Lummis coming in hot with the bipartisan angle
Basically telling Dems: "you really wanna be the ones who killed crypto clarity?"
Smart play tbh. Forces them to either get on board or own the "anti-innovation" label going into election season
The clarity act would finally give us actual rules instead of this regulation-by-enforcement BS we've been dealing with
But let's be real - bipartisan support doesn't mean much when party leadership decides to tank something anyway
Still... putting this pressure publicly? That's how you get fence-sitters to flip
Wild that we're still fighting for basic regulatory clarity in 2025 but here we are 🤷
Basically telling Dems: "you really wanna be the ones who killed crypto clarity?"
Smart play tbh. Forces them to either get on board or own the "anti-innovation" label going into election season
The clarity act would finally give us actual rules instead of this regulation-by-enforcement BS we've been dealing with
But let's be real - bipartisan support doesn't mean much when party leadership decides to tank something anyway
Still... putting this pressure publicly? That's how you get fence-sitters to flip
Wild that we're still fighting for basic regulatory clarity in 2025 but here we are 🤷