there is no emergency key hiding behind Babylon’s Taproot staking output.
That was the detail i kept returning back to.
most Taproot constructions preserve a key-spending path alongside their script conditions. Babylon does the opposite. It uses the Nothing-Up-My-Sleeve point described in BIP341 as the output’s internal key.
No one knows the private key behind that point, which makes the key path unusable.
The BTC can therefore move only through the three scripts committed at creation: timelock withdrawal, covenant-assisted unbonding, or slashing once the required conditions are satisfied.
At first, removing the fallback looked like an obvious security improvement. No owner, operator, or emergency signer can bypass the protocol’s exit rules later.
But that certainty cuts both ways.
a usable key path gives someone discretion when the original design meets an unexpected failure. Babylon removes that discretion completely and makes the committed scripts the final authority over every possible exit.
The design is harder to override, but it is also less forgiving.
i think the real question is not whether the missing key prevents shortcuts. It clearly does. The question is what happens when a shortcut is exactly what recovery would have needed. Let's hope so.
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY
$ON $COTI
That was the detail i kept returning back to.
most Taproot constructions preserve a key-spending path alongside their script conditions. Babylon does the opposite. It uses the Nothing-Up-My-Sleeve point described in BIP341 as the output’s internal key.
No one knows the private key behind that point, which makes the key path unusable.
The BTC can therefore move only through the three scripts committed at creation: timelock withdrawal, covenant-assisted unbonding, or slashing once the required conditions are satisfied.
At first, removing the fallback looked like an obvious security improvement. No owner, operator, or emergency signer can bypass the protocol’s exit rules later.
But that certainty cuts both ways.
a usable key path gives someone discretion when the original design meets an unexpected failure. Babylon removes that discretion completely and makes the committed scripts the final authority over every possible exit.
The design is harder to override, but it is also less forgiving.
i think the real question is not whether the missing key prevents shortcuts. It clearly does. The question is what happens when a shortcut is exactly what recovery would have needed. Let's hope so.
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY
$ON $COTI
I'm going Long 💚
60%
I'm going short ♥️
40%
5 Stimmen • Abstimmung beendet