated taker terms: 0.020% on spot, 0.025% on futures. Fit isn't generic either: evaluation runs pair by pair against what the books need, sometimes prioritizing takers over makers. That distinction has a real number attached. Taker-heavy and running real size already puts a desk on that list. Worth checking what the flow is priced at instead of stopping at the name. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#