Who actually has power in submitting governance decisions on the chain that coordinates Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV)'s environment depends entirely on which of two paths you're standing in.
CLI:
generate a draft file structure the JSON manually submit through a direct transaction command.
Web:
connect a browser wallet fill structured fields confirm through a popup.
The underlying complexity abstracted away.
Neither path grants different rights.
Same transaction same chain same rules regardless of which interface submits it.
What differs is who can comfortably reach that power at all.
Where the limit actually ends:
technical comfort level not the protocol's rules. Someone uncomfortable with CLI isn't blocked from governance they're funneled toward web instead and if that path has its own friction the real ceiling on participation sits there invisible in the docs.
Does having two paths flatten participation or just relocate the real barrier somewhere less visible?
@BabylonLabs_io $BABY
#baby
$ONDO
$ZAMA
CLI:
generate a draft file structure the JSON manually submit through a direct transaction command.
Web:
connect a browser wallet fill structured fields confirm through a popup.
The underlying complexity abstracted away.
Neither path grants different rights.
Same transaction same chain same rules regardless of which interface submits it.
What differs is who can comfortably reach that power at all.
Where the limit actually ends:
technical comfort level not the protocol's rules. Someone uncomfortable with CLI isn't blocked from governance they're funneled toward web instead and if that path has its own friction the real ceiling on participation sits there invisible in the docs.
Does having two paths flatten participation or just relocate the real barrier somewhere less visible?
@BabylonLabs_io $BABY
#baby
$ONDO
$ZAMA