Going into a new week, here's something worth keeping in mind: A pool having a lot of liquidity doesn't automatically mean it's the best pool to use. I used to look at the size of a pool and assume bigger was always better. But there are two things I now pay attention to: Liquidity + trading activity. Liquidity gives traders the capital needed to execute swaps without causing excessive price impact. But trading activity tells you whether that liquidity is actually being used. Think about it this way: A pool could have $1M sitting inside it, but if barely anyone trades through it, there's limited fee activity for LPs. Another pool might have less liquidity but significantly more trading volume, meaning capital is constantly moving through the pool and generating swap fees. That's why when I'm checking pools on @ston_fi , I don't stop at the APR. I look at the liquidity, trading volume, token pair and the fees being generated. For LPs, this matters because swap activity is what creates the fees they can earn. For traders, deeper liquidity can help reduce price impact and slippage. So the lesson I'm taking into this week is simple: **Don't just ask how much liquidity a pool has. Ask how efficiently that liquidity is being used.** That's where the real picture starts to appear. $MUBARAK $UP